Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kl59c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T00:27:17.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glacitectonic rafts and their role in the generation of Quaternary subglacial bedforms and deposits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2021

David J. A. Evans*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Emrys R. Phillips
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK
Nigel Atkinson
Affiliation:
Alberta Geological Survey, Twin Atria Building, Suite 402, 4999 98th Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2X3, Canada
*
*Corresponding author: Department of Geography, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK. E-mail address: d.j.a.evans@durham.ac.uk (D.J.A. Evans).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Landforms and sediments on the palaeo–ice stream beds of central Alberta record glacitectonic raft production and subsequent progressive disaggregation and moulding, associated substrate ploughing, and grooving. We identify a subglacial temporal or developmental hierarchy that begins with incipient rafts, including en échelon hill-hole complexes, hill-hole pairs, and strike-slip raft complexes, all of which display patterns typical of transcurrent fault activation and pull apart. Many display jigsaw puzzle–style fragmentation, indicative of substrate displacement along shallow décollement zones and potentially related to patchy ice stream freeze-on. Their gradual fragmentation and smoothing produces ice flow-transverse ridges (ribbed moraine), hill-groove pairs, and paraxial ridge and groove associations. Initiator scarp and megafluting associations are indicative of raft dislodgement and groove ploughing, leading to the formation of murdlins, crag-and-tails, stoss-and-lee type flutings and drumlins, and Type 1 hogsback flutings. Downflow modification of rafts creates linear block trains (rubble stripes), stoss-and-lee type megaflutings, horned crag-and-tails, rubble drumlinoids, and murdlins, diagnostic of an immature palaeo–ice stream footprint. Lateral ice stream margin migration ingests disaggregated thrust masses to form ridged spindles, ladder-type morphologies, and narrow zones of ribbed terrain and Type 2 hogsback flutings, an assemblage diagnostic of ice stream shear margin moraine formation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © University of Washington. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2021
Figure 0

Figure 1. Examples of bedrock rafts and likely associated landforms from the Canadian prairie region of soft bedrock: (a) schematic diagram of raft detachment (after Benn and Evans, 2010); (b) a deformed raft of the late Cretaceous Foremost Formation in glacigenic sequence near Bow Island, southern Alberta; (c) the “Laundry Hill erratic” (Stalker and Barendregt, 1988), composed of fragmented Cretaceous bedrock slabs (yellow arrows) in a thick till sequence, Lethbridge, Alberta (cf. Evans et al.,2012); (d) sketch of Stalker's (1973) “murdlin” based on examples near Drumheller, central Alberta; (e) LiDAR image showing tabular-shaped raft north of Irma, central Alberta (Evans et al.,2020); (f) LiDAR image showing conical-shaped raft north of Battle River, central Alberta (Evans et al.,2020). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 1

Figure 2. (color online) Location maps/digital elevation models of Alberta, western Canada, and the sites reported in this study: (a) Province of Alberta with major rivers, major cities, and relevant place names, together with the outlines of the major palaeo–ice stream footprints. HPIS, High Plains; CAIS, Central Alberta; LLBIS, Lac la Biche; SIS, Seibert. The two study areas of this paper are outlined by black boxes. (b) Enlargements of the two study areas outlined by black boxes in a, showing major rivers, lakes, and settlements and outlines of areas in later figures.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (color online) Annotated LiDAR digital elevation model (top) and geomorphology map (bottom) of the megafluting field located near the Athabasca townsite, showing the locations of exposures studied as well as that of Shaw et al. (2000).

Figure 3

Figure 4. (color online) Annotated LiDAR digital elevation model of megafluting fields, drumlins, and initiator scarps near Calling Lake. The Google Earth image (inset) shows an enlarged area of the western flutings and illustrates examples of the chains of straight-sided depressions in the flat-floored grooves.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Sketch of sedimentary structures and clast macrofabric data (including one palaeocurrent sample from the sands) at Schiller excavation site (modified after Shaw et al.,2000).

Figure 5

Figure 6. (color online) Details of the south Athabasca townsite section in the megafluting complex. (a and b) The main section face orientated parallel to the fluting long axis; (c) the exposure orientated oblique to fluting long axis with associated clast macrofabrics. Dmm–massive, matrix-supported diamicton. MLA–mean lineation azimuth.

Figure 6

Figure 7. (color online) Annotated LiDAR digital elevation model (top) and geomorphology map (bottom) of the Otter–Orloff Lakes and Calling Lake area, showing the major landforms.

Figure 7

Figure 8. (color online) The glacial geomorphology of the Laurence Lake-Grosmont area to the northwest of Athabasca. Main panel is annotated LiDAR digital elevation model of the major landforms of the area. Bottom left inset shows the details of the Majors Lake paraxial ridge and groove association (PRGA) and top right inset shows detailed mapping of the glacitectonic landforms in the Jenkins Lake–Grosmont area.

Figure 8

Figure 9. (color online) Annotated LiDAR digital elevation model of the glacial landforms in the area around Lac la Biche and Beaver Lake. Inset boxes show: (a) streamlined inner zone of the Lac la Biche Ice Stream trunk; (b) western boundary zone of the Seibert Ice Stream; (c) streamlined rubble of the inner zone of the Lac la Biche Ice Stream trunk; (d) the Beaver Lake en échelon hill-hole complex (EHHC).

