Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T10:31:12.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Muscle fatigue resistance in the rat hindlimb in vivo from low dietary intakes of tuna fish oil that selectively increase phospholipid n-3 docosahexaenoic acid according to muscle fibre type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2015

R. Henry
Affiliation:
Exercise and Medical Science Division School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
G. E. Peoples
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia School of Medicine, Centre for Human and Applied Physiology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
P. L. McLennan*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia School of Medicine, Centre for Human and Applied Physiology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
*
* Corresponding author: P. L. McLennan, fax +61 2 4221 4341, email petermcl@uow.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dietary fish oil (FO) modulates muscle O2 consumption and contractile function, predictive of effects on muscle fatigue. High doses unattainable through human diet and muscle stimulation parameters used engender uncertainty in their physiological relevance. We tested the hypothesis that nutritionally relevant FO doses can modulate membrane fatty acid composition and muscle fatigue. Male Sprague–Dawley rats were randomised to control (10 % olive oil (OO) by weight) or low or moderate FO diet (LowFO and ModFO) (HiDHA tuna fish oil) for 15 weeks (LowFO: 0·3 % FO, 9·7 % OO, 0·25 % energy as EPA+DHA; ModFO: 1·25 % FO, 8·75 % OO, 1·0 % energy as EPA+DHA). Hindlimb muscle function was assessed under anaesthesia in vivo using repetitive 5 s burst sciatic nerve stimulation (0·05 ms, 7–12 V, 5 Hz, 10 s duty cycle, 300 s). There were no dietary differences in maximum developed muscle force. Repetitive peak developed force fell to 50 % within 62 (sem 10) s in controls and took longer to decline in FO-fed rats (LowFO 110 (sem 15) s; ModFO 117 (sem 14) s) (P<0·05). Force within bursts was better sustained with FO and maximum rates of force development and relaxation declined more slowly. The FO-fed rats incorporated higher muscle phospholipid DHA-relative percentages than controls (P<0·001). Incorporation of DHA was greater in the fast-twitch gastrocnemius (Control 9·3 (sem 0·8) %, LowFO 19·9 (sem 0·4), ModFO 24·3 (sem 1·0)) than in the slow-twitch soleus muscle (Control 5·1 (sem 0·2), LowFO 14·3 (sem 0·7), ModFO 18·0 (sem 1·4)) (P<0·001), which was comparable with the myocardium, in line with muscle fibre characteristics. The LowFO and ModFO diets, emulating human dietary and therapeutic supplement intake, respectively, both elicited muscle membrane DHA enrichment and fatigue resistance, providing a foundation for translating these physiological effects to humans.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 
Figure 0

Table 1 Dietary fatty acid composition for diets with different concentrations of fish oil (FO)

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Typical experimental trace from the contracting rat hindlimb illustrating force development during a 5-min stimulation protocol (5 Hz, 5 s duty cycle) with (inset) one 5 s burst expanded to show the key derived measures of force and rate of force development (±dT/dtmax).

Figure 2

Table 2 Percentage of fatty acid composition of membrane phospholipids of heart and hindlimb muscles from rats after dietary fish oil (FO) supplementation for 15 weeks (Mean values with their standard errors; n 4–6 per group)

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Effect of diet on force production (N/100 g muscle mass) of gastrocnemius–soleus–plantaris muscle bundle during repeated burst (5 Hz, 5 s duty cycle) stimulation for 5 min. (a) Force of the 1st contraction in each burst and (b) force of the 25th (last) contraction in each burst. Horizontal broken lines represent 50 % of maximum contraction (see Fig. 1 for illustration), arrows (solid=Control diet; broken=FO diets) show coincidence of the (a) 1st and (b) the 25th contraction in a burst with its decline to <50 % of the maximum. Bars represent mean values with their standard errors of the mean. Filled bars: Control diet n 6; shaded bars: LowFO diet n 4; open bars: ModFO diet n 7. * LowFO, ModFO different from control (P<0·05). FO, fish oil; LowFO, low FO diet; ModFO, moderate FO diet. , Control; , LowFO; , ModFO.

Figure 4

Table 3 Effect of dietary fish oil (FO) on time (s) to decline to 50 % of the maximum for contraction and relaxation parameters of the 1st and the 25th (last) contractions in repetitive 5 s burst stimulation(Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Effect of diet on differences in developed force (N/100 g muscle mass) within bursts (below axis) and recovery between bursts (above axis) of (5 Hz, 5 s duty cycle) stimulation over 5 min. Within-burst changes represent short-term fatigue over 5 s. Between bursts represent recovery of contractile force in the 1st contraction of a new burst relative to the 25th (last) contraction of the previous one (see Fig. 1 for illustration). Bars represent mean values with their standard errors of the mean. Filled bars: Control diet n 6; shaded bars: LowFO diet n 4; open bars: ModFO diet n 7. * LowFO, ModFO different from control (P<0·05); † LowFO, ModFO different from control (P<0·02). LowFO, low fish oil diet; ModFO, moderate fish oil diet. , Control; , LowFO; , ModFO.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Effect of diet on maximum rate of force development (dT/dtmax above axis) and maximum rate of force decline (–dT/dtmax below axis) in individual contractions (N/100 g per s) during repeated burst (5 Hz, 5 s duty cycle) stimulation for 5 min. (a) 1st contraction and (b) 25th (last) contraction in each 5 s burst (see Fig. 1 for illustration). Horizontal broken lines represent 50 % of the maximum. Filled symbols: Control diet n 6; shaded symbols: LowFO diet n 4; open symbols: ModFO diet n 7. Symbols and bars represent mean values with their standard errors of the mean. * LowFO, ModFO different from control (P<0·05). † ModFO different from control (P<0·02). LowFO, low fish oil diet; ModFO, moderate fish oil diet. , Control; , LowFO; , ModFO.