Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pkds5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T05:43:32.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The interaction between suicidal ideation, insomnia symptoms, and student status

Subject: Psychology and Psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2021

Jodie C. Stevenson
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
Kamila Irvine
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
Sarah Allen
Affiliation:
School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Law University of Teesside, Middlesbrough, UK
Umair Akram*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Sociology and Politics, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: u.akram@shu.ac.uk

Abstract

Evidence demonstrates increased vulnerability to thoughts and behaviors related to suicide (i.e., suicidal ideation) in students. This study examined the interaction between insomnia-symptoms and student-status (students vs. non-students) on reports of suicidal thoughts of behaviors. A total of 363 (N = 363) university students and 300 (N = 300) members of the general population provided complete data on measures of insomnia-symptoms and suicidal ideation. Students indicated greater reports of both total and lifetime ideation while also considering suicidal behavior within the past year. However, no differences were observed in reports of possible future attempt(s) and the disclosure of suicidal thoughts and behaviors to another person. Moreover, students presenting concurrent symptoms of insomnia reported significantly elevated levels of suicidal ideation relative to nonstudents. These outcomes highlight the possible role of insomnia symptoms in accentuating suicidal thoughts and behaviors in the student population.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Result type: Novel result
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Mean scores for each measure for the whole sample and separated by suicidal ideation risk

Figure 1

Figure 1. Bar chart decomposing the interaction between sleep (normal-sleeper vs. insomnia symptoms) and student status (student vs. nonstudent) on total SBQ-R scores. No difference in total SBQ-R scores observed between normal sleeping students and nonstudents (left). Significantly higher total SBQ-R scores displayed among students with insomnia symptoms (right). Abbreviations: SBQ-R, Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised. *Significance at <.01.

Reviewing editor:  Teresa Ober University of Notre Dame, Department of Psychology, E418 Corbett Family Hall, Notre Dame, Indiana, United States, 46556
This article has been accepted because it is deemed to be scientifically sound, has the correct controls, has appropriate methodology and is statistically valid, and has been sent for additional statistical evaluation and met required revisions.

Review 1: The interaction between suicidal ideation, insomnia symptoms, and student status

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none

Comments

Comments to the Author: This is a nice and concise m/s looking at the association between insomnia status and suicidal ideation in students compared to non-students. I like the m/s and have some questions/comments the answers to which I think might add clarity to the m/s.

1. I would be cautious in using phases such as ‘completed suicides’ suicide deaths would work.

2. Although rates of suicide has increased in student populations, it remains lower than general population.

3. Some of the references used are quite outdated (e.g. Casey et al, 2008) – several more recent sources exist.

4. I’m not convinced that social media platforms/ online forums = general population sample.

5. Should sleep status/ demographics be in measures?

6. Were the data assessed for age/gender differences? How do the data compare to sleep in these groups?

I hope the authors find these suggestions useful in revising their m/s.

Presentation

Overall score 4 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
4 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
3 out of 5

Context

Overall score 5 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
5 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 5 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
5 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
5 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
5 out of 5

Review 2: The interaction between suicidal ideation, insomnia symptoms, and student status

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to the Author: A clear and interesting report that gives important context to insomnia and suicidal ideation in students compared to general adult population. Measures and methods are appropriate. Enjoyed reading. If word count allows the manuscript would be improved by expanding discussion: 1) Mention that sleep disturbances are associated with increased subsequent suicidal ideation using evidence from longitudinal studies (suggested references below). This will help overcome the limitation re. cross-sectional studies. 2) Address the significant age difference between students and general population subgroups. Perhaps reference studies which compare insomnia and/or mental distress between students and similarly-aged peers to add partial justification of older age in present non-student sample.

Section1Para1

Incorrect reference: Baker2016 doesn’t mention students.

ONeil2018 doesn’t compare students to general population, but I appreciate this contrast is handled later on.

S2P1

“Furthermore, studies sampling…” Slightly unclear sentence.

S3P2+P3

Add possible range of scores for measures to give context to Table 1 values.

S4P1

Mean ages of insomnia (26.52 and 31.11) and student status (21.30 and 41.23) subgroups don’t make sense compared to overall mean age (41.02). Check values.

S4 P3

“Therefore, the experience of insomnia symptoms may accentuate suicidal ideation specifically amongst the student population.” Opposite might be true: ideation as source of poorer sleep. I don’t disagree that insomnia is a cause rather than effect, based on longitudinal studies (e.g., 10.1017/S0033291718001009, 10.4088/JCP.16m11193).

Akram 2020 now has full publication details available, can update [In Press] placeholder.

Typo: “asey, P…”

Missing from reference list:

Ribeiro2016

Cracknell2015

Niles2006

Harvey2002

Presentation

Overall score 4.7 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
5 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
4 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4.2 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 4.6 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
4 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
5 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
5 out of 5