Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-8mwbx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-30T12:14:16.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interaction between Apo A-II -265T>C polymorphism and dietary total antioxidant capacity on some anthropometric indices and serum lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2021

Banafsheh Jafari Azad
Affiliation:
Department of Cellular and Molecular Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Mehdi Yaseri
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Elnaz Daneshzad
Affiliation:
Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Fariba Koohdani*
Affiliation:
Department of Cellular and Molecular Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Diabetes Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
*Corresponding author: Fariba Koohdani, fax +98218897446, email fkoohdan@tums.ac.ir

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the interaction of Apo A-II polymorphism and dietary total antioxidant capacity (DTAC) with lipid profile and anthropometric markers in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) that are at risk for atherosclerosis. This cross-sectional study was conducted on 778 patients with T2DM (35–65 years). Dietary intakes were assessed by a 147-item food frequency questionnaire. DTAC was computed using international databases. Participants were categorised into two groups based on rs5082 genotypes. The gene–diet interaction was analysed by an ANCOVA multivariate interaction model. Total cholesterol, TC; triacylglycerol, TG; high- and low-density lipoprotein, HDL and LDL; TC–HDL ratio; waist circumference, WC and body mass index, BMI were obtained according to standard protocols. Overall, the frequency of CC homozygous was 12⋅1 % among study participants. We found that a significant interaction between rs5082 variants and DTAC on mean WC (PTEAC = 0⋅044), TC concentration (PFRAP = 0⋅049 and PTEAC = 0⋅031) and TC/HDL (PFRAP = 0⋅031 and PTRAP = 0⋅040). Among patients whose DTAC was higher than the median intake, the mean of weight, WC and TC/HDL were significantly higher only in individuals with CC genotype. Also, the high DTAC was associated with a lower TC concentration only in T-allele carriers (PFRAP = 0⋅042). We found that adherence to a diet with high total antioxidant capacity can improve the complications of diabetes and atherosclerosis in the T carrier genotype more effectively than the CC genotype. These results could indicate the anti-atherogenic properties of Apo A-II. However, further studies are needed to shed light on this issue.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitusa

Figure 1

Fig. 1A. Interaction between the APOA2 polymorphism and the dietary TAC: FRAP (a), TRAP (b), TEAC (c), and ORAC (d) intake with regard to BMI. According to the median dietary TAC the participants were dichotomized into “high” and “low” categories (≤, > of median), FRAP (≤15.94, 15.95 > mmol Fe2+/d); TRAP (≤8.25, 8.26 > mmol TE/d); TEAC (≤7.46, 7.47> mmol TE/d); ORAC (≤27296.21, 27296.22> μmol TE/d). P*; crude, P1; model 1, and P2; model 2. P*-values for the interaction terms between dietary TAC intake (as dichotomous) and the APOA2 polymorphism were obtained with General Linear Model (Two-Way ANOVA). The P1 value of the interaction (Model 1) is adjusted for supplement use (as categorical), smoking (as categorical), and total energy intake (as continuous). In model 2, in addition to the variables of model 1, it was also adjusted based on the variables of age (as continuous) and sex (as categorical) using the ANCOVA test. In the stratified analysis by APOA2 genotypes, P-values for mean comparisons of BMI between two categories of antioxidant intake were estimated by Independent Samples t-test. Bars indicate mean ± SD.

Figure 2

Fig. 1B. The interaction between APOA2 -265 T>C polymorphism and the dietary TAC: FRAP (a), TRAP (b), TEAC (c), and ORAC (d) intake on WC. According to the median dietary TAC the participants were dichotomized into “high” and “low” categories (≤, > of median), FRAP (≤15.94, 15.95 > mmol Fe2+/d); TRAP (≤8.25, 8.26 > mmol TE/d); TEAC (≤7.46, 7.47> mmol TE/d); ORAC (≤27296.21, 27296.22> μmol TE/d). P*; crude, P1; model 1, and P2; model 2. P*-values for the interaction terms between dietary TAC intake (as dichotomous) and the APOA2 polymorphism in each population were obtained in the General Linear Model (Two-Way ANOVA). The P1 value of the interaction (Model 1) is adjusted for supplement use (as categorical), smoking (as categorical), and total energy intake (as continuous). In model 2, in addition to the variables of model 1, it was also adjusted based on the variables of age (as continuous) and sex (as categorical) using the ANCOVA test. Independent Samples t-test was used to compare the mean WC between low and high dietary TAC intake base on rs5082 genotypes. The bars indicate mean ± SD.

Figure 3

Fig. 2A. Interaction between APOA2 −265T>C polymorphism and the DTAC: FRAP (a), TRAP (b), TEAC (c), and ORAC (d) intake on serum total cholesterol level. According to the median dietary TAC the participants were dichotomized into “high” and “low” categories (≤, > of median), FRAP (≤15.94, 15.95 > mmol Fe2+/d); TRAP (≤8.25, 8.26 > mmol TE/d); TEAC (≤7.46, 7.47> mmol TE/d); ORAC (≤27296.21, 27296.22> μmol TE/d). P*; crude, P1; model 1, and P2; model 2. P* interactions are obtained with the General Linear Model (Two-Way ANOVA). The P1 value of the interaction (Model 1) is adjusted for sex (as categorical), supplement use (as categorical), smoking (as categorical), fiber, and total energy intake (as continuous). In model 2, in addition to the variables of model 1, it was also adjusted based on the variables of age (as continuous), lipid-lowering medicine (as categorical) and BMI (as continuous) using the ANCOVA test. Independent Samples t-test was used to compare the serum total cholesterol level in the two categories of antioxidant intake. The bars indicate mean (SD).

