Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nqrmd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T11:43:22.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinetics of phosphate absorption in lactating dairy cows after enteral administration of sodium phosphate or calcium phosphate salts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2013

Walter Grünberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Paul Dobbelaar
Affiliation:
Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Gerhard Breves
Affiliation:
Physiologisches Institut, Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Walter Grünberg, fax +31 30 252 1887; email waltergruenberg@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hypophosphataemia is frequently encountered in dairy cows during early lactation. Although supplementation of P is generally recommended, controversy exists over the suitability of oral P supplementation in animals with decreased or absent rumen motility. Since the effects of transruminal P absorption and the reticular groove reflex on the absorption kinetics of P are not well understood, it is unclear in how far treatment efficacy of oral P supplementation is affected by decreased rumen motility. Phosphate absorption was studied in six phosphate-depleted dairy cows fitted with rumen cannulas and treated with test solutions containing either NaH2PO4 or CaHPO4 with acetaminophen. Each animal was treated orally, intraruminally and intra-abomasally in randomised order. Absorption kinetics of P were studied and compared with the absorption kinetics of acetaminophen, a marker substance only absorbed from the small intestine. Intra-abomasal treatment with NaH2PO4 resulted in the most rapid and highest peaks in plasma inorganic P (Pi) concentration. Oral and intraruminal administration of NaH2PO4 resulted in similar increases in plasma Pi concentration from 4 to 7 h in both groups. Treatment with NaH2PO4 caused more pronounced peaks in plasma Pi concentration compared with CaHPO4. Neither transruminal P absorption nor the reticular groove reflex affected P absorption kinetics as determined by comparing plasma concentration–time curves of P and acetaminophen after administration of 1 m-phosphate salt solutions. It is concluded that oral treatment with NaH2PO4 but not CaHPO4 is effective in supplementing P in hypophosphataemic cows with adequate rumen motility. Decreased rumen motility is likely to hamper the efficacy of oral phosphate treatment.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 
Figure 0

Table 1 Ingredients and composition of the total mixed ration (TMR) fed during the acclimatisation and experimental phases

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Plasma phosphate concentration according to treatment and relative to baseline (T0) in the NaH2PO4 administered into the abomasum (NaAbo; ; A), CaHPO4 administered into the abomasum (CaAbo; ; A), NaH2PO4 administered into the ventral rumen sac (NaRu; ; B), NaH2PO4 administered orally (NaOr; ; B) and CaHPO4 administered into the ventral rumen sac (CaRu; ; B) groups. , Upper and lower limits of the reference range for plasma inorganic phosphorus (Pi) concentration in dairy cattle. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that at T0 (P< 0·05, Bonferroni corrected). a,b,c Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different between groups (P< 0·05).

Figure 2

Table 2 Maximal plasma acetaminophen concentration (CAPmax), time to maximal plasma acetaminophen concentration (TAPmax), areas under the plasma acetaminophen concentration–time curves for the first 60 min (AUCAP60) and 120 min (AUCAP120) after treatment stratified by treatment group, maximal plasma phosphate concentration (CPmax), maximal plasma phosphate concentration increment (CPmaxDiff), time to maximal plasma phosphate concentration (TPmax), and areas under the plasma phosphate concentration increment–time curves for the first 120 min (AUCPDiff120) 240 min (AUCPDiff240), 420 min (AUCPDiff420) and 720 min (AUCPDiff720) after treatment stratified by treatment group (Mean values with their pooled standard errors of all groups or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR))

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Plasma acetaminophen concentration according to treatment and relative to baseline (T0) in the NaH2PO4 administered into the abomasum (NaAbo; ; A, left panel), CaHPO4 administered into the abomasum (CaAbo; ; A, right panel), NaH2PO4 administered into the ventral rumen sac (NaRu; ; B, left panel), NaH2PO4 administered orally (NaOr; ; B, middle panel) and CaHPO4 administered into the ventral rumen sac (CaRu; ; B, right panel) groups. Values are medians, with interquartile ranges represented by vertical bars. a,b,cMedian values with unlike letters were significantly different between groups (P< 0·05). (C) Detailed view of plasma acetaminophen concentration–time curves for the time period 0–120 min for the NaAbo (), NaRu () and NaOr () groups. Values are medians, with interquartile ranges represented by vertical bars. a,bMedian values with unlike letters were significantly different between groups (P< 0·05). Data of NaOr are slightly offset with respect to time to improve readability.

Figure 4

Fig. 3 Plasma calcium concentration according to treatment and relative to baseline (T0) in the NaH2PO4 administered into the abomasum (NaAbo; ; A), NaH2PO4 administered into the ventral rumen sac (NaRu; ; A), NaH2PO4 administered orally (NaOr; ; A), CaHPO4 administered into the abomasum (CaAbo; ; B) and CaHPO4 administered into the ventral rumen sac (CaRu; ; B) groups. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that at T0 (P< 0·05, Bonferroni corrected). a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different between groups (P< 0·05).

Figure 5

Fig. 4 Rumen phosphate (Pi) concentration according to treatment and relative to baseline (T0) in the NaH2PO4 administered into the ventral rumen sac (NaRu; ), NaH2PO4 administered orally (NaOr; ) and NaH2PO4 administered into the abomasum (NaAbo; ) groups. Values are medians, with interquartile ranges represented by vertical bars. * Median value was significantly different from that at T0 (P< 0·05, Bonferroni corrected). a,b,cMedian values with unlike letters were significantly different between groups (P< 0·05).

Figure 6

Fig. 5 Rumen calcium concentration according to treatment and relative to baseline (T0) in the NaH2PO4 administered into the ventral rumen sac (NaRu; ; A), NaH2PO4 administered orally (NaOr; , A), NaH2PO4 administered into the abomasum (NaAbo; ; A), CaHPO4 administered into the abomasum (CaAbo; ; B) and CaHPO4 administered into the ventral rumen sac (CaRu; ; B) groups. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Mean value was significantly different from that at T0 (P< 0·05, Bonferroni corrected). a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different between groups (P< 0·05).