Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-hzqq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T11:57:14.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regulation of hepatic lipid deposition by phospholipid in large yellow croaker

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2017

Zuonan Cai
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Aquaculture Nutrition and Feed (Ministry of Agriculture) & Key Laboratory of Mariculture (Ministry of Education), Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, People’s Republic of China
Kangsen Mai
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Aquaculture Nutrition and Feed (Ministry of Agriculture) & Key Laboratory of Mariculture (Ministry of Education), Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, People’s Republic of China
Qinghui Ai*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Aquaculture Nutrition and Feed (Ministry of Agriculture) & Key Laboratory of Mariculture (Ministry of Education), Ocean University of China, 5 Yushan Road, Qingdao, Shandong 266003, People’s Republic of China
*
* Corresponding author: Q. Ai, fax +86 532 82031943, email qhai@ouc.edu.cn, aiqinghui@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dietary phospholipid (PL) supplementation has been shown to reduce lipid accumulation in the tissues of farmed fish; however, the mechanisms underlying this effect are largely unknown. Thus, the present study was conducted to evaluate the potential impacts of PL on hepatic lipid metabolism both in vivo and in vitro. For in vivo study, four experimental diets – low lipid and low PL diet, as control diet (LL-LP diet, containing 12 % lipid and 1·5 % PL), low-lipid and high-PL diet (containing 12 % lipid and 8 % PL), high-lipid and low-PL diet (HL-LP diet, containing 20 % lipid and 1·5 % PL) and high-lipid and high-PL diet (HL-HP diet, containing 20 % lipid and 8 % PL) – were randomly allocated to four groups of large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) (three cages per group) with similar initial body weight (approximately 8 g). For in vitro study, primary hepatocytes isolated from large yellow croaker were incubated either with graded levels of phosphatidylcholine (PC) (0–250 μm) or small interfering RNA (siRNA) for CTP: choline phosphate cytidylyltranferase α (CCTα) (siRNA-CCTα). Results showed that survival was independent of dietary treatments (P>0·05). Weight gain and feed efficiency in the HL-HP group were significantly higher than in the LL-LP and HL-LP groups (P<0·05). High level of dietary PL could markedly reduce abnormal hepatic lipid accumulation induced by the HL-LP diet (P<0·05). Similarly, compared with the corresponding controls, a significant decrease/increase in lipid content was observed in primary hepatocytes incubated with PC/siRNA-CCTα (P<0·05). High level of dietary PL reversed the HL-LP diet-induced increased levels of mRNA of fatty acid uptake and lipid synthesis related genes (P<0·05). In addition, High level of dietary PL markedly down-regulated the transcript levels of fatty acid oxidation-related genes and enhanced the transcript levels of VLDL assembly-related genes regardless of dietary lipid levels (P<0·05). Compared with corresponding controls, primary hepatocytes treated with PC showed significantly higher mRNA expression of lipid synthesis and VLDL assembly-related genes and lower mRNA expression of fatty acid oxidation-related genes, with hepatocytes treated with siRNA-CCTα exhibiting the opposite trend (P<0·05). In summary, these results demonstrated that high level of dietary PL might reverse the HL-LP diet-induced abnormal lipid accumulation in the liver through inhibiting fatty acid uptake and lipid synthesis, together with promoting the lipid export at the transcriptional level. Lipid export-promoting effect of PC was confirmed by in vitro studies. The present study showed for the first time that PL or PC could influence various metabolic pathways to regulate hepatic lipid deposition in fish at least at the transcriptional level.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2017 
Figure 0

Table 1 Formulation and chemical composition of the experimental diets (g/kg dry diet)

Figure 1

Table 2 Primer pair sequences for quantitative real-time-PCR

Figure 2

Table 3 Survival and growth parameters for large yellow croaker fed the experimental diets (Mean values with their standard errors; n 3)

Figure 3

Table 4 Lipid contents of the whole body and liver for large yellow croaker fed the experimental diets (%, wet weight) (Mean values with their standard errors; n 3)

Figure 4

Fig. 1 Expression of genes related to fatty acid uptake (a), lipid synthesis (b), fatty acid oxidation (c) and VLDL assembly (d) in liver of large yellow croaker. Values are means (n 3), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. The relative mRNA expression of target genes in the low lipid and low phospholipid (LL-LP) group was selected as the calibrator. , low lipid and high phospholipid (LL-HP); , high lipid and low phospholipid (HL-LP); , high lipid and phospholipid (HL-HP); LPL, lipoprotein lipase; HL, hepatic lipase; CD36, cluster of differentiation 36; FATP1, fatty acid transport protein 1; FABP, fatty acid binding protein; CPT1: carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1; ACO, acyl-CoA oxidase; APOB100, apo B100. Significance was evaluated by two-tailed Student’s t test. Significant differences between the LL-LP and the other treated groups: * P<0·05; significant difference between the HL-LP and HL-HP groups: † P<0·05.

Figure 5

Fig. 2 Regression analyses about TAG contents in primary hepatocytes of large yellow croaker in response to graded concentrations of phosphatidylcholine (PC). Values are means (n 4), with their standard errors.

Figure 6

Fig. 3 Regression analyses about expression of genes related to lipid synthesis (a), fatty acid oxidation (b) and VLDL assembly (c) in primary hepatocytes of large yellow croaker in response to graded concentrations of phosphatidylcholine (PC). Values are means (n 4), with their standard errors. The relative mRNA expression of target genes in the control group was selected as the calibrator. SREBP1, sterol-regulatory element binding protein 1; FAS, fatty acid synthase; SCD1, stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1; DGAT2, acyl-CoA: diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2; CPT1, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1; ACO, acyl-CoA oxidase; MTP, microsomal TAG transfer protein; APOB100, apo B100.

Figure 7

Fig. 4 Effects of CTP: choline phosphate cytidylyltranferase α (CCTα) knockdown on CCTα mRNA expression (a), CCTα protein expression (b), phosphatidylcholine (PC) (c) and TAG (d) contents in primary hepatocytes of large yellow croaker. Values are means (n 4), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. CCTα, CTP: choline phosphate cytidylyltranferase α. Significance was evaluated by two-tailed Student’s t test. Significant difference compared with the control group: * P<0·05.

Figure 8

Fig. 5 Effects of CTP: choline phosphate cytidylyltranferase α (CCTα) knockdown on mRNA expression of key genes related with lipid synthesis (a), fatty acid oxidation (b) and VLDL assembly (c) in primary hepatocytes of large yellow croaker. Values are means (n 4), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. The relative mRNA expression of target genes in the control group was selected as the calibrator. SREBP1, sterol-regulatory element binding protein 1; FAS, fatty acid synthase; SCD1, stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1; DGAT2, acyl-CoA: diacylglycerol acyltransferase 2; CPT1: carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1; ACO, acyl-CoA oxidase; MTP, microsomal TAG transfer protein; APOB100, apo B100. Significance was evaluated by two-tailed Student’s t test. Significant difference compared with the control group: * P<0·05.