Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-vdhp9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T05:03:53.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Limited effect of seed dormancy on the efficacy of preemergence herbicides in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2025

Danica E. Goggin*
Affiliation:
Research Associate, Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
Mechelle J. Owen
Affiliation:
Senior Research Officer, Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
Roberto Busi
Affiliation:
Research Fellow, Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia current: Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Perth, WA, Australia
Ken Flower
Affiliation:
Professor, Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative, UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Danica E. Goggin; Email: danica.goggin@uwa.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Widespread resistance to selective postemergence herbicides has led to increased use of preemergence herbicides to control rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaudin), the major weed of southern Australian cropping systems. Seeds of L. rigidum are dormant at maturity, leading to staggered germination across the growing season and avoidance of pre-sowing knockdown herbicides by the later-germinating cohorts. Although it is well known that this selects for higher seed dormancy in intensively cropped areas, there is less information on whether dormant seeds respond differently to preemergence herbicides applied at sowing. To address this, seeds of field-collected L. rigidum populations were divided into dormant and nondormant (afterripened) subsamples and treated with sublethal rates of three preemergence herbicides in order to monitor seedling emergence and seed persistence over 6 mo. The presence of prosulfocarb and pyroxasulfone eliminated the nearly 4-fold increase in seedling emergence that typically results from afterripening, while trifluralin was partially inhibitory. In all treatments, the proportion of viable seeds remaining in the soil after 6 mo was negligible (≤3% of the viable seeds originally sown) for both the dormant and nondormant seeds. Application of radiolabeled herbicides to soil and seeds showed that the herbicides persisted in the seed tissue for longer than in the bulk soil. Therefore, the presence of dormant L. rigidum seeds in the soil seedbank is unlikely to result in cohorts that can avoid preemergence herbicides.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America
Figure 0

Table 1. Lolium rigidum. populations used for dormancy and herbicide-resistance analysis.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Responses of seeds germinated on herbicide-containing agar. Data for all 24 populations were pooled to assess the effects of herbicides on (A) seed viability, (B) weighted germination index, (C) coleoptile elongation, and (D) radicle elongation of fresh and afterripened (AR) seeds. Data are means ± SE (n = 24). Symbols above bars denote significant (P < 0.05) differences between fresh and AR seeds within a herbicide treatment (asterisk, *) or differences between herbicide-treated and untreated seeds within the fresh and AR cohorts (caret, ^).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Plot of weighted germination index of untreated fresh seeds vs. seedling elongation of afterripened seeds germinated on herbicide-containing agar to indicate the relative dormancy and herbicide resistance of field-collected populations (dark blue dots) compared with control populations (colored dots). Values are means ± SE (n = 3). Shaded areas show the arbitrary dormancy and resistance category into which each population falls.

Figure 3

Table 2. Effect of herbicide and afterripening (AR) treatments on the weighted germination index (WGI) of seeds sown on soila

Figure 4

Figure 3. Response of field-collected populations to treatment with sublethal rates of preemergence herbicides. Fresh and afterripened (AR) seeds from each population were sown onto the surface of soil and treated with trifluralin, prosulfocarb, or pyroxasulfone. Seedling emergence and survival were monitored weekly for 6 mo, and the viability of ungerminated seeds was assessed to determine the fate (A) and weighted germination index (B) of the seed populations. Values are means ± SE (n = 18); symbols above bars denote significant (P < 0.05) differences between fresh and AR seeds within herbicide treatments (asterisk, *) or between herbicide-treated and -untreated seeds within the fresh and AR cohorts (caret, ^).

Figure 5

Figure 4. Dissipation of (A) trifluralin and (B) prosulfocarb from soil and the surface and interior of seeds treated with 14C-labeled herbicides and incubated in closed vials with charcoal traps for 168 d. Data are expressed as a percentage of the total 14C recovered from the vial system at t = 0 d. Cumulative emergence data pooled across the 18 field-collected populations are shown for (C) untreated, (D) trifluralin-treated, and (E) prosulfocarb-treated fresh seeds at the equivalent time points as those in (A) and (B). Total survival (emergence to the 3-leaf stage plus viable ungerminated seeds) of the pooled field-collected populations at 182 d after treatment with no herbicide (Unttd), trifluralin (Trif), or prosulfocarb (Pro) is shown in (F). In A and B, values are means ± SE (n = 3); within each sample type, different letters above bars denote significant (P < 0.05) differences among time points. In C–F, values are means ± SE (n = 18). In F, an asterisk (*) denotes a significant difference between survival of herbicide-treated and untreated seeds.

Supplementary material: File

Goggin et al. supplementary material

Goggin et al. supplementary material
Download Goggin et al. supplementary material(File)
File 472.1 KB