Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-t6st2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T09:13:59.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Taphonomy and environmental distribution of Pseudophillipsia in the middle Permian Kamiyasse Formation of the Southern Kitakami Terrane, Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2026

Nakuru Kudo*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
Yuta Shiino
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Nakuru Kudo; Email: nakuru.kudo@gmail.com

Abstract

Evidence suggests that trilobites experienced moderate diversification during the middle Permian, of which Pseudophillipsia Gemmellaro, 1892 is the most successful, with an unusually high number of species. However, it remains unclear whether their abundance reflects a stratigraphic trend or is specific to their habitat. To address this, we conducted a taxonomic study of Pseudophillipsia from the middle Permian (Capitanian) Kamiyasse Formation of the Southern Kitakami Terrane, Japan, and examined the burial processes to understand their habitat. Careful taxonomic analysis identified two species, Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera Kobayashi and Hamada, 1980 and Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) cf. Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) raggyorcakaensis Qian, 1981. The trilobites occur in both sandstone and mudstone, preserved as complete outstretched or enrolled specimens as well as disarticulated specimens, the majority of which are pygidia. Sedimentary facies indicate that the sandstone layer was formed in a shallow marine environment close to the lower shoreface, whereas the mudstone layer represents a slightly deeper environment, occasionally altered by storm flows. Based on biostratinomic features, the outstretched specimens with convex-up orientation must be autochthonous, whereas the enrolled specimens are interpreted as para-autochthonous, likely transported by storm flows. The greater the bioturbation, the greater the likelihood of the trilobite skeleton being disarticulated, particularly in mudstone layers. These findings suggest that Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera inhabited both sandy and muddy substrata, whereas Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) cf. Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) raggyorcakaensis was restricted to sandy environments. Given the limited geographic extent of the Kamiyasse Formation, we hypothesize that the appearance of Pseudophillipsia reflects a change in the sedimentary environment.

Information

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Paleontological Society
Figure 0

Figure 1. Locality map and columnar section along the surveyed routes: (1) location of the Kamiyasse area; (2) geological map along the Imo-sawa, Tateishi-sawa, Minami-sawa, Toya-sawa, Shigeji-sawa, and Doya-sawa Creeks in the Kamiyasse area, showing fossil localities; (3) columnar section of route Ss1–3; the generalized columnar section and its stratigraphic age were modified from Shiino et al. (2008, 2011), Kobayashi et al. (2009), and Masunaga and Shiino (2021).

Figure 1

Table 1. Abundance of preservation modes in Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera Kobayashi and Hamada, 1980 and Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) cf. P. (Carniphillipsia) raggyorcakaensis Qian, 1981. *Complete, outstretched specimens of Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera includes the holotype material (UMUT PA16699)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Morphological terminology of the present trilobites. The schematic illustrations are based on Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera Kobayashi and Hamada, 1980.

Figure 3

Figure 3. The complete exoskeletons and cephalon of Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera Kobayashi and Hamada, 1980: (1) silicone rubber cast of the holotype specimen (UMUT PA16699); (2) lateral view of (1); (3) lateral view of an incomplete enrolled specimen (UMUT PA34243); most of the pygidium is covered by rock; (4) three-dimensional (3D) model of (3); (5) magnified thoracic segments of (4); (6) lateral view of a complete enrolled specimen (UMUT PA34241); (7) outstretched specimen (UMUT PA34238); the specimen suffered vertical compaction; (8) 3D model, dorsal view, of (7); (9) lateral view of (8); (10) ventral view of (8); (11) detail of (10); (12) a cephalon lacking right side of free cheek (UMUT PA34266); (13) 3D model, dorsal view, of (11); (14) lateral view of (12); (15) ventral view of (12). ap, apodeme; fa, fossular apodeme; fs, fossula; poa, postannulus; pra, preannulus.

Figure 4

Figure 4. The disarticulated components of cephalon and thorax of Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera Kobayashi and Hamada, 1980: (1) silicon rubber cast, dorsal view, of external mold of a cephalothoraco (UMUT PA34247); (2) lateral view of (1); (3) 3D model, dorsal view, of a free cheek (UMUT PA34246); (4) lateral view of (3); (5) silicon rubber cast of external mold of the cranidium without palpebral lobes (UMUT PA34269); (6) internal mold of (5); (7) cross sectional view of 3D model of the outstretched specimen in Figure 3.7 (UMUT PA34238); (8) 3D model, ventral view, of the hypostome (UMUT PA34240); (9) lateral view of (8); (10) ventral view of the cephalon in Figure 3.3 (UMUT PA34243); (11) 3D model of a rostral plate (UMUT PA34243); (12) transverse view of a 3D model of a first thoracic segment (UMUT PA34240); (13) lateral view of (12); (14) dorsal view of (12) and the second thoracic segments; (15) silicon rubber cast of a magnified thoracopygon (UMUT PA34253); seventh, eighth, and ninth thoracic segments are articulated with pygidium. aw, anterior wing; cr, cranidium; db, doublure; es, eye socle; esf, eye socle furrow; fa, facet; fc, free cheek; hy, hypostome; lg, lateral glabellar lobe; or, occipital ring; pl, preoccipital lobe; pw, posterior wing; rp, rostral plate; sor, subocular ridge.

Figure 5

Figure 5. The pygidium of Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera Kobayashi and Hamada, 1980: (1) dorsal view of a moderately large pygidium (UMUT PA34391); (2) lateral view of (1); (3) posterior view of (1); (4) dorsal view of a moderately small pygidium (UMUT PA34328); (5) lateral view of (4); (6) posterior view of (4); (7) ventral view of silicon rubber cast of internal surface of pygidium (UMUT PA34251); (8) internal mold of (7); (9) dorsal view of pygidium (UMUT PA34374); original exoskeleton is partially preserved; (10) internal mold of a pygidium (UMUT PA34239); (11) internal mold of a pygidium (UMUT PA34288); (12) silicon rubber cast of an external mold of a pygidium (UMUT PA34397); (13) internal mold of the smallest pygidium (UMUT PA34405). White arrowheads mark a short ridge (furrow in internal mold) extending from pygidial border.

Figure 6

Figure 6. The disarticulated exoskeletons of Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) cf. Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) raggyorcakaensis Qian, 1981: (1) internal mold of a cranidium lacking palpebral lobe (UMUT PA34423); (2) internal mold of a cranidium (UMUT PA34423); (3) internal mold, dorsal view, of the free cheek (UMUT PA34432); (4) external mold, lateral view, of (3); (5) internal mold of a thoracopygon (UMUT PA34421); (6) silicon rubber cast of external mold of a pygidium (UMUT PA34439); (7) silicon rubber cast of external mold of a pygidium (UMUT PA34438); (8) silicon rubber cast of external mold of a pygidium (UMUT PA34441); (9) internal mold of (7).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Schematic illustration of Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) cf. Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) raggyorcakaensis Qian, 1981.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Preservation modes of Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera Kobayashi and Hamada, 1980 in sandstone and mudstone.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Sedimentary facies and trilobite occurrence in sandstone: (1) vertical section of fine- to medium-grained sandstone with fusulines; lower part of fusulinid layer shows cross lamination; (2) vertical section of fine-grained sandstone with parallel to weakly crossed lamination; (3) vertical section of fine-grained sandstone; fossiliferous layers are discontinuous due to abundant bioturbation (white arrowheads); (4) lateral view of colorized 3D model showing an outstretched Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera; (5) trilobite assemblage with enrolled specimen; (6) plan view of fossiliferous layer with fusuline Monodiexodina Sosnina, 1965; dashed circle shows a pygidium of Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) cf. Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) raggyorcakaensis; (7) plan view of fossiliferous layer with disarticulated crinoid columns; dashed circle shows a fragmented, abraded pygidium of Pseudophillipsia sp. indet.; (8) plan view of fossiliferous layer, including smaller skeletal remains of crinoids, bivalves, and Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) cf. Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) raggyorcakaensis (Prg) just above a layer with large cranidia of Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera (Psp) and bivalves. eb, erosional base; fl, fossiliferous layer; Ne, ichnofossil Nereites isp. indet.; Ph, ichnofossil Phycosiphon isp. indet.; Prg, Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) cf. Pseudophillipsia (Carniphillipsia) raggyorcakaensis; Psp, Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera; Rz, ichnofossil Rhizocorallium isp. indet.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Sedimentary facies and trilobite occurrence in mudstone: (1) vertical section of sandy mudstone with abundant trace fossils of Rhizocorallium isp. indet.; white arrowhead points to the cross section shown in (4) and (5); (2) vertical section of fossiliferous mudstone; dashed circle shows a pygidium of Pseudophillipsia; (3) 3D model of Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera reconstructed using microfocus X-ray CT; (4, 5) selected tomographic images of 3D model in (3) showing several rows of trace fossils Rhizocorallium isp. indet. (dashed lines of spreite); (6) plan view of fossiliferous mudstone with brachiopod Leptodus sp. indet. and Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera (dashed circle); (7) cephalothoraco of Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera; (8) thoracopygon of Pseudophillipsia (Pseudophillipsia) spatulifera. cr, cephalon; fc, free cheek; fl, fossiliferous layer; Ne, ichnofossil Nereites isp. indet.; py, pygidium; Rz, ichnofossil Rhizocorallium isp. indet.; th, thoracic segment.

Figure 11

Figure 11. Taphonomic pathways of trilobites. Trilobite specimens include dead individuals and exuvial skeletal remains, and the two can only be identified by the condition of cephalon in proetids.

Figure 12

Figure 12. Taphonomic process of the trilobites in the Kamiyasse Formation. Complete, outstretched exoskeletons of trilobites and bryozoans are autochthonous (in situ), whereas enrolled, disarticulated exoskeletons of trilobites are para-autochthonous.