No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Spatial distribution of northern shrimp Pandalus eous in the Sea of Japan in relation to the seafloor environment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 October 2024
Abstract
To explore relationships between spatial distributions of northern shrimp Pandalus eous and environmental factors along the coastline of Honshu Island in the Sea of Japan, we built delta-type two-step generalized additive models (delta-GAM) based on bottom trawl surveys conducted in 2013–2022. The models provide the first quantitative analysis of the species’ habitat, showing that its distribution is associated with bottom sediment type, depth, slope and topographic position index (TPI) alongside the effects of year and region. From the delta-GAM response plots, species habitat preferences in the Sea of Japan were estimated as follows: seafloor deeper than 283 m; muddy rather than sandy bottoms; gently sloped to flat bottoms (<0.8° in slope); and valleys rather than ridges (TPI < 0.9). These results were reviewed in detail along with previously reported distribution records of northern shrimp. Standardized density (s-density) per fishing grid cell (10′ square latitude–longitude mesh) estimated from the delta-GAM results indicated that this species is widely distributed on the continental slope along the coast of Honshu Island. To test plausibility of the s-density analysis, we compared s-density per fishing grid cell with nominal CPUE (kg per haul) per fishing grid cell based on official logbook data from large offshore trawl fisheries. The two were generally positively correlated by year, and the delta-GAM results were assumed to be fairly robust. Finally, potential fishing grounds were explored based on the delta-GAM results.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
References
Bergström, BI (2000) The biology of Pandalus. Advances in Marine Biology 38, 55–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, GD, Niccolucci, MJ and Schuster, EG (1994) Identifying proxy sets in multiple linear regression: an aid to better coefficient interpretation. Research Paper INT 470, 1‒12.Google Scholar
Butler, TH (1964) Growth, reproduction, and distribution of pandalid shrimps in British Columbia. Journal of the Fishery Research Board of Canada 21, 1403–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, TH (1980) Shrimps of the Pacific Coast of Canada. Canadian Bulletin of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 202, 1–280.Google Scholar
Cao, J, Thorson, JT, Richards, RA and Chen, Y (2017) Spatiotemporal index standardization improves the stock assessment of northern shrimp in the Gulf of Maine. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 74, 1781–1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastie, TJ and Tibshirani, RJ (1986) Generalized additive models. Statistical Science 1, 297–318.Google Scholar
Haynes, EB and Wigley, RL (1969) Biology of the northern shrimp, Pandalus borealis, in the Gulf of Maine. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 98, 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hijmans, RJ (2022) raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 3.5-29. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster/ (accessed online 12 December 2022).Google Scholar
Ito, H (1976) On the distribution and the life history of deep-sea shrimp, Pandalus borealis Krøyer, in the Japan Sea. Bulletin of the Japan Sea Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory 27, 75–89.Google Scholar
Ivanov, BG (1970) Распределение СЕВЕРНОТО ШРИМСА В БЕРИНГОВОМ МОРЕ И ЗАЛИВЕ АЛЯСКА. Trudy VNIRO 70/Izvestiya TINRO 72, 131–148.Google Scholar
Kasutani, Y (1993) Relations between the shape of tilled seabed and the population density of pink shrimp and snow crab off Wakasa Bay. Proceedings of JAMSTEC Symposium on Deep Sea Research 9, 361–366.Google Scholar
Kitano, Y and Yorita, T (1978) On the pink shrimp stock off west Kamchatka Peninsula and its exploitation. Bulletin of the Hokkaido Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory 43, 1–20.Google Scholar
Kojima, I, Yorita, T and Ueno, T (1969) Fishing ground and some biological observations of shrimps off Ishikari Bay, Hokkaido. Scientific Reports of Hokkaido Fisheries Experimental Station 11, 30–40.Google Scholar
Komai, T (1999) A revision of the genus Pandalus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Pandalidae). Journal of Natural History 33, 1265–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krøyer, H (1838) Conspectus Crustaceorum Groenlandiae. Naturhistorisk tidsskrift 2, 249–261.Google Scholar
Kubo, I (1965) Decapoda, Macrura. In Okada, YK, Uchida, S and Uchida, T (eds), New Illustrated Encyclopedia of the Fauna of Japan. Tokyo: Hokuryukan, pp. 591‒629.Google Scholar
Kurata, H (1981) Pandalid shrimp fisheries of Japan. In Frady, T (ed.), Proceedings of the International Pandalid Shrimp Symposium, Kodiak, Alaska, February 13–15, 1979, Sea Grant Reports 81-3. Kodiak, Alaska: University of Alaska, pp. 89‒159.Google Scholar
Lalli, CM and Parsons, TR (1997) Biological Oceanography: An Introduction, 2nd Edn. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lo, NCH, Jacobson, LD and Squire, JL (1992) Indices of relative abundance from fish spotter data based on delta-lognominal models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49, 2515–2526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makarov, VV (1935) Beschreibung neuer Dekapoden-Formen aus den Meeren des Fernen Ostens. Zoologischer Anzeiger 109, 319–325.Google Scholar
