Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-9prln Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T18:00:15.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of tissue-specific interaction between vitamin C and vitamin E in vivo using senescence marker protein-30 knockout mice as a vitamin C synthesis deficiency model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2021

Ayami Sato
Affiliation:
Molecular Regulation of Aging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo 173-0015, Japan Institute of Life Innovation Studies, Toyo University, Gunma 374-0193, Japan
Yuka Takino
Affiliation:
Molecular Regulation of Aging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo 173-0015, Japan
Tomohiro Yano
Affiliation:
Institute of Life Innovation Studies, Toyo University, Gunma 374-0193, Japan
Koji Fukui
Affiliation:
Molecular Cell Biology Laboratory, College of Systems Engineering and Science, Graduate School of Engineering and Science, Shibaura Institute of Technology, Saitama 337-8570, Japan
Akihito Ishigami*
Affiliation:
Molecular Regulation of Aging, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo 173-0015, Japan Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan
*
*Corresponding author: Akihito Ishigami, email ishigami@tmig.or.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vitamin E (α-tocopherol; VE) is known to be regenerated from VE radicals by vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid; VC) in vitro. However, their in vivo interaction in various tissues is still unclear. Therefore, we alternatively examined the in vivo interaction of VC and VE by measurement of their concentrations in various tissues of senescence marker protein-30 (SMP30) knockout (KO) mice as a VC synthesis deficiency model. Male SMP30-KO mice were divided into four groups (VC+/VE+, VC+/VE–, VC–/VE+ and VC–/VE–), fed diets with or without 500 mg/kg VE and given water with or without 1·5 g/l VC ad libitum. Then, VC and VE concentrations in the plasma and various tissues were determined. Further, gene expression levels of transporters associated with VC and VE, such as α-tocopherol transfer protein (α-TTP) and sodium-dependent vitamin C transporters (SVCTs), were examined. These results showed that the VE levels in the VC-depleted (VC–/VE+) group were significantly lower than those in the VC+/VE+ group in the liver and heart; the VC levels in the VE-depleted (VC+/VE–) group were significantly lower than those in the VC+/VE+ group in the kidneys. The α-TTP gene expression in the liver and kidneys was decreased by VC and/or VE depletion. Moreover, SVCT1 gene expression in the liver was decreased by both VC and VE depletion. In conclusion, these results indicate that VC spares VE mainly in the liver and heart and that VE spares VC in the kidneys of SMP30-KO mice. Thus, interaction between VC and VE is likely to be tissue specific.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Body and tissue weights

Figure 1

Table 2. Blood biochemical examination

Figure 2

Fig. 1. VE and VC concentrations in the plasma of SMP30-KO mice fed with control (VC+/VE+), VE-depleted (VC+/VE–), VC-depleted (VC–/VE+) or simultaneously VE and VC-depleted (VC–/VE–) diets for a month. The painted upper part of VC in each column indicates the DHA level. Data are expressed as the mean ± sem (n 6–7). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0·05) among groups by Tukey’s test following one-way ANOVA.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. VE concentrations in the liver, heart, lungs, pancreas, kidneys, testes, epididymal fat, cerebrum and cerebellum of SMP30-KO mice fed with control (VC+/VE+), VE-depleted (VC+/VE–), VC-depleted (VC–/VE+) or simultaneously VE and VC-depleted (VC–/VE–) diets for a month. Data are expressed as the mean ± sem (n 6–7). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0·05) among groups by Tukey’s test following one-way ANOVA.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. VC concentrations in the liver, heart, lungs, pancreas, kidneys, testes, epididymal fat, cerebrum and cerebellum of SMP30-KO mice fed with control (VC+/VE+), VE-depleted (VC+/VE–), VC-depleted (VC–/VE+) or simultaneously VE and VC-depleted (VC–/VE–) diets for a month. The painted upper part in each column indicates the DHA level. Data are expressed as the mean ± sem (n 6–7). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0·05) among groups by Tukey’s test following one-way ANOVA.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Relative expression levels of αTTP and ABCA1 in the liver, heart and kidneys of SMP30-KO mice fed with control (VC+/VE+), VE-depleted (VC+/VE–), VC-depleted (VC–/VE+) or simultaneously VE and VC-depleted (VC–/VE–) diets for a month. Data are expressed as the mean ± sem (n 6–7). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0·05) among groups by Tukey’s test following one-way ANOVA.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Relative expression levels of SVCT1 and SVCT2 in the liver, heart and kidneys of SMP30-KO mice fed with control (VC+/VE+), VE-depleted (VC+/VE–), VC-depleted (VC–/VE+) or simultaneously VE and VC-depleted (VC–/VE–) diets for a month. Data are expressed as the mean ± sem (n 6–7). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0·05) among groups by Tukey’s test following one-way ANOVA.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. GSH levels in the liver, heart and kidneys of SMP30-KO mice fed with control (VC+/VE+), VE-depleted (VC+/VE–), VC-depleted (VC–/VE+) or simultaneously VE and VC-depleted (VC–/VE–) diets for a month. Data are expressed as the mean ± sem (n 6–7). Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0·05) among groups by Tukey’s test following one-way ANOVA.

Supplementary material: Image

Sato et al. supplementary material

Sato et al. supplementary material 1

Download Sato et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 153.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sato et al. supplementary material

Sato et al. supplementary material 2

Download Sato et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13.4 KB