Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6bnxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T06:46:51.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adverse effects of conjugated alpha-linolenic acids (CLnA) on lipoprotein profile on experimental atherosclerosis in hamsters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2007

M. Plourde*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1234, F-21000 Dijon, France INAF/STELA, Université Laval, Canada, G1K 7P4 Present address: Research Center on Aging, 1036 Belvédère sud, Sherbrooke, Québec, CanadaJ1H 4C4
M. Ledoux
Affiliation:
Unité Composition et Hygiène des Produits Laitiers, AFSSA, 23 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, F-94706 Maisons Alfort Cedex, France
S. Grégoire
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1234, F-21000 Dijon, France
L. Portois
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Experimental Surgery, ULB, Brussels, Belgium
J. J. Fontaine
Affiliation:
UP d’Histologie et Anatomie Pathologique, École Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, F-94704 Maisons Alfort Cedex, France
Y. A. Carpentier
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Experimental Surgery, ULB, Brussels, Belgium
P. Angers
Affiliation:
INAF/STELA, Université Laval, Canada, G1K 7P4
J. M. Chardigny
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1019, Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 France; CRNH Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000, France
J. L. Sébédio
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1019, Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 France; CRNH Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000, France

Abstract

Conjugated linoleic acids (CLAs) such as rumenic acid (RA) have the potential to alter blood lipid profiles in animals and in humans. In contrast, physiological effects of conjugated α-linolenic acids (CLnAs), which concomitantly are omega-3 and conjugated fatty acids, are still unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of CLnA to interfere in early steps of atherosclerosis by altering lipoprotein profiles and fatty streaks in the aortas. F1B hamsters were fed a control or one of the three hypercholesterolemic (HC) diets: HC-control, HC-RA (18:2 cis-9, trans-11) or HC-CLnA (CLnA: equimolar mixture of 18:3 cis-9, trans-11, cis-15 and cis-9, trans-13, cis-15) diet. In low-cholesterol control-fed hamsters, the proportion of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was around 45% while in HC-fed hamsters, HDL-C was around 10% and cholesterol was mostly (80%) carried by triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) triglycerides (TGs) increased by approximately 60% in hamsters fed either HC-RA or HC-CLnA compared with HC-controls but not compared with the low-cholesterol control diet. HDL cholesterol decreased by 24% and 16% in hamsters fed HC-RA and HC-CLnA, respectively. Small dense LDL-cholesterol increased by approximately 60% in hamsters fed HC-RA and HC-CLnA compared with the HC-control group and by more than a 100% compared with hamsters on the control diet. The relative percentage of liver cholesteryl ester content increased by 88% in hamsters fed HC diets compared with the control diet. Significant differences in fatty streaks were observed between control and HC-diet-fed hamsters. However, no significant difference was observed among the HC-diet-fed hamsters. This study shows that animals fed any one of the HC diets developed an adverse lipoprotein profile compared with a normolipidic diet. Also, HC-RA or HC-CLnA diets altered lipoprotein profile compared with animals fed the HC-control diet but had no beneficial effects on atherosclerosis.

Information

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2007
Figure 0

Table 1 Fatty acid profile (%) of the control and the three hypercholesterolemic diets containing 23% (in weight) of lipids and 0.12% of cholesterol

Figure 1

Table 2 Mean ± s.e. for body weight (BW) (g) and food consumption (g/day) during the experimental period in hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet

Figure 2

Table 3 Means ± s.e. for plasma triglyceride (TG) and cholesterol (mg/dl) concentrations of hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet

Figure 3

Table 4 Means ± s.e. for total cholesterol content (μmol/l) of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) separated by discontinuous density gradient in hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet

Figure 4

Figure 1 Density profiles of low-density lipoproteins of hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet. The partition number 15 corresponds to a density of 1.040 g/ml. HC-control = hypercholesterolemic control diet, HC-RA = hypercholesterolemic rumenic acid diet, HC-CLnA = hypercholesterolemic conjugated alpha-linolenic acids diet, TC = plasma total cholesterol.

Figure 5

Figure 2 Liver lipid class profile (%) of hamsters fed a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet. Results are expressed as mean of 14 independent values ± s.e. HC-control = hypercholesterolemic control diet, HC-RA = hypercholesterolemic rumenic acid diet, HC-CLnA = hypercholesterolemic conjugated alpha-linolenic acids diet, CE = cholesterol esters, TG = triglycerides, PL = phospholipids.

Figure 6

Table 5 Hamster aorta fatty streaks scores following a control or a hypercholesterolemic control, RA or CLnA diet