Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-mmrw7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T10:28:12.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impact of protein-rich meals on glycaemic response of rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Rina Quek
Affiliation:
Clinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore 117599, Singapore
Xinyan Bi
Affiliation:
Clinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore 117599, Singapore
Christiani Jeyakumar Henry*
Affiliation:
Clinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, 14 Medical Drive, Singapore 117599, Singapore Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 30 Medical Drive, Singapore 117609, Singapore Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 8 Medical Drive, Singapore 117596, Singapore
*
* Corresponding author: C. J. Henry, fax +65 6776 6840, email jeya_henry@sics.a-star.edu.sg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Asians typically consume carbohydrate-rich and high-glycaemic-index diets that have been associated with an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Rice is rarely eaten alone such that it is of interest to investigate the effects of co-ingesting different protein-rich meals with rice on insulin and glycaemic response. This study had a randomised, controlled, non-blind, cross-over design in which fifteen healthy Chinese male participants were required to come on non-consecutive days. Five rice-based test meals were served: rice alone (control), rice with fish (RWF), rice with egg white (RWE), rice with soya beancurd (taukwa) (RWT) and rice with chicken (RWC). The control meal consisted of 50 g of available carbohydrate, whereas all other test meals contained additional 25 g of protein. RWT was the only meal that showed significantly lower glucose response when compared with the control (P<0·05). RWF and RWE had significantly higher insulin response, but no significant increase was observed in RWT and RWC when compared with the control (P<0·05). RWT and RWF showed significantly higher glucagon secretion as compared with the control (P<0·05). The four test meals studied showed varying effects, with RWT showing the greatest reduction in glycaemic response. Therefore, the ingestion of soya beancurd with rice may have a direct impact on reducing the risk in Asians transiting from being pre-diabetics to diabetics.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 
Figure 0

Table 1 Nutrient composition and serving sizes of the test meals

Figure 1

Fig. 1 (a) Changes in plasma glucose of fifteen healthy male volunteers after consumption of five different test meals: rice (Control, ), rice with fish (RWF, ), rice with egg white (RWE, ), rice with soya beancurd (taukwa) (RWT, ) and rice with chicken (RWC, ), respectively, following the standardised dinner. (b) Net incremental AUC (iAUC) using fasting values as baseline. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Significantly different when compared with control meal using repeated-measures test: P<0·05.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 (a) Changes in plasma insulin of fifteen healthy male volunteers after consumption of five different test meals: rice (Control, ), rice with fish (RWF, ), rice with egg white (RWE, ), rice with soya beancurd (taukwa) (RWT, ) and rice with chicken (RWC, ), respectively, following the standardised dinner. (b) Net incremental AUC (iAUC) using fasting values as baseline. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Significantly different when compared with control meal using repeated-measures test: P<0·05.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 (a) Changes in plasma glucagon of fifteen healthy male volunteers after consumption of five different test meals: rice (Control, ), rice with fish (RWF, ), rice with egg white (RWE, ), rice with soya beancurd (taukwa) (RWT, ) and rice with chicken (RWC, ), respectively, following the standardised dinner. (b) Net incremental AUC (iAUC) using fasting values as baseline. Values are means, with standard errors represented by vertical bars. * Significantly different when compared with control meal using repeated-measures test: P<0·05.

Figure 4

Table 2 Amino acid levels in different protein sources

Figure 5

Table 3 Spearman’s correlation coefficients and P values for the relations between branched chain amino acids (BCAA):essential amino acids ratio and glycaemic response of different test meals

Supplementary material: File

Quek supplementary material

Table S1

Download Quek supplementary material(File)
File 14 KB