Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ksp62 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T16:20:24.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Garcinol promotes hepatic gluconeogenesis by inhibiting P300/CBP-associated factor in late-pregnant sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2020

Weilei Yao
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, People’s Republic of China
Jun Xia
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, People’s Republic of China
Tongxin Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, People’s Republic of China
Juan Li
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, People’s Republic of China
Lu Huang
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, People’s Republic of China
Feiruo Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, People’s Republic of China
*
*Corresponding author: Professor Feiruo Huang, fax +86 10 87280408, email huangfeiruo@mail.hzau.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Disorder of hepatic glucose metabolism is the characteristic of late-pregnant sows. The purpose of our study was to look into the mechanism of garcinol on the improvement of hepatic gluconeogenic enzyme in late-pregnant sows. Thirty second- and third-parity sows (Duroc × Yorkshire × Landrace, n 10/diet) were fed a basal diet (control) or that diet supplemented with 100 mg/kg (Low Gar) or 500 mg/kg (High Gar) garcinol from day 90 of gestation to the end of farrowing. The livers were processed to measure enzymatic activity. Hepatocytes from pregnant sows were transfected with P300/CBP-associating factor (PCAF) small interfering RNA (siRNA) or treated with garcinol. Dietary garcinol had no effect on average daily feed intake, body weight (BW), backfat and BW gain of late-pregnant sows. Garcinol promoted plasma glucose levels in pregnant sows and newborn piglets. Garcinol up-regulated hepatic gluconeogenic enzyme expression and decreased PCAF activity. Garcinol had no effect on the expression of PPAR-γ co-activator 1α (PGC-1α) and Forkhead box O1 (FOXO1) but significantly increased their activity and decreased their acetylation in late-pregnant sows. Transfection of PCAF siRNA to hepatocytes of pregnant sows increased PGC-1α and FOXO1 activities. Furthermore, in hepatocytes of pregnant sows, garcinol treatment also up-regulated the activities of PGC-1α and FOXO1 and inhibited the acetylation of PGC-1α and FOXO1. Garcinol improves hepatic gluconeogenic enzyme expression in late-pregnant sows, and this may be due to the mechanism of down-regulating the acetylation of PGC-1α and FOXO1 induced by PCAF in isolated hepatocytes.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Body weight, average daily feed intake (ADFI), backfat and body weight gain (A–D) in pregnant sows fed 100–500 mg/kg garcinol from day 90 of gestation to the end of farrowing. Effects of dietary garcinol on the plasma glucose levels (E, F, G) of pregnant sows and newborn piglets. Effects of dietary garcinol on litter size weight (H) of newborn piglets. Values are means and standard deviations; n 10, * Significantly different from control group (P < 0·05). a,b Means with unlike letters are significantly different (P < 0·05). (E, F) , non-pregnant; , pregnant; , pregnant + low garcinol (Low Gar); , pregnant + high garcinol (High Gar).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Effects of dietary garcinol on the plasma TAG (A), total cholesterol (TC, (B)), insulin (C), glucagon (D), hepatic glucose levels (E), hepatic glycogen levels (F) and hepatic gluconeogenic protein expression (G, H) in sows fed diets from day 90 of gestation to the end of farrowing. Values are means and standard deviations, n 10. a,b Means with unlike letters are significantly different (P < 0·05). (G) , pregnant; , pregnant + low garcinol (Low Gar); , pregnant + high garcinol (High Gar). PEPCK, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; G6Pase, glucose-6-phosphatase; PGC-1α, PPAR-γ co-activator 1α; FOXO1, Forkhead box O1.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Effects of dietary garcinol (Gar) on the activity of P300/CBP-associating factor (PCAF), PPAR-γ co-activator 1α (PGC-1α) and Forkhead box O1 (FOXO1) ((A)–(C)), acetylation level of PGC-1α and FOXO1 (D, E) in sows fed diets from day 90 of gestation to the end of farrowing. Values are means and standard deviations, n 10. a,b Means with unlike letters are significantly different (P < 0·05). WB, Western blot.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Effects of dietary garcinol on the mRNA expression of phosphofructokinase (PFK) and pyruvate kinase (PK) (A), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) and glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) (B, F), PPAR-γ co-activator 1α (PGC-1α) and Forkhead box O1 (FOXO1) (C), protein expression of PEPCK and G6Pase (G), P300/CBP-associating factor (PCAF) (E), glucose production (H) in hepatocytes from pregnant sows. Values are means and standard deviations, n 10. a,b,c Means with unlike letters are significantly different (P < 0·05). (A–C) , 0 µm garcinol; , 5 µm garcinol; , 10 µm garcinol; , 15 µm garcinol. siRNA, small interfering RNA.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Effects and mechanisms of dietary garcinol on the activity of PPAR-γ co-activator 1α (PGC-1α) and Forkhead box O1 (FOXO1) (A, B), acetylation level of PGC-1α and FOXO1 (C, D) in hepatocytes from pregnant sows. Values are means and standard deviations, n 10. a,b Means with unlike letters are significantly different (P < 0·05). PCAF, P300/CBP-associating factor; siRNA, small interfering RNA; WB, Western blot.

Supplementary material: File

Yao et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S3

Download Yao et al. supplementary material(File)
File 17.3 KB