Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g98kq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-21T08:35:54.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of a Scientific Meeting: The Origin-of-AIDS Debate at the Royal Society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2016

Brian Martin
Brian Martin*
Affiliation:
University of Wollongong, Australia, web: http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin)
*
Correspondence should be addressed to Science, Technology, and Society Program; University of Wollongong; Wollongong NSW 2522; Australia (email: brian_martin@uow.edu.au.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

The Royal Society of London held a scientific meeting in September 2000 focusing on two theories of the origin of AIDS: one, that it occurred through “natural transfer” of immunodeficiency virus from monkeys or chimpanzees to humans; and the other, that it occurred through iatrogenic transfer via contaminated polio vaccines used in Africa in the late 1950s. This meeting was the culmination of years of public contention over the polio-vaccine theory. Several dimensions of the politics of science are revealed by analysis of this issue, including the power of scientific editors, the use of the mass media, decisions regarding selection of speakers and organization of the meeting, and epistemological assumptions made by participants.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and the Life Sciences , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , September 2001 , pp. 119 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences 

References

“AIDS Wars” (2000). Economist (September 16):135–36.Google Scholar
Altman, L.K. (1999) “New Book Challenges Theories of AIDS Origins.” New York Times (November 30):F1.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. S. and Corbitt, G. (1996). “Was HIV Present in 1959?” Lancet 347:189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barendt, E., Lustgarten, L., Norrie, K., and Stephenson, H. (1997). Libel and the Media: The Chilling Effect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, B. (1974). Scientific Knowledge and Sociological Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Basilico, C. et al. (1992). Report from the AIDS/Poliovirus Advisory Committee, September 18.Google Scholar
Berry, N. et al. (2001). “Analysis of Oral Polio Vaccine CHAT Stocks.” Nature 410:1046–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blancou, P. et al. (2001). “Polio Vaccine Samples Not Linked to AIDS.” Nature 410:1045–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bookchin, D. and Schumacher, J. (2000). “The Virus and the Vaccine.” Atlantic Monthly 285 (February):68–80.Google Scholar
Brown, D. (2001). “Polio Vaccine-AIDS Theory Refuted.” Washington Post (April 26):A9.Google Scholar
Chalmers, A.F. (1976). What Is This Thing Called Science? An Assessment of the Nature and Status of Science and Its Methods. Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (2000). “Forensic Epidemiology: Vaccine Theory of AIDS Origins Disputed at Royal Society.” Science 289 (September 15):1850–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H.M. and Pinch, T. (1998). The Golem: What You Should Know about Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Connor, S. (2000). “The Accused.” Independent (London) (September 8): Friday Review 1.Google Scholar
Corbitt, G., Bailey, A.S., and Williams, G. (1990). “HIV Infection in Manchester, 1959.” Lancet 336:51.Google Scholar
Cribb, J. (1996). The White Death. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Curtis, M.K. (1995). “Monkey Trials: Science, Defamation, and the Suppression of Dissent.” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 4:507–93.Google Scholar
Curtis, T. (1992a). “‘Early Test’ for Theory on AIDS.” Houston Post (March 16):A-1, A-9.Google Scholar
Curtis, T. (1992b). Letter. Science 256 (May 29):1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, T. (1992c). “The Origin of AIDS.” Rolling Stone 626 (March 19):54–61, 106, 108.Google Scholar
Curtis, T. (1992d). “Vaccines Not Tested for HIV?” Houston Post (March 18):A-1, A-12.Google Scholar
Curtis, T. (1996). Unpublished letter to Science. In Cribb, J., The White Death. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Curtis, T. and Manson, P. (1992). “Scientist's Polio Fears Unheeded.” Houston Post (April 17):A-1, A-12.Google Scholar
Duesberg, P. (1996). Inventing the AIDS Virus. Washington, DC: Regnery.Google Scholar
Elswood, B.F. and Stricker, R.B. (1993). “Polio Vaccines and the Origin of AIDS.” Research in Virology 144:175–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elswood, B.F. and Stricker, R.B. (1994). “Polio Vaccines and the Origins of AIDS.” Medical Hypotheses 42:347–54; erratum (1995)44:226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, H. (1999). “Something Happened.” New York Review of Books (December 2):14, 16–18.Google Scholar
Garrett, L. (1994). The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Gilks, C. (1999). “Blame Me: Were Chimps the Source of HIV?” New Scientist 164 (November 13):54–55.Google Scholar
Gillon, R. (1992). “A Startling 19,000-Word Thesis on the Origin of AIDS: Should the JME Have Published It?” Journal of Medical Ethics 18:3–4.Google Scholar
Goldberg, B. and Strieker, R.B. (2000). “Bridging the Gap: Human Diploid Cell Strains and the Origin of AIDS.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 204:497–503.Google Scholar
Hahn, B.H., Shaw, G.M., De Cock, K.M., and Sharp, P.M. (2000). “AIDS as a Zoonosis: Scientific and Public Health Implications.” Science 287 (January 28):607–14.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W.D. (1996). Unpublished letter to Science. In Cribb, J., The White Death. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.Google Scholar
Harris, S.B. (1995). “The AIDS Heresies: A Case Study in Skepticism Taken Too Far.” Skeptic 3 (2):42–79.Google Scholar
Hawkes, N. (2000). “Tests Discredit Chimp Theory on HIV.” Times (London) (September 12):6.Google Scholar
Hess, D.J. (1997). Science Studies: An Advanced Introduction. New YorkUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Hess, D.J. (2001). Selecting Technology, Science, and Medicine. Niskayuna, NY: David J. Hess.Google Scholar
Highfield, R. (2000). “Gene Tests ‘Cast Doubt on Vaccine AIDS Claim.”’ Daily Telegraph (UK) (September 12):10Google Scholar
Hooper, E. (2000a). “No Shirking HIV Debate.” Guardian (April 1):25.Google Scholar
Hooper, E. (2000b). The River: A Journey Back to the Source of HIV and AIDS. Harmondsworth: Penguin; Boston: Little, Brown, revised edition.Google Scholar
Karlen, A. (1995). Plague's Progress: A Social History of Man and Disease. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
Klug, A. (2000). “No Shirking HIV Debate.” Guardian (April 1):25.Google Scholar
Koprowski, H. (1992). “AIDS and the Polio Vaccine.” Science 257 (August 21):1024–27; erratum, 257 (September 11):1463.Google Scholar
“Koprowski Sues Rock Mag” (1993). Science 259 (January 8):180.Google Scholar
Korber, B. et al. (2000). “Timing the Ancestor of the HIV-1 Pandemic Strains.” Science 288 (June 9):1789–96.Google Scholar
Lecatsas, G. and Alexander, J.J. (1989). “Safe Testing of Poliovirus Vaccine and the Origin of HIV Infection in Man.” South African Medical Journal 76 (October 21):451.Google Scholar
Lederer, R. (1987/1988). “Origin and Spread of AIDS: Is the West Responsible?” CovertAction Information Bulletin 28:43–54; 29:52–65.Google Scholar
Maggiore, C. (1999). What If Everything You Thought About AIDS Was Wrong? Fourth Edition. Studio City, CA: American Foundation for AIDS Alternatives.Google Scholar
Martin, B. (1993). “Peer Review and the Origin of AIDS-A Case Study in Rejected Ideas.” BioScience 43 (9):624–27.Google Scholar
Martin, B. (1996). “Sticking a Needle into Science: The Case of Polio Vaccines and the Origin of AIDS.” Social Studies of Science 26:245–76.Google Scholar
Martin, B. (1998). “Political Refutation of a Scientific Theory: The Case of Polio Vaccines and the Origin of AIDS.” Health Care Analysis 6:175–79.Google Scholar
Martin, B. (2001). “The Burden of Proof and the Origin of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 356:939–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, J. (2000). “Royal Society Accused in Row over Origins of HIV.” Guardian (March 30):1.7.Google Scholar
Mitroff, I.I. (1974). The Subjective Side of Science: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Aims and Methods of Science. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Moore, J.P. (1999). “Up the River without a Paddle?” Nature 401 (September 23):325–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson-Rees, W.A. (2001). “Responsibility for Truth in Research.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 356:849–51.Google Scholar
O'Hern, E.M. (1985). Profiles of Pioneer Women Scientists. Washington, DC: Acropolis Books.Google Scholar
“‘Origin of AIDS’ Update” (1993). Rolling Stone (December 9):39.Google Scholar
“Panel Nixes Congo Trials as AIDS Source” (1992). Science 258 (October 30):738.Google Scholar
Pascal, L. (1991). What Happens When Science Goes Bad. The Corruption of Science and the Origin of AIDS: A Study in Spontaneous Generation. Working Paper No. 9, Science and Technology Studies, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.Google Scholar
Plotkin, S.A. (2001). “Untruths and Consequences: The False Hypothesis Linking CHAT Type 1 Polio Vaccination to the Origin of Human Immunodeficiency Virus.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 356:815–23.Google Scholar
Plotkin, S.A., Teuwen, D.E., Prinzie, A., and Desmyter, J. (2001). “Postscript Relating to New Allegations Made by Edward Hooper at the Royal Society Discussion Meeting on 11 September 2000.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 356:825–29.Google Scholar
Poinar, H., Kuch, M., and Pääbo, S. (2001). “Molecular Analyses of Oral Polio Vaccine Samples.” Science 292:743–44.Google Scholar
Rambaut, A., Robertson, D.L., Pybus, O.G., Peeters, M., and Holmes, E.C. (2001). “Phylogeny and the Origin of HIV-1.” Nature 410:1047–48.Google Scholar
“Rolling Stone Rolls Over for Koprowski” (1993). Science 262 (November 26): 1369.Google Scholar
Schoub, B.D., Dommann, C.J., and Lyons, S.F. (1990). “Safety of Live Oral Poliovirus Vaccine and the Origin of HIV Infection in Man.” South African Medical Journal 77:51–52.Google Scholar
Shah, K. and Nathanson, N. (1976). “Human Exposure to SV40: Review and Comment.” American Journal of Epidemiology 103:1–12.Google Scholar
Sharp, D. (1999) “A Controversial HIV/AIDS Hypothesis.” The Lancet 354 (September 25):1129–30.Google Scholar
Vidal, J. (2000). “This Is Where Aids Started. I'm Quite Sure'.” Guardian (September 12):G22–4.Google Scholar
Wain-Hobson, S. (1999). “The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS.” Nature Medicine 5 (10):1117–18.Google Scholar
Weiss, R.A. (2001). “Polio Vaccines Exonerated.” Nature 410:1035–36.Google Scholar
Weiss, R.A. and Wain-Hobson, S., eds. (2001). “Origins of HIV and the AIDS epidemic.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 356:777–977.Google Scholar
Wistar Institute (2000). “No AIDS-Related Viruses or Chimpanzee DNA Found in 1950s-Era Polio Vaccine.” Press statement, September 11.Google Scholar
Zhu, T., and Ho, D.D. (1995). “Was HIV Present in 1959?” Nature 374:503–4.Google Scholar