Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T09:22:49.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sparing effect of microbial phytase on zinc supplementation in maize–soya-bean meal diets for chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2007

C. Jondreville*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1079 Systèmes d’élevage Nutrition Animale et Humaine, Agrocampus, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Present address: INRA, USC340 Animal et Fonctionnalités des Produits Animaux, INPL-ENSAIA, BP 172, F-54505Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France
P. Lescoat
Affiliation:
INRA, UR83 Recherches Avicoles, F-37380 Nouzilly, France
M. Magnin
Affiliation:
BASF Nutrition Animale, F-53200 Château Gontier, France
D. Feuerstein
Affiliation:
BASF AG, Rheincenter, D-67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
B. Gruenberg
Affiliation:
BASF AG, Rheincenter, D-67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany
Y. Nys
Affiliation:
INRA, UR83 Recherches Avicoles, F-37380 Nouzilly, France

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to evaluate the sparing effect of microbial phytase on the need for dietary zinc supplementation in chicks. A maize–soya-bean meal basal diet, containing 33 mg of zinc and 16 mg of copper per kg, supplemented with 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 or 60 mg of zinc as sulphate per kg or with 250, 500, 750 or 1000 units (FTU) of microbial phytase (3-phytase from Aspergillus niger, Natuphos®) per kg was given to 1-day-old chicks for 20 days. Sixteen chicks placed in individual cages were assigned to each diet except the unsupplemented basal diet which was assigned to 32 cages. Actual range of phytase supplementation was 280 to 850 FTU per kg diet. Growth performance was not affected by microbial phytase. Chicks given the unsupplemented basal diet and the basal diet supplemented with 60 mg of zinc per kg displayed similar performance. Bone weight, bone ash, liver weight and liver dry matter were independent (P > 0.1) of zinc and phytase supplementations. Plasma, bone and liver zinc concentrations increased linearly (P < 0.001) and quadratically (P < 0.001; P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively) with zinc added. Plasma zinc tended to increase linearly (P = 0.07) and bone zinc increased linearly (P < 0.01) with phytase added but no quadratic response was detected (P > 0.1). Liver zinc was unresponsive to phytase added (P > 0.1). Liver copper decreased linearly (P < 0.001) and quadratically (P < 0.01) with zinc supplementation. Mathematical functions were fitted to the responses of plasma and bone zinc to zinc and phytase added and used to calculate zinc equivalency values of phytase. The models included a linear plateau response to zinc added and a linear response to phytase added. In diets without phytase, plasma and bone zinc concentrations were maximised for a dietary zinc concentration of 55 and 51 mg/kg, respectively. Over the range of 280 to 850 FTU, 100 FTU was equivalent to 1 mg of zinc as sulphate. Consequently, in a maize–soya-bean meal chicken diet formulated to contain 60 mg zinc per kg, zinc ingested, and in turn, zinc excreted may be reduced by around 10% if the diet contains 500 FTU as Natuphos® per kg.

Information

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2007
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition and chemical composition of the basal diet (as-fed basis)

Figure 1

Table 2 Growth performance and plasma, bone and liver characteristics of chickens given the basal diet supplemented with zinc as sulphate or microbial phytase

Figure 2

Table 3 Adjustment of plasma, bone and liver zinc concentrations to zinc added as sulphate and to microbial phytase

Figure 3

Table 4 Equivalency values of zinc added as sulphate (mg) for microbial phytase (FTU) generated from the response of plasma and bone zinc concentrations to zinc added as sulphate and to microbial phytase

Figure 4

Figure 1 Response of plasma and bone zinc concentrations in chicks on diets without microbial phytase supplemented with variable amounts of zinc as sulphate – metaanalysis of literature data†. The model is if Zn < a, Y = c+b (Zn – a); if Zn ⩾ a, Y = c, with Zn = dietary zinc (mg/kg diet), Y = response measurement, a = breakpoint, b = slope of the response, c = maximum value of Y.

Figure 5

Figure 2 Response of bone zinc in chickens to graded levels of zinc as sulphate and of microbial phytase – metanalysis of literature data†. The model is: if Zn + d Phyt < a, Y = c+b (Zn + d Phyt – a); if Zn + d Phyt ⩾ a, Y = c, with Zn = dietary zinc (mg/kg diet), Phyt = dietary phytase (FTU per kg diet), Y = response measurement, a = breakpoint, b = slope of the response, c = maximum value of Y, d = equivalency of one unit of phytase for zinc (mg zinc per FTU).