Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T11:46:00.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assortment of kaempferol and zinc gluconate improves noise-induced biochemical imbalance and deficits in body weight gain

Subject: Life Science and Biomedicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2021

Isaac Oluwatobi Akefe*
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Jos, Nigeria Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
Joseph Olusegun Ayo
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
Victor Olusegun Sinkalu
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria
*
*Corresponding author. Email: i.akefe@uq.edu.au

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of pretreatment with antioxidants, kaempferol, and zinc gluconate on serum biochemical changes and impairment in body weight gain following noise-exposure in Wistar rats. Thirty-five animals were evenly grouped into five cohorts: Groups II, III, IV, and V were exposed to noise stress, induced by exposing rats to 100 dB (4 hr/day) for 15 days, from days 33 to 48 after starting the drug treatments. Treatment with kaempferol and/or zinc mitigated noise-induced deficits in body weight gain, and levels of serum lipid and protein fractions. The combined treatment significantly (p < .05) decreased malondialdehyde concentration in kaempferol + zinc gluconate treated group, compared to the group administered deionized water + noise. This result demonstrates that biochemical dyshomeostasis and lipid peroxidation may be involved in the molecular mechanism underlying noise stress and the assortment of kaempferol and zinc gluconate produced an improved mitigating outcome in Wistar rats.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Result type: Supplementary result
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Effects of kaempferol and zinc gluconate on percentage body weight gain in male Wistar rats exposed to noise stress (mean ± SEM, n = 7). *p < .05 and ****p < .0001 are significantly different compared to control group (DW + N). DW, deionized water; K, kaempferol; N, noise; ZnG, zinc gluconate.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Effects of kaempferol and zinc gluconate on serum electrolyte concentration (mMol/L) in Wistar rats exposed to noise stress. (a) Potassium (K+), (b) chloride (Cl), (c) bicarbonate (HCO−3), and (d) sodium (Na+). DW, deionized water; K, kaempferol; N, noise; Zn, zinc gluconate (mean ± SEM, n = 7).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Effects of kaempferol and zinc gluconate on serum (a) glucose concentration (mg/dl) and (b) malondialdehyde concentration (MDA) (nmol/mg) in Wistar rats exposed to noise stress (mean ± SEM, n = 7). *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001, and ****p < .0001 are significantly different compared to control group (DW + N). DW, deionized water; K, kaempferol; N, noise; Zn, zinc gluconate.

Figure 3

Table 1. Ameliorative effect of kaempferol and zinc gluconate on concentration of serum protein fractions (mg/dl) of Wistar rats exposed to noise stress (mean ± SEM, n = 6)

Figure 4

Table 2. Ameliorative effect of kaempferol and zinc gluconate on concentration of serum lipid fractions (mg/dl) in Wistar rats exposed to noise stress (mean ± SEM, n = 6)

Figure 5

Figure 4. Relationship between MDA concentration and percentage body weight gain in Wistar rats exposed to noise stress (mean ± SEM, n = 7).

Reviewing editor:  Michael Nevels University of St Andrews, Biomolecular Sciences Building, Fife, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, KY16 9ST
This article has been accepted because it is deemed to be scientifically sound, has the correct controls, has appropriate methodology and is statistically valid, and has been sent for additional statistical evaluation and met required revisions.

Review 1: Assortment of kaempferol and zinc gluconate improves noise-induced biochemical imbalance and deficits in body weight gain in Wistar rats

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none

Comments

Comments to the Author: As kaempferol is insoluble in water, why was deionized water used as its vehicle and administered to control group as vehicle control? Improper solubility of kaempferol in this vehicle also questions the homogeneity of dosage between different rats.

Important parameters of ambient stress like cortisol level, T-4/ T-3 level, heat shock proteins should be determined.

Results of feed intake is missing.

Levels of leptin should be assayed.

What about the weight of different organs?

How did authors access the hearing loss in the rats as is claimed in the manuscript?

How do authors justify oxidative imbalance just by assaying LPO and excluding several other parameters of oxidative stress?

Page 5 line 125-126 is not clear. It seems contradictory to the preceding sentence.

Different superscripts should be provided on the result of different groups presented in figures/ tables. Every group should be statistically compared with other groups.

Overall the study is too superficial.

Presentation

Overall score 2.9 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
4 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
2 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
3 out of 5

Context

Overall score 3.2 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
3 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
3 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
3 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 2.2 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
2 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
3 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
1 out of 5

Review 2: Assortment of kaempferol and zinc gluconate improves noise-induced biochemical imbalance and deficits in body weight gain in Wistar rats

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none

Comments

Comments to the Author: I have provided my comments as follows;

The authors have achieved their objective and the manuscript in generally speaking, well-written.

I will however advise the authors to go through the manuscript once more to ensure that any grammatical error is corrected to enhance clarity.

Also it will be good if the authors could include more recent references as well as specify limitations of the study if any.

Presentation

Overall score 4.7 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
4 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
5 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
5 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4.5 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 4.4 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
5 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
4 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
4 out of 5