Figure 9

Figure 10. (color online) Details of a quarry exposure in a horned crag-and-tail near the Lac la Biche townsite.

Figure 10

Figure 11. (color online) Annotated LiDAR digital elevation model of the glacitectonic landforms in the Whitefish Lake-Goodfish Lake area, on the southern edge of the Lac la Biche fluting field. EHHC–en échelon hill-hole complex.

Figure 11

Figure 12. Landforms in the Ashmont-St. Paul area, at the junction of the onset zone of the westerly tributary to the Lac la Biche Ice Stream: (a) annotated LiDAR digital elevation model and major glacial geomorphology of the area, with locations of enlarged areas outlined. Black lines represent the crests of major glacitectonic thrust masses; green lines depict major flutings and associated streamlined glacial bedforms; brown outlines demarcate major landform assemblages (Lottie Lake-Saddle Lake composite thrust terrain in the west and overridden and partially cannibalised megafluting in the east); and red lines demarcate discrete streamlined zones on the palaeo–ice stream beds defined by landform styles. Circled cross marks the location of section depicted in b. Detailed areas include the strike-slip raft complexes (SSRCs; incipient shear margin moraine) at western edge of the Lac la Biche palaeo–ice stream (A), hairpin-shaped landforms or murdlins amongst streamlined landforms (B), megablocks/rafts grading into linear rubble stripes (C), a downflow-tapering rubble band located east of Saddle Lake (D), and a fragmented and streamlined raft and groove (hill-groove pair) derived from a source quarry in an overridden megascale glacial lineations (MSGL) (E). (b) Section through raft in the tapering rubble band located immediately east of Lottie Lake, with upper panels showing sedimentologic and structural details and lower panel showing the nature of the rafts and streamlining on an enlargement of the LiDAR imagery. EHHC, en échelon hill-hole complex. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Figure 12

Figure 13. (color online) Hill-groove pair near Goodridge: (a) annotated LiDAR digital elevation model of the glacial landforms in the area; (b) ground overview (i) of landform looking north, with exposures in the parent thrust mass (ii and iii) and in one of the paraxial ridges (iv).

Figure 13

Figure 14. (color online) Sedimentologic and stratigraphic details of section 1 at Drayton Valley, including clast macrofabric data. Dmm–massive, matrix-supported diamicton; Dml–laminated, matrix-supported diamicton; Dmf–fissile, matrix-supported diamicton; MLA–mean lineation azimuth.

Figure 14

Figure 15. (color online) Sedimentologic and stratigraphic details of section 2 at Drayton Valley, including clast macrofabric and structural data. MLA–mean lineation azimuth.

Figure 15

Figure 16. (color online) Sedimentologic and stratigraphic details of section 3 at Drayton Valley, showing details of fragmented rafts of Paskapoo Sandstone and Empress Group sands and enclosing diamictons, together with clast macrofabric data and their locations.

Figure 16

Figure 17. (color online) Sedimentologic and stratigraphic details of section 4 at Drayton Valley, including clast macrofabric and structural data.

Figure 17

Figure 18. (color online) Sedimentologic and stratigraphic details of section 5 at Drayton Valley, including clast macrofabric and structural data.

Figure 18

Figure 19. (color online) Depositional crag-and-tail or stoss-and-lee megaflutings near Warburg: (a) annotated LiDAR digital elevation model of the glacial landforms in the area showing sections at S and N. (b) Top panel shows road cut through a less streamlined raft at location “S,” including clast macrofabric from the capping till. Bottom panels show photograph and sketch of quarry exposure in the margin of a megafluting located at “N,” including clast macrofabric from the sandy glacitectonite. Dmm–massive, matrix-supported diamicton. MLA–mean lineation azimuth.

Figure 19

Figure 20. (color online) Annotated LiDAR digital elevation model of the ploughed megablocks (rafts) near Wandering River.

Figure 20

Figure 21. (color online) Idealised sketches showing: (a) a temporal process–form continuum of glacitectonic raft development and modification into subglacially streamlined landforms (bedforms) based upon ergodic principles; and (b) the relationships between glacitectonic landforms, rafts, and other diagnostic landforms associated with crosscutting and oscillating ice stream activity. MSGL–megascale glacial lineation. CSR–crevasse squeeze ridge.

Figure 21

Figure 22. (color online) Conceptual models of the development of rafts in association with preglacial valley margins, which acted as initiator scarps from which blocks were removed.

Figure 22

Figure 23. (color online) Conceptual model explaining the genetic association between bedrock rafts and various subglacial landforms, including megaflutings/grooves, paraxial ridge and groove associations (PRGAs), hill-groove pairs, prows, and rubble stripes (flutings).

Figure 23

Figure 24. (color online) Idealised sketch showing the typical core of a rubble mound (i.e., a murdlin) in which a bedrock raft has ploughed up a prow and then been overrun and capped by subglacial deforming-layer deposits comprising a vertical continuum of glacitectonite and subglacial traction till. This sequence represents the sedimentologic implications of megablock production in ice stream footprints.