Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T11:04:36.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘A very diadem of light’: exhibitions in Victorian London, the Parliamentary light and the shaping of the Trinity House lighthouses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2017

STEPHEN COURTNEY*
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge, CB2 3RH, UK. Email: sac89@cam.ac.uk.

Abstract

In the midsummer of 1872 a lighthouse apparatus was installed in the Clock Tower of the House of Commons. The installation served the practical function of communicating at a distance when the House was sitting, but also provided a highly visible symbolic indication of the importance of lighthouse technology to national concerns. Further, the installation served as an experimental space in which rival technological designs, with corresponding visions for the lighthouse system, could compete in public. This article considers nineteenth-century lighthouse technology as a case study in the power and political significance of display. Manufacturers of lighthouse lenses, such as the firm of Chance Brothers, sought to manage interpretations of the lights through the framing of exhibitions and demonstrations; so too did scientific authorities, including Michael Faraday and John Tyndall, both of whom served in the role of scientific adviser to Trinity House, the body responsible for lighthouse management. Particularly notable in this process was the significance of urban, metropolitan display environments in shaping the development of the marine lighthouse system around the nation's periphery.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society for the History of Science 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Morus, Iwan, ‘Manufacturing nature: science, technology and Victorian consumer culture’, BJHS (1996) 29, pp. 403434 Google Scholar; Lightman, Bernard and Fyfe, Aileen (eds.), Science in the Marketplace, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007 Google Scholar; Lightman, Bernard, Victorian Popularizers of Science, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007 Google Scholar; Morus, Iwan, ‘Worlds of wonder: sensation and the Victorian scientific performance’, Isis (2010) 101, pp. 806816 Google Scholar; Morus, ‘Illuminating illusions, or, the Victorian art of seeing things’, Early Popular Visual Culture (2012) 10, pp. 3750 Google Scholar; Lightman, Bernard, ‘Victorian science and popular visual culture’, Early Popular Visual Culture (2012) 10, pp. 15 Google Scholar; Kember, Joe, Plunkett, John and Sullivan, Jill (eds.), Popular Exhibitions, Science, and Showmanship 1840–1910, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2012 Google Scholar.

2 Gooding, David, ‘“In nature's school”: Faraday as an experimentalist’, in Gooding, David and James, Frank (eds.), Faraday Rediscovered: Essays on the Life and Work of Michael Faraday, 1791–1867, London: Macmillan, 1985, pp. 105135 Google Scholar; Schaffer, Simon, ‘Transport phenomena: space and visibility in Victorian physics’, Early Popular Visual Culture (2012) 10, pp. 7191 Google Scholar; Morus, Iwan, Michael Faraday and the Electrical Century, Cambridge: Icon Books, 2004 Google Scholar.

3 ‘The electric light at the Houses of Parliament’, Illustrated London News, 16 August 1873, pp. 149–150. The Clock Tower exhibition is profiled in Sarah Dry, ‘Chapter of accidents: science, safety and government in mid-Victorian Britain’, PhD dissertation, Cambridge, 2006.

4 ‘The electric light’, op. cit. (3), pp. 149–150.

5 Eve, Arthur and Creasey, Clarence, Life and Work of John Tyndall, London: Macmillan & Co, 1945 Google Scholar; Schiffer, Michael, ‘The electric lighthouse in the nineteenth century’, Technology and Culture (2005) 46, pp. 275305 Google Scholar; MacLeod, Roy, ‘Science and government in Victorian England’, Isis (1969) 60, pp. 438 Google Scholar.

6 Influential interpretations of the exhibition's contents include Richards, Thomas, The Commodity Culture of Victorian England, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990 Google Scholar; Hoffenberg, Peter, An Empire on Display, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001 Google Scholar; Auerbach, Jeffrey and Hoffenberg, Peter (eds.), Britain, the Empire and the World at the Great Exhibition of 1851, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 2008 Google Scholar; Johansen, Sylvi, ‘The Great Exhibition of 1851: a precipice in time?’, Victorian Review (1996) 22, pp. 5964 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cantor, Geoffrey, Religion and the Great Exhibition of 1851, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011 Google Scholar; Cantor, ‘Providence and progress at the Great Exhibition’, Isis (2012) 103, pp. 439459 Google Scholar.

7 For Chance Brothers see Levitt, Theresa, A Short Bright Flash, London: W.W. Norton & Company, 2013 Google Scholar; Chance, Toby and Williams, Peter, Lighthouses: The Race to Illuminate the World, London: New Holland, 2008 Google Scholar; Chance, James Frederick, A History of the Firm of Chance Brothers & Co., London: Smith, Elder, & Co., 1902 Google Scholar; Armstrong, Isobel, Victorian Glassworlds, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008 Google Scholar.

8 Jackson, Myles, Spectrum of Belief, Boston, MA: MIT Press, 2000 Google Scholar; Armstrong, op. cit. (7).

9 ‘Lighthouses and lighthouse optical equipment’, Illustrated London News, 21 June 1851, p. 593.

10 Robert Hunt, ‘On the application of science to the fine and useful arts’, Art Journal, December 1851, p. 324.

11 Stevenson, Alan, Account of the Skerryvore lighthouse, Edinburgh: Adam and Charles Black, 1848, p. 270 Google Scholar.

12 Levitt, op. cit. (7); Elton, Julia, ‘A light to lighten our darkness: lighthouse optics and the later development of Fresnel's revolutionary refracting lens 1780–1900’, International Journal for the History of Engineering & Technology (2009) 79, pp. 183244 Google Scholar; Chance and Williams, op. cit. (7).

13 ‘General sketch of the British Contributions’, The Observer, 12 May 1851, p. 2.

14 ‘The gems of the exhibition: glass’, The Observer, 16 June 1851, p. 4.

15 ‘A lecture by Faraday’, Leader and Saturday Analyst, 17 