Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T06:25:21.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immune-modulating efficacy of a polyphenol-rich beverage on symptoms associated with the common cold: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multi-centric clinical study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2010

Katrin Schütz*
Affiliation:
Rudolf Wild GmbH & Co. KG, Rudolf-Wild-Straße 107-115, 69214 Eppelheim, Germany
Matthias Saß
Affiliation:
Rudolf Wild GmbH & Co. KG, Rudolf-Wild-Straße 107-115, 69214 Eppelheim, Germany
Axel de With
Affiliation:
Rudolf Wild GmbH & Co. KG, Rudolf-Wild-Straße 107-115, 69214 Eppelheim, Germany
Hans-Joachim Graubaum
Affiliation:
analyze & realize ag, Waldseeweg 6, 13467 Berlin, Germany
Jörg Grünwald
Affiliation:
analyze & realize ag, Waldseeweg 6, 13467 Berlin, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Katrin Schütz, email katrin.schuetz@wild.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the present study, the immune-modulating efficacy of a polyphenol-rich beverage on symptoms associated with the common cold was evaluated. For this purpose, ninety-eight patients reporting common cold symptoms that began no longer than 24 h before the study intervention were randomly assigned to consume either the test beverage or placebo twice per d for 10 d. The severity of the disease was expressed as the total score of the five cold symptoms ‘general feeling of sickness’, ‘headache and/or joint aches’, ‘sore throat and/or difficulty swallowing’, ‘hoarseness and/or cough’ and ‘stuffy nose/sniffle’. Consequently, the decrease from 10·2 (sd 3·1) points at the beginning to 2·1 (sd 2·7) points by the end of the study in the verum group demonstrated a clear improvement, whereas in the placebo group only a reduction from 10·5 (sd 3·0) to 6·3 (sd 3·8) points could be observed. The mean difference between the groups (primary efficacy criterion) of 3·9 points was highly significant (P < 0·01). At the end of the study there were highly significantly (P < 0·01) more patients in the verum group complaint free than in the placebo group (secondary efficacy criterion). In addition to these self-reported values, several local findings of the physical examination were also significantly improved in the verum group.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010
Figure 0

Table 1 Sociodemographic data of all volunteers, the verum group and placebo group(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 1

Table 2 Analytical parameters of placebo and verum beverages

Figure 2

Table 3 Total score of cold symptoms during the course of the study(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 3

Table 4 Decrease of total score of cold symptoms during the course of the study (primary efficacy criterion)(Mean differences and standard deviations)

Figure 4

Fig. 1 Evaluation of the five cold symptoms comparing verum (○ morning, ● evening) and placebo (△ morning, ▲ evening) according to the patient diary in points. (a) General feeling of sickness, (b) headache and/or joint paints, (c) throat complaints, (d) hoarseness and/or cough, (e) nasal congestion/sniffle.

Figure 5

Table 5 Relief of complaints at the end of the study (secondary efficacy criterion) (%)

Figure 6

Fig. 2 Change of the concurrent variables comparing verum (●) and placebo (▲) ‘sleep disturbance’ (a), ‘disturbance of daily activity’ (b), ‘additional concurrent medication’ (c) and ‘number of tissues used’ (d) during the study.

Figure 7

Table 6 Global efficacy rating (%) by the physician and patient