Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-2tv5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T06:50:03.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BMI, body fat and waist-to-height ratio of stunted v. non-stunted Indian children: a case–control study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2016

Mitravinda S Savanur*
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Sir Vithaldas Vihar, SNDT Women’s University, Juhu Road, Mumbai – 400049, Maharashtra, India
Padmini S Ghugre
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Sir Vithaldas Vihar, SNDT Women’s University, Juhu Road, Mumbai – 400049, Maharashtra, India
*
* Corresponding author: Email mitrasav@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To compare the BMI, body fat and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) of stunted and non-stunted children following different growth trajectories from low socio-economic strata in Mumbai, India.

Design

Cross-sectional, case–control study. Weight, height, skinfold thicknesses and waist circumference were measured. Information regarding the duration of breast-feeding, age at initiation of complementary feeding and income was obtained. Birth weight was obtained from records. BMI, body fat, WHtR and change in weight sd were calculated.

Setting

Children who were beneficiaries of anganwadis, Mumbai city, India.

Subjects

Three hundred and thirty children aged 2–4 years were selected in each of the stunted and non-stunted groups after matching for age and sex.

Results

After adjusting for birth weight, change in weight sd, duration of breast-feeding, age at complementary feeding initiation and income, stunted children had significantly higher body fat, WHtR and BMI than the non-stunted (P<0·01). The stunted and non-stunted children were classified based on their change in weight sd. Stunted children with no change in weight sd had higher mean body fat, BMI (P<0·01) and WHtR (P<0·05) than their non-stunted counterparts. In the catch-up growth group, stunted children had higher BMI and WHtR than the non-stunted (both P<0·001). In the catch-down growth group, stunted children had higher BMI than the non-stunted (P<0·001).

Conclusions

Stunting was seen to increase the tendency of conserving body fat in young children. Such a tendency, if continued during later childhood and adolescence, can increase the risk of obesity and non-communicable diseases.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 
Figure 0

Table 1 Characteristics of the sample of children aged 2–4 years from low socio-economic strata in Mumbai, India, July 2013–July 2014

Figure 1

Table 2 Unadjusted mean anthropometric parameters, BMI, skinfold thickness, WC, WHtR, BF% and change in weight sd in stunted and non-stunted boys and girls aged 2–4 years from low socio-economic strata in Mumbai, India, July 2013–July 2014

Figure 2

Table 3 Adjusted mean BMI, BF%, skinfold thickness, WC and WHtR in stunted and non-stunted boys and girls aged 2–4 years from low socio-economic strata in Mumbai, India, July 2013–July 2014

Figure 3

Table 4 Adjusted mean BMI, BF%, skinfold thickness, WC and WHtR across the change in weight sd categories in non-stunted and stunted children aged 2–4 years from low socio-economic strata in Mumbai, India, July 2013–July 2014