Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-dvtzq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T17:53:14.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fossilized pollen malformations as indicators of past environmental stress and meiotic disruption: insights from modern conifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2022

Jeffrey P. Benca*
Affiliation:
Department of Integrative Biology, Museum of Paleontology, University of California–Berkeley, 3060 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. E-mail: duijnstee@berkeley.edu.
Ivo A. P. Duijnstee
Affiliation:
Department of Integrative Biology, Museum of Paleontology, University of California–Berkeley, 3060 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. E-mail: duijnstee@berkeley.edu.
Cindy V. Looy
Affiliation:
Department of Integrative Biology, Museum of Paleontology, University and Jepson Herbaria, University of California, Berkeley, 1001 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, California 94720, U.S.A. E-mail: looy@berkeley.edu
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Pollen malformations have been proposed as a paleoenvironmental stress proxy. However, the frequency and variability of pollen malformations under near-optimal conditions and environmental stress, as well as their developmental origins, remain unclear. To bridge these gaps, we compared pollen malformation frequencies and assemblages of 14 extant conifer genera of Pinaceae and Podocarpaceae producing saccate (winged) grains grown under near-optimal conditions. These baseline pollen yields were compared with those produced by Pinus mugo ‘Columnaris’ cultured under an abiotic stress—three experimentally heightened ultraviolet-B radiation (UV-B) regimes proposed for the end-Permian crisis. We additionally reviewed previous cytological literature of abnormal microsporogenesis in conifers. Under near-optimal conditions, malformations comprise <3% of pollen yields in 12 out of 13 bisaccate genera and >10% of yields in the naturally trisaccate Dacrycarpus dacrydioides. We detected no phylogenetic pattern in malformation assemblages of the baseline comparisons. UV-B–irradiated P. mugo produced significantly higher malformation frequencies and different assemblage compositions when compared with baseline bisaccate lineages. We propose that pollen malformations originate during the meiotic and tetrad stages of microsporogenesis and present a framework for the ontogeny of different malformation types seen in the fossil record. Malformations comprising >3% of bisaccate pollen yields can be used as a paleoenvironmental stress proxy, but rare, naturally trisaccate lineages are not suitable for such assessments. Furthermore, heightened UV-B not only increases pollen malformation production, but also alters the types of abnormalities trees produce. Different environmental stresses may therefore leave behind distinct fingerprints in the fossil record.

Information

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic of phenotypically normal pollen and observed malformation types in bisaccate pollen compared in this study. A, Phenotypically normal bisaccate grain. B–D, Asymmetrical sacci: B, enlarged and reduced sacci; C, fused/confluent sacci; D, encircling sacci. E–H, Atypical number of sacci: E, asaccate grain; F, unisaccate grain; G, trisaccate grain; H, tetrasaccate grain. I–K, Conjoined grains: I, dyad; J, triad; K, tetrad (decussate). L, M, Giant grains: L, giant monad; M, giant dyad. N–P, unseparated grains: N, dyad; O, triad; P, tetrad.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Developmental stages in bisaccate pollen sporogenesis including hypothesized developmental origins of pollen malformation types. A, B, Giant grains: A, giant monad; B, giant dyad. C–E, Conjoined grains: C, dyad; D, triad; E, tetrad (decussate). F–L, Saccus malformations: F, asaccate grain; G, unisaccate grain; H, enlarged and reduced sacci; I, fused/confluent sacci; J, encircling saccus; K, trisaccate grain; L, tetrasaccate grain. M–O, Unseparated grains: M, dyad; N, triad; O, tetrad. Microsporogenesis sequence schematics adapted from Ferguson (1904).

Figure 2

Table 1. In situ saccus malformation incidence of taxa within the Podocarpaceae and Pinaceae.

