Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T15:27:59.849Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A review on the recent advances concerning the fatigue performance of titanium alloys for orthopedic applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2020

Leonardo Contri Campanelli*
Affiliation:
Institute of Science and Technology, Federal University of São Paulo, 12231-280 São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil Department of Materials Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, 13565-905 São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: leonardo.campanelli@unifesp.br

Abstract

This article presents a review on recent advances in the fatigue behavior of Ti alloys, especially the main commercial compositions for orthopedic applications. In the case of well-known Ti–6Al–4V alloy, the major concern is related to the effect of the surface modification necessary to improve the osseointegration. The introduction of surface discontinuities due to the growth of a porous oxide layer, or the roughness development, may severely affect the fatigue performance depending on the level of alteration. In the case of additive manufactured Ti–6Al–4V, the fatigue response is also influenced by inherent defects of as-built parts. Regarding the recently developed metastable β alloys, information about the fatigue properties is still scarce and mainly related to the effect of second phase precipitates, which are introduced to optimize the mechanical properties. The fatigue behavior of the Ti alloys is complex, as is their microstructure, and should not be neglected when the alloys are being developed or improved to be applied in medical devices.

Information

Type
REVIEW
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020, published on behalf of Materials Research Society by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1: Schematic drawing of the phenomenon of stress shielding.

Figure 1

Figure 2: High cycle fatigue results of Ti–6Al–4V with three different microstructural conditions. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier [12].

Figure 2

Figure 3: (a) SEM micrograph of the nanotubes layer on the Ti–6Al–4V surface. (b) A schematic drawing of the expected cross section (values not in scale). Reprinted with permission from Elsevier [16].

Figure 3

Figure 4: SEM micrographs of the oxide layer on the CP-Ti surface. (a) Sample annealed at 450 °C (anatase structure). (b) Annealed at 650 °C (rutile structure). Reprinted with permission from Materials Research [22].

Figure 4

Figure 5: Schematic roughness profile and definition of the dimensions required in the calculation of both the Ra and Rz roughness parameters.

Figure 5

Figure 6: Curve of the fatigue limit (in terms of maximum stress) of the Ti–6Al–4V ELI alloy as function of the surface roughness. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier [27].

Figure 6

Figure 7: SEM micrographs of the fatigue fractures. (a) A specimen with surface modified by Nd:YAG laser irradiation. (b) A specimen with an untreated surface. The black arrows indicate the sites of crack initiation. Reprinted with permission from Materials Research [34].

Figure 7

Figure 8: Simulation by FEA of the first principal and the von Mises stress distributions in a commercial hip stem. Reprinted with permission from Materials Research [34, 35].

Figure 8

Figure 9: Microstructure of the Ti–15Mo alloy in the solution treated and quenched condition after the fatigue test. (a) The longitudinal cross section of a fractured specimen. (b) The amplification of the crack initiation region. The arrow indicates the initiation site. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier [42].

Figure 9

Figure 10: Finite element modeling of: (a) Kt versus the distance d between the pore and the surface normalized by the pore diameter D normal to the loading vector, for three aspect ratios; (b) Kt versus the separation s (sold material) between pore edges normalized by the pore diameter of one of the pores D1, for equal spherical pores and for one pore with twice the diameter of another pore. Reprinted with permission from Springer Nature [56].