Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T22:13:55.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inhibition of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B and regulation of insulin signalling markers by caffeoyl derivatives of chicory (Cichorium intybus) salad leaves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2010

V. S. Muthusamy
Affiliation:
Centre for Biotechnology, Tissue Culture and Drug Discovery Laboratory, Anna University, Chennai 600 025, Tamil Nadu, India
C. Saravanababu
Affiliation:
Centre for Toxicology and Developmental Research, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai 600 116, Tamil Nadu, India
M. Ramanathan
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology, PSG College of Pharmacy, Coimbatore 641 004, Tamil Nadu, India
R. Bharathi Raja
Affiliation:
Centre for Biotechnology, Tissue Culture and Drug Discovery Laboratory, Anna University, Chennai 600 025, Tamil Nadu, India
S. Sudhagar
Affiliation:
Centre for Biotechnology, Tissue Culture and Drug Discovery Laboratory, Anna University, Chennai 600 025, Tamil Nadu, India
S. Anand
Affiliation:
Centre for Biotechnology, Tissue Culture and Drug Discovery Laboratory, Anna University, Chennai 600 025, Tamil Nadu, India
B. S. Lakshmi*
Affiliation:
Centre for Biotechnology, Tissue Culture and Drug Discovery Laboratory, Anna University, Chennai 600 025, Tamil Nadu, India
*
*Corresponding author: B. S. Lakshmi, fax +91 44 22350299, email lakshmibs@annauniv.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evaluations of molecular mechanisms of dietary plants with their active molecules are essential for the complete exploration of their nutritive and therapeutic value. In the present study, we investigated the effect of chicory (Cichorium intybus) salad leaves in inhibiting protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B), and evaluated their role in modulating the key markers involved in insulin cell signalling and adipogenesis using 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Bioactivity-directed purification studies enlightened the additive effects of chlorogenic acid (CGA) along with other caffeic acid derivatives present in methanolic extract of C. intybus (CME). Incubation of CME and CGA with 3T3-L1 adipocytes significantly enhanced the 2-deoxy-d-3[H]-glucose uptake and inhibited adipogenesis through altering the expressions of insulin signalling and adipogenesis markers. Extending to an in vivo model, the effect of CME was also investigated on insulin sensitivity in high-fat diet with low streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Supplementation of CME for 2 weeks reinstated the insulin sensitivity along with plasma metabolic profile. The present results demonstrate that the caffeoyl derivatives of chicory salad leaves show promising pharmacological effect on energy homoeostasis via PTP1B inhibition both in vitro and in vivo.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010
Figure 0

Fig. 1 (a) 2-Deoxy-d-3[H]-glucose uptake activities of the fractions obtained from methanolic extract of Cichorium intybus (CME; HAIS, hydroalcohol insoluble; HS, hexane soluble; CS, chloroform soluble; BS, butanol soluble; HAS, hydroalchol soluble). Differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes were preincubated with described doses of fractions for 24 h. The cells were subjected to 15 min insulin stimulation (10 nm), and then 0·018 MBq/ml of 2-deoxy-d-3[H]-glucose was added for 20 min and the uptake was measured. The results are expressed as percentage change in glucose uptake with respect to the solvent control (dimethyl sulphoxide). Data are expressed as means with their standard errors, n 3. * Mean values were significantly when compared with the untreated control group (P < 0·05). (b) Structure of chlorogenic acid (CGA) compound isolated from C. intybus through bioactivity-guided fractionation and (c) high-performance TLC chromatograms of CME and CGA at 330 nm. (a) □, 10 ng/ml; , 100 ng/ml; (), 1 μg/ml; ■, 10 μg/ml.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 (a) Dose–response analysis of methanolic extract of Cichorium intybus (CME, –▲–) and chlorogenic acid (CGA, –■–) in 2-deoxy-d-3[H]-glucose uptake activity. After experimental incubation of CME and CGA with differentiated 3T3-L1 adipocytes, the cells were subjected to 15 min insulin stimulation (10 nm). After buffer washing, 2-deoxy-d-3[H]-glucose (0·018 MBq/ml) was added to the cells for 20 min, and the uptake was measured. Data are expressed as means with their standard errors, n 3. * Mean values were significantly different when compared with the untreated control group (P < 0·05). (b)–(g) Western blot analysis of insulin signalling markers insulin receptor β (IRβ), insulin receptor substrate (IRS-1), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase B (PKB/Akt), glycogen synthase kinase (GSK-3β) and GLUT4 using whole-cell lysate of CME- and CGA-treated 3T3-L1 adipocytes at different time points from 12 to 36 h. (h) Protein expressions were normalised by β-actin.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 Effect of methanolic extract of Cichorium intybus (CME, ) and chlorogenic acid (CGA, ■) on adipogenesis. (a) CME and CGA suppress lipid accumulation in maturing preadipocytes during incubation for a whole spectrum of differentiation periods. Preadipocytes were separately maintained using a protocol as indicated. Data that are shown reflect the means with their standard errors of triplicates of two determinations. * Mean values were significantly different when compared with the preadipocyte group (P < 0·05). Cellular TAG was stained with the AdipoRed® reagent, and the fluorescent lipid droplets (white dots) were photomicrographed at 10 ×  magnification. (b) Control; (c) differentiation induced; (d) differentiation medium+CME (100 ng/ml); (e) differentiation medium+CGA (100 ng/ml). (f)–(h) RT-PCR analysis of adipogenic genes CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBPα, 224 bp), PPARg (155 bp) and sterol-regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP-1c, 222 bp) at different time points (624 h) in CME- and CGA-treated 3T3-L1 adipocytes. (i) mRNA of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in the same sample was used as a loading reference.

Figure 3

Fig. 4 Effect of methanolic extract of Cichorium intybus (CME, –♦–) and chlorogenic acid (CGA, –■–) on inhibition of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) enzyme. CME and CGA showed a dose-dependent inhibition of PTP1B enzyme with the IC50 of 21·2 ng (–♦–) and 3·82 mg (–■–), respectively.

Figure 4

Fig. 5 Effect of methanolic extract of Cichorium intybus (CME, 125 mg/kg body weight) on (a) body weight and (b) feed intake behaviour of experimental rats. Values are expressed as means with their standard errors, n 6. Mean values were significantly different from those when compared with the normoglycaemic group (–■–): †P = 0·05, ††P = 0·01. –□–, Hyperglycaemic group; , hyperglycaemic+CME group.

Figure 5

Table 1 Effect of methanolic extract of Cichorium intybus (CME, 125 mg/kg body weight) on various biochemical parameters in high-fat diet with low streptozotocin-treated rats(Mean values with their standard errors, n 6)

Figure 6

Fig. 6 (a)–(f) Effect of methanolic extract of Cichorium intybus (CME) administration (125 mg/kg body weight) on protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B), insulin receptor (IRβ), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase B (PKB/Akt), glycogen synthase kinase (GSK-3β) and GLUT4 expressions in rat skeletal muscle, respectively. (g) Protein expressions were normalised by β-actin. N, normoglycaemic; H, hyperglycaemic; CME, CME treated.

Figure 7

Fig. 7 Effect of methanolic extract of Cichorium intybus (CME) treatment on (a) hepatic and (b) skeletal muscle glycogen content. Values are expressed as means with their standard errors, n 6. Mean values were significantly different from those when compared with the hyperglycaemic group (): *P = 0·05 **P = 0·01. Mean values were significantly different from those when compared with the normoglycaemic group (□): ††P = 0·05. , Hyperglycaemic+CME group.

Figure 8

Fig. 8 Effect of methanolic extract of Cichorium intybus (CME) on (a) hepatic glucose-6-phosphatase (G6P) and (b) F16BP enzyme levels in diabetic rats. Value are expressed as means with their standard errors, n 6. Mean values were significantly different from those when compared with the hyperglycaemic group (): *P = 0·01. Mean values were significantly different from those when compared with the normoglycaemic group (□): ††P = 0·05. , Hyperglycaemic+CME group.