Figure 3

Figure 3. In situ pollen malformation frequencies in unstressed Podocarpaceae and Pinaceae: A, by species (abbreviated to genus name; Afrocarpus gracilior, Nageia nagi, Podocarpus totara, Dacrycarpus dacrydioides, Phyllocladus trichomanoides, Prumnopitys andina, Lagarostrobos franklinii, Manoao colensoi, Picea orientalis, Cathaya argyrophylla, Pinus parviflora, Cedrus libani, Keteleeria evelyniana, Abies koreana); and B, family. Malformation frequency = 100*(no. malformed grains/600 grains per pollen cone); 5 cones per tree.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Examples of normal pollen grains in comparison with the range of malformation types observed in each of the 14 conifer species studied. Scales for each species represent 20 μm. For accession and specimen information notation see Supplementary Table 2. All specimens and specimen slides are housed in the University of California Museum of Paleontology in Berkeley, California, USA. Afrocarpus gracilior (Pilg.) Page: (1) normal, (2) fused sacci, (3) asaccate, (4) trisaccate, (5) conjoined dyad. Nageia nagi: (6) normal, (7) fused sacci, (8) asaccate, (9) trisaccate. Podocarpus totara: (10) normal, (11) fused sacci, (12) trisaccate, (13) tetrasaccate, (14) conjoined dyad. Dacrycarpus dacrydioides: (15) normal, (16) fused sacci, (17) asaccate, (18) tetrasaccate, (19) conjoined dyad, (20) unseparated triad, (21) conjoined tetrad. Phyllocladus trichomanoides: (22) normal, (23) asaccate, (24) tetrasaccate, (25) conjoined dyad, (26) conjoined triad, (27) unseparated tetrad. Prumnopitys andina: (28) normal, (29) fused sacci, (30) asaccate, (31) trisaccate, (32) unseparated dyad, (33) unseparated triad. Lagarostrobos franklinii: (34) normal, (35) asaccate, (36) unseparated dyad, (37) unseparated triad. Manoao colensoi (Hook.) Molloy: (38) normal, (39) fused sacci, (40) asaccate, (41) conjoined dyad. Picea orientalis (L.) Link: (42) normal, (43) conjoined dyad. Cathaya argyrophylla: (44) normal, (45) fused sacci, (46) asaccate, (47) trisaccate, (48) unseparated dyad. Pinus parviflora Siebold & Zucc.: (49) normal, (50) fused sacci, (51) asaccate. Cedrus libani: (52) normal, (53) fused sacci, (54) unseparated dyad. Keteleeria evelyniana: (55) normal, (56) fused sacci, (57) trisaccate, (58) unseparated triad. Abies koreana: (59) normal, (60) fused sacci, (61) tetrasaccate, (62) unseparated triad, (63) unseparated tetrad.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Malformation assemblages per genus. Extant conifer phylogeny adapted from Leslie et al. (2012). Legend A indicates the color and shape of pollen icons corresponding with normal saccate condition(s) in each genus. These icons are situated left of the pie charts. Legend B refers to the colors corresponding to specific malformation categories visually represented within the pie charts. Gradient in phylogeny color visually signifies that the conifer phylogeny is in large part generated from molecular techniques influenced heavily by crown diversity and that the relationships between these clades in deeper geologic time is less clear (for further discussion, see Leslie et al. 2018).

Figure 6

Figure 6. Comparisons of malformation assemblages versus phylogenetic distance. Bray-Curtis distances were used as a measure of dissimilarity. A, Distribution of pairwise malformation assemblage dissimilarities plotted in phylogenetic context (as in Leslie et al. 2012). Thickness of the lines at each node represents the median of all pairwise dissimilarities between taxa whose lineages diverged in that particular node (dotted lines denote the interquartile range in pairwise dissimilarity values for nodes connecting more than eight pairs. Abbreviations: ABI, Abies koreana; AFR, Afrocarpus gracilior; CAT, Cathaya argyrophylla; CED, Cedrus libani; KET, Keteleeria evelyniana; LAG, Lagarostrobos franklinii; MAN, Manoao colensoi; NAG, Nageia nagi; PHY, Phyllocladus trichomanoides; PIC, Picea orientalis; PIN, Pinus parviflora; POD, Podocarpus totara; PRU, Prumnopitys andina). B, Frequency distribution (box plots of median, interquartile range, and individual data points) of pairwise comparisons within taxonomic groups. The numbers in the phylogenetic tree in A correspond to the same numbers here. Within the Podocarpaceae and the Pinaceae, the groups are ordered based on the estimated age of their last common ancestor. C, Results of correlation and ordinary least squares (OLS) linear regression analysis of all pairwise dissimilarities as a function of the estimated age of the last common ancestor of both taxa in each pair (the dark green area indicates 95% confidence envelope for the regression).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Comparisons of malformation type frequencies versus phylogenetic distance. Dissimilarities are expressed as Euclidean distances. Only bisaccate-pollen-producing species are included. A, distribution of pairwise dissimilarities in malformation type frequencies plotted in phylogenetic context (as in Leslie et al. 2012). Thickness of the lines at each node represents the median of all pairwise dissimilarities between taxa whose lineages diverged in that particular node (dotted lines denote the interquartile range in pairwise dissimilarity values. Abbreviations: ABI, Abies koreana; AFR, Afrocarpus gracilior; CAT, Cathaya argyrophylla; CED, Cedrus libani; KET, Keteleeria evelyniana; LAG, Lagarostrobos franklinii; MAN, Manoao colensoi; NAG, Nageia nagi; PHY, Phyllocladus trichomanoides; PIC, Picea orientalis; PIN, Pinus parviflora; POD, Podocarpus totara; PRU, Prumnopitys andina). B, Frequency distribution (box plots of median, interquartile range, and individual data points) of pairwise comparisons within taxonomic groups. The numbers in the phylogenetic tree in A correspond to the same numbers here. Within the Podocarpaceae and the Pinaceae, the groups are ordered based on the estimated age of their last common ancestor. C, Results of correlation and ordinary least squares (OLS) linear regression analysis of all pairwise dissimilarities as a function of the estimated age of the last common ancestor of both taxa in each pair (the dark green area indicates 95% confidence envelope for the regression).

