Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-v2srd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T00:16:03.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethnoarchaeology in Indonesia Illuminating the Ancient Past at Çatalhöyük?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ron L. Adams
Ron L. Adams*
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 156 (rladams@sfu.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a recent volume of American Antiquity, Hodder and Cessford (2004) suggested that various aspects of the domestic architecture at Çatalhöyük reflect a concern for the construction of social memory and social regulations through daily, habituated practices. The authors note that domestic architecture provides a locus for the construction of social memory in ethnographically documented “house societies” (e.g., Carsten and Hugh-Jones 1995; Joyce and Gillespie 2000) and imply that a similar pattern was prevalent during the Neolithic at Çatalhöyük. While not disputing the general premises of this suggestion, I argue that ethnoarchaeological work in two house societies in Indonesia ( West Sumba and Tana Toraja) can provide further, more detailed insight and some alternate perspectives on the social system of Neolithic Çatalhöyük, particularly in relation to notions of “daily practice” and the critical role of feasting in these societies.

Résumé

Résumé

En un volumen reciente de American Antiquity, Hodder y Cessford (2004) sugirieron que varios aspectos de la arquitectura doméstica en Çatalhöyük reflejan un interés en la construcción de la memoria social y de las normas sociales mediante las prácticas cotidianas y habituales. Los autores observan que la arquitectura doméstica provee un espacio para la construcción de la memoria social dentro de las” sociedades de casa” que se han documentado etnográficamente (p.ej. Carsten y Hugh-Jones 1995; Joyce y Gillespie 2000*) y dan a entender que un modelo semejante prevalecía durante el Neolítico en Çatalhöyük. Aunque no discuto las premisas generales de esta sugerencia, sostengo que el trabajo etnoarqueológico dentro de dos sociedades de casa en Indonesia (West Sumba y Tana Toraja) pueden proveer un entendimiento más profundo y algunas perspectivas alternativas sobre el sistema social del Çatalhöyük neolítico, especialmente con relación a ideas de “lo cotidiano” y el papel crucial del banquete en estas sociedades.

Information

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 181 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References Cited

Adams, Ron L. 2004 An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Feasting in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26:56–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistik, Badan Pusat Kantor 1998 Tana Toraja Dalam Angka 1998. Badan Pusat Kantor Statistik Kabupaten. Tana Toraja.Google Scholar
Beding, B. Michael, and Beding, S. Indah Lestari 2002 Mozaik Sumba Barat: Rekaman Jurnalistik. The Mosaic of West Sumba. Pemda Sumba Barat, Kabupaten Sumba Barat.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1977 Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsten, Janet, and Hugh-Jones, Stephen (editors) 1995 About the House: Levi-Strauss and Beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clarke, Michael J. 1998 Feasting among the Akha of Northern Thailand: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Archaeology Department, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Susan D. 2000 Beyond kinship: An introduction. In Beyond Kinship: Social and Material Reproduction in House Societies, edited by Rosemary, Joyce and Susan, D. Gillespie, pp. 1–21. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Gunawan, Istutiah 1998 Hierarchy and Balance: A Study of Wanokaka Social Organization. Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Hampton, O. W. 1999 Culture of Stone: Sacred and Profane Uses of Stone among the Dani. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian 1996 Feasting in Prehistoric and Traditional Societies. In Food and the Status Quest: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, edited by Polly, Wiessner and Wulf, Schiefenhoevel, pp. 127–146. Berghahn Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian 2000 Torajan Feasting in South Sulawesi: 1999 Preliminary Report (with revisions from 2000 field season). Manuscript on file, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian 1998 Prolegomenon to the Importance of Feasting. In Feasts: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics, and Power, edited by Michael, Dietler and Brian, Hayden, pp. 23–64. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington.Google Scholar
Hayden, Brian 2003 Were Luxury Foods the First Domesticates? Ethnoarchaeological Perspectives from Southeast Asia. World Archaeology 34:458–469.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian, and Cessford, Craig 2004 Daily Practice and Social Memory at Catalhoyiik. American Antiquity 69:17–40.Google Scholar
Hoskins, Janet (editor) 1995 Headhunting and the Social Imagination in Southeast Asia. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
Jordan, Peter 2003 Material Culture and Sacred Landscape: The Anthropology of the Siberian Khanty. Altamira Press, New York.Google Scholar
Joyce, Rosemary, and Gillespie, Susan D. (editors) 2000 Beyond Kinship: Social and Material Reproduction in House Societies. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Kim, Seung-Og 1994 Burials, Pigs, and Political Change in Neolithic China. Current Anthropology 35:119–141.Google Scholar
Kuijt, Ian 1995 Negotiating Equality through Ritual: A Consideration of Late Natufian and Prepottery Neolithic A Period Mortuary Practices. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 15:313–336.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1983 The Way of the Masks. Jonathan Cape, London.Google Scholar
Nooy-Palm, Hetty 1979 The Sa’dan-Toraja: A Study of their Social Life and Religion, Vol. 1. Foris Publications, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandarupa, Stanislaus 1998 Life and Death in Toraja. 21 Computer Ujung Pandang, Ujung Pandang, Indonesia.Google Scholar
Simoons, Frederick J. 1968 A Ceremonial Ox of India: The Mithan in Nature. Culture, and History. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Song, C. 1964 Mortuary Practices among the Naxi Minority Groups of Yunnan Province (in Chinese). Kaogu, no. 4, pp. 200–204.Google Scholar
Sparkes, Stephen, and Howell, Signe (editors) 2003 The House in Southeast Asia: A changing Social, Economic and Political Domain. Routledge Curzon, London.Google Scholar
Wall, Lindsay, and Kuschel, Rolf 1975 Burial Customs and Grave Sites on Pre-Christian Nggatokae, Western Solomon Islands. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania 10:55-66.Google Scholar