Melo-Merino, SM, Reyes-Bonilla, H and Lira-Noriega, A (2020) Ecological niche models and species distribution models in marine environments: a literature review and spatial analysis of evidence. Ecological Modelling 415, 108837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naito, T, Sakuma, K and Yoshikawa, A (2024) Stock assessment and evaluation for Pandalus eous Sea of Japan stock (fiscal year 2023). Marine fisheries stock assessment and evaluation for Japanese waters. Japan Fisheries Agency and Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, Tokyo, 26 pp. (in press).Google Scholar
Pebesma, E (2018) Simple features for R: standardized support for spatial vector data. The R Journal 10, 439–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, B (2009) The correlation coefficient: its values range between +1/-1, or do they? Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 17, 139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rhodes, JR, McAlpine, CA, Zuur, AF, Smith, Gm and Ieno, EN (2009) GLMM applied on the spatial distribution of koalas in a fragmented landscape. In Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN, Walker, NJ, Saveliev, AA and Smith, GM (eds), Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Statistics for Biology and Health. New York: Springer, pp. 469‒492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, RL, McCumby, KI and Ferer, HM (1980) Food of Pandalus borealis, Pandalus hypsinotus and Pandalus goniurus (Pandalidae, Decapoda) from Lower Cook Inlet, Alaska. Proceedings of the National Shellfisheries Association 70, 47–54.Google Scholar
Robinson, NM, Nelson, WA, Costello, MJ, Sutherland, JE and Lundquist, CJ (2017) A systematic review of marine-based species distribution models (SDMs) with recommendations for best practice. Frontiers in Marine Science 4, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadakata, T (1999) On the growth of northern shrimp Pandalus eous in the waters off Noto Peninsula, the Sea of Japan. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 65, 1010–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadakata, T (2000a) On the breeding of northern shrimp Pandalus eous in the waters off Noto Peninsula, the Sea of Japan. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 66, 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadakata, T (2000b) On the vertical distribution and migration of northern shrimp Pandalus eous in the waters off Noto Peninsula, the Sea of Japan. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 66, 969–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Y and Ikehara, K (1992) Sediment discharge of Japanese rivers, and sedimentation rate and carbon content of marine sediments around the Japanese Islands. Chishitsu News 452, 59–64.Google Scholar
Shumway, SE, Perkins, HC, Schick, DE and Stickney, AE (1985) Synopsis of biological data of the pink shrimp Pandalus borealis (Krøyer, 1838). FAO Fisheries Synopsis 144, NOAA Technical Report of the National Marine Fisheries Service 30, 57 pp.Google Scholar
Sing, T, Sander, O, Beerenwinkel, N and Lengauer, T (2005) ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics 21, 7881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squires, HJ (1992) Recognition of Pandalus eous Makarov, 1935, as a Pacific species not a variety of the Atlantic Pandalus borealis Krøyer, 1838 (Decapoda, Caridea). Crustaceana 63, 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swets, JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240, 1285–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uda, M (1934) The results of simultaneous oceanographical investigations in the Japan Sea and its adjacent waters in May and June 1932. Japan Imperial Fisheries Experimental Station 5, 57–190.Google Scholar
Wigley, RL (1960) Note on the distribution of Pandalidae (Crustacea, Decapoda) in New England waters. Ecology 41, 564–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilk, MB and Gnanadesikan, R (1968) Probability plotting methods for the analysis of data. Biometrika 55, 1–17.Google ScholarPubMed
Wood, SN (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B) 73, 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasuda, S (1987) Distribution and ecology of the pink shrimp, Pandalus borealis Krøyer, in the Yamato Bank. Technical reports of Japan Marine Science and Technology Center – The 3rd symposium on deep sea research using the submergible ‘Shinkai 2000’ system 3, 267‒272.Google Scholar
Zainuddin, M, Saitoh, K and Saitoh, S (2008) Albacore (Thunnus alalunga) fishing ground in relation to oceanographic conditions in the western North Pacific Ocean using remotely sensed satellite data. Fisheries Oceanography 17, 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naito et al. supplementary material 1
Naito et al. supplementary material
File
154.2 KB
Naito et al. supplementary material 2
Naito et al. supplementary material
File
136.6 KB
Naito et al. supplementary material 3
Naito et al. supplementary material
File
80.8 KB
Naito et al. supplementary material 4
Naito et al. supplementary material
File
105.2 KB
Naito et al. supplementary material 5
Naito et al. supplementary material
File
2 MB