Figure 8

Figure 8. Canonical variates analysis (CVA) ordination of malformation type frequencies. The first two CVA axes capture about 82% of the total variance in malformation type frequency data, that is, counts of various malformation types encountered in 600 pollen grains studied in each cone. Only bisaccate pollen–producing taxa were included. Shaded areas indicate convex hulls enveloping data for all five cones per species. For clarity, vectors clarifying abnormality type loading on the CVA axes have been translated away from the origin. Abbreviations: Abi, Abies koreana; Afr, Afrocarpus gracilior; Cat, Cathaya argyrophylla; Ced, Cedrus libani; Ket, Keteleeria evelyniana; Lag, Lagarostrobos franklinii; Man, Manoao colensoi; Nag, Nageia nagi; Phy, Phyllocladus trichomanoides; Pic, Picea orientalis; Pin, Pinus parviflora; Pod, Podocarpus totara; Pru, Prumnopitys andina. NB: this analysis reflects the absolute frequency of malformation types, not the relative abundance of types within the malformation assemblage.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Principal component analysis (PCA) of malformation assemblages in unstressed conifers and UV-B experiments. Malformation assemblages encountered in 13 taxa in this study are compared to those in Pinus mugo ‘Columnaris’ trees that grew under various UV-B radiation stress regimes (no UV-B and 7.5×, 10×, and 13× ambient outdoor fluxes of biologically effective UV-B radiation for Berkeley, California, USA, in spring, or respectively, 0, 54, 75, and 93 kJ m−2d−1BE UV-B; see Benca et al. 2018). Relative abundances of malformation types within tree-specific malformation assemblages are used in this analysis. Each malformation assemblage comprises the encountered malformed grains in 3000 investigated pollen grains per tree, that is, 600 grains × 5 pollen cones per tree. In the UV-B experiments, 8 pollen cones per P. mugo ‘Columnaris’ tree were investigated. Shown here are the malformation assemblages of all 56 combinations of 5 cones in a set of 8. The first two PCA axes account for 74% of the variance in the malformation data. Only bisaccate pollen–producing taxa were included. For clarity, vectors indicating abnormality type loading on the PCA axes have been translated away from the origin.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Frequency of three saccus malformation versus frequency of all pollen malformations in unstressed conifers and UV-B experiments. The lower right part (subdiagonal) shows mean frequencies. Green filled circles represent the taxa in this study (frequencies based on 3000 grains per tree). Larger circles indicate Pinus mugo UV-B experimental data (based on 4800 grains per treatment: 600 grains × 8 pollen cones for each of 3 tree replicates; UV-B treatments (0, 54, 75, and 93 kJ m−2d−1BE) are respectively labeled: noUV, 7.5×UV, 10×UV, and 13×UV; see Benca et al. 2018) and pooled data for multiple outdoor control trees (based on 1649 grains; labeled 1×UV, 2013). The upper left part (supradiagonal) is similar to the subdiagonal part but mirrored in the diagonal. It shows ordinary least squares (OLS) linear regression of the per-cone three-sacci malformation frequency as function of the total malformation frequency in the UV-B P. mugo experiments (thick lines; shaded areas indicate 95% confidence envelope for the regression). Each small circle is based on 600 grains from a single cone. For clarity, both axes were square-root-transformed to avoid crowding of the many data points occurring at lower frequencies.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Schematic of tetrad configurations and resulting sacci symmetry in naturally bisaccate pollen grains (A), naturally trisaccate pollen grains (B), and a malformed bisaccate pollen grain having three sacci (C).