Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bp2c4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T00:37:07.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Entamoeba histolytica protein CaBP3 uses a calcium dependent nuclear localisation pathway in mammalian cells

Subject: Life Science and Biomedicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2020

Kejun Wei
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Therapeutic Solutions, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Australia
Reena Ghildyal*
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Therapeutic Solutions, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: Reena.Ghildyal@canbera.edu.au; Tel: +612 6201 5755.

Abstract

Entamoeba histolytica is a major cause of dysentery that leads to a high level of morbidity and mortality, especially in developing countries. Calmodulin-like calcium binding protein EhCaBP3 of E. histolytica is directly involved in disease mechanisms with roles in cytoskeleton dynamics and scission during erythrophagocytosis in a calcium dependent fashion. Interestingly, EhCaBP3 is also present in the nucleus of E. histolytica. We have used a transfected cell system to show that EhCaBP3 is capable of calcium dependent nucleocytoplasmic trafficking. Our data confirms and extends recent findings suggesting presence of a calcium dependent nuclear transport pathway in E. histolytica.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Result type: Novel result
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. EhCaBP3 is localised in the nucleus and cytoplasm and has a calcium dependent nuclear transport

Overnight, subconfluent monolayers of COS-7 were transfected with plasmids to express GFP alone, GFP-EhCaBP3, GFP-SRY, GFP-SRY-R76P or GFP-SRY-R133W using Lipofectamine 2000, as per manufacturer’s recommendations. Cells were either left untreated or treated with Thapsigargin (5 μM) for 6 h prior to live imaging on CLSM 24 h after transfection. Selected digital images are shown in A and C. Digital images were analysed with ImageJ to obtain relative fluorescence in the nucleus compared to that in the cytoplasm (Fn/c), shown in the histograms B, D. The yellow lines demarcate the cell outline. Two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s test was used to determine statistical differences and values are shown on the histograms; ns = non-significant, significance was accepted at p 
Reviewing editor:  André Luis Souza dos Santos Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, General Microbiology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 21941-901
This article has been accepted because it is deemed to be scientifically sound, has the correct controls, has appropriate methodology and is statistically valid, and has been sent for additional statistical evaluation and met required revisions.

Review 1: Entamoeba histolytica protein CaBP3 uses a calcium dependent nuclear localisation pathway

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to the Author: The authors expressed the calmodulin-like calcium binding protein EhCaBP3 was expressed in human background, and with carefully chosen controls demonstrated that localizes in the nucleus utilizing a calcium-dependent pathway. However, three points must be addressed:

1. The title of the paper should reflect that EhCaBP3 was tested in human background.

2. The introduction should give proper credit to EhCaBP precedent (Verma et al., 2017), not only discussing such previous findings.

3. Since the image is very well contrasted, marking at least one cell membrane could help untrained eyes to interpret Figure 1C.

Presentation

Overall score 4.4 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
5 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
3 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4.3 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 4.6 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
4 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
5 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
5 out of 5

Review 2: Entamoeba histolytica protein CaBP3 uses a calcium dependent nuclear localisation pathway

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to the Author: In this paper, the authors set out to investigate whether calmodulin-like EhCaBP3 iscapable of calcium-dependent nucleocytoplasmic trafficking in Entamoeba histolytica through overexpression of EhCaBP3 in transfected mammalian cells and determination of its localisation, followed by investigation of changes on increased cytosolic calcium. The results of this well-conducted study suggested the presence of complex nuclear transport pathways in E. histolytica similar to higher eukaryotes. I strongly recommend the publication of this paper.

Presentation

Overall score 5 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
5 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
5 out of 5

Context

Overall score 5 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
5 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 5 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
5 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
5 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
5 out of 5