Figure 4

Fig. 2B. Interaction between the APOA2 polymorphism and the DTAC: FRAP (a), TRAP (b), TEAC (c), and ORAC (d) intake with regard to serum triglyceride level. According to the median dietary TAC the participants were dichotomized into “high” and “low” categories (≤, > of median), FRAP (≤15.94, 15.95 > mmol Fe2+/d); TRAP (≤8.25, 8.26 > mmol TE/d); TEAC (≤7.46, 7.47> mmol TE/d); ORAC (≤27296.21, 27296.22> μmolTE/d). P*; crude, P1; model 1, and P2; model 2. P*-values for the interaction terms between dietary TAC intake (as dichotomous) and the APOA2 polymorphism were obtained with General Linear Model (Two-Way ANOVA). The P1 value of the interaction (Model 1) is adjusted for sex(as categorical),supplement use (as categorical), and fiber, carbohydrate total energy intake (as continuous). In model 2, in addition to the variables of model 1, it was also adjusted based on the variables of age (as continuous) and smoking (as categorical), lipid-lowering medicine (as categorical) and BMI (as continuous) using the ANCOVA test. In the stratified analysis by APOA2 genotypes, P-values for mean comparisons of serum triglyceride levels between two categories of antioxidant intake were estimated by Independent Samples t-test. Bars indicate SD.

Figure 5

Fig. 2C. The interaction between APOA2 -265 T>C polymorphism and the DTAC: FRAP (a), TRAP (b), TEAC (c), and ORAC (d) intake on serum LDL level. According to the median dietary TAC the participants were dichotomized into “high” and “low” categories (≤, > of median), FRAP (≤15.94, 15.95 > mmol Fe2+/d); TRAP (≤8.25, 8.26 > mmol TE/d); TEAC (≤7.46, 7.47> mmol TE/d); ORAC (≤27296.21, 27296.22> μmol TE/d). P*; crude, P1; model 1, and P2; model 2. P*-values for the interaction terms between dietary TAC intake (as dichotomous) and the APOA2 polymorphism in each population were obtained in the General Linear Model (Two-Way ANOVA). The P1 value of the interaction (Model 1) is adjusted for sex (as categorical), supplement use (as categorical), PUFA, fiber, and total energy intake (as continuous). In model 2, in addition to the variables of model 1, it was also adjusted based on the variables of age (as continuous), BMI (as continuous), smoking (as categorical), and lipid-lowering medicine (as categorical) using the ANCOVA test. Independent Samples t-test was used to compare the mean serum LDL level between low and high DTAC intake base on rs5082 genotypes. The bars indicate mean (SD).

Figure 6

Fig. 2D. Interaction between the APOA2 polymorphism and the DTAC: FRAP (a), TRAP (b), TEAC (c), and ORAC (d) intake with regard to serum HDL level. According to the median dietary TAC the participants were dichotomized into “high” and “low” categories (≤, > of median), FRAP (≤15.94, 15.95 > mmol Fe2+/d); TRAP (≤8.25, 8.26 > mmol TE/d); TEAC (≤7.46, 7.47> mmol TE/d); ORAC (≤27296.21, 27296.22> μmol TE/d). P*; crude, P1; model 1, and P2; model 2. P*-values for the interaction terms between dietary TAC intake (as dichotomous) and the APOA2 polymorphism were obtained with General Linear Model (Two-Way ANOVA). The P1 value of the interaction (Model 1) is adjusted for age (as continuous) sex (as categorical), smoking (as categorical), and physical activity (as categorical). In model 2, in addition to the variables of model 1, it was also adjusted based on the variables of supplement use (as categorical), lipid-lowering medicine (as categorical), BMI (as continuous), and total energy intake (as continuous) using the ANCOVA test. In the stratified analysis by APOA2 genotypes, P-values for mean comparisons of serum HDL level between two categories of antioxidant intake were estimated by Independent Samples t-test. Bars indicate SD.

Figure 7

Fig. 2E. The interaction between APOA2 -265 T>C polymorphism and the DTAC: FRAP (a), TRAP (b), TEAC (c), and ORAC (d) intake on TC- HDL-ratio. According to the median dietary TAC the participants were dichotomized into “high” and “low” categories (≤, > of median), FRAP (≤15.94, 15.95 > mmol Fe2+/d); TRAP (≤8.25, 8.26 > mmol TE/d); TEAC (≤7.46, 7.47> mmol TE/d); ORAC (≤27296.21, 27296.22> μmol TE/d). P*; crude, P1; model 1, and P2; model 2. P*-values for the interaction terms between dietary TAC intake (as dichotomous) and the APOA2 polymorphism in each population were obtained in the General Linear Model (Two-Way ANOVA). The P1 value of the interaction (Model 1) is adjusted for age (as continuous) and smoking (as categorical), fiber, and total energy intake (as continuous). In model 2, in addition to the variables of model 1, it was also adjusted based on the variables of sex (as categorical), supplement use (as categorical), lipid-lowering medicine (as categorical), and BMI (as continuous) using the ANCOVA test. Independent Samples t-test was used to compare the mean TC/HDL between low and high DTAC intake base on rs5082 genotypes. The bars indicate mean (SD).