Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-h8lrw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T11:10:31.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of age and apoE genotype on the fasting and postprandial TAG response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2010

A. L. Carvalho-Wells ,
G. Gill-Garrison ,
E. Olano-Martin ,
K. G. Jackson  and
A. M. Minihane
A. L. Carvalho-Wells
Affiliation:
Department of Food Biosciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AP, UK
G. Gill-Garrison
Affiliation:
Sciona Inc, Boulder, CO 80302, USA
E. Olano-Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Food Biosciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AP, UK
K. G. Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of Food Biosciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AP, UK
A. M. Minihane
Affiliation:
Department of Food Biosciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AP, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Carriers of the apoE4 allele have been shown to have increased risk of CVD by as much as 40–50%(Reference Minihane, Jofre-Monseny and Olano-Martin1). Traditionally this increased risk has been attributable to higher total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. However, the modest increases in TC and LDL-C observed in apoE4 carriers relative to the common apoE3 genotype cannot fully explain the greater CVD risk in this subgroup. The current study examined the impact of apoE genotype on the fasting and postprandial TAG response.

Healthy men (n 145) and women (n 109) with a mean age of 53 (se 1.0) years, BMI of 26.4 (se 0.2) kg/m2) and fasted triacylglycerol (TAG) of 1.63 mmol/l (se 0.05) underwent a postprandial assessment. After consumption of a standard breakfast (time 0 min, 49 g fat) and lunch (time 330 min, 29 g fat), blood samples were taken at regular intervals until 8 h post-breakfast for analysis of fasting lipids and postprandial TAG using automated colorimetric assays. Genotype groups were arranged as E2 carriers (E2/E2 and E2/E3, n 47), E4 carriers (E4/E4 and E4/E3, n 66) and homozygous E3/E3 (n 142).

Fasting TAG was shown to be 17% and 26% higher in E2 and E4 carriers relative to the E3/E3 genotype (P=0.001). This trend was also evident in the postprandial TAG response with a 13% and 22% higher area under the curve (AUC) in E2 and E4 carriers (P=0.038). As age has been shown to influence the magnitude of the postprandial TAG response, the subjects were subdivided into a younger (⩽50 years) and older (≥51 years) group. A significant impact of apoE genotype on both fasted TAG (P=0.053) and postprandial TAG AUC (P=0.028) was observed in the older group with higher levels in E4 carriers relative to the wild-type E3/E3 group. However, this relationship was not evident in the younger cohort (⩽50 years).

Figure.

Fasting TAG levels (A) and AUC for the postprandial TAG response (B) in the three genotype groups. Data are presented for the group as a whole and for the two age-groups (⩽50 years and >50 years). a,bMeans with unlike superscript letters were significantly different between the genotype groups (P<0.05).

The data suggest that age partly determines the impact of apoE genotype on TAG concentrations. The molecular basis for higher TAG in E4 carriers is unknown, but may be in part a result of the reported lower recycling of internalised apoE to the hepatocyte surface(Reference Heeren, Grewal and Laatsch2), which would lower the concentration of apoE ligand available for TAG-rich lipoprotein internalisation by the liver. Further investigations in to molecular mechanisms are warranted.

References

1. Minihane, AM, Jofre-Monseny, L, Olano-Martin, E et al. . (2007) Proc Nutr Soc 66, 183–197.Google Scholar
2. Heeren, J, Grewal, T, Laatsch, A et al. . (2004) J. Biol. Chem 279 (53), 55483–55492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure. Fasting TAG levels (A) and AUC for the postprandial TAG response (B) in the three genotype groups. Data are presented for the group as a whole and for the two age-groups (⩽50 years and >50 years). a,bMeans with unlike superscript letters were significantly different between the genotype groups (P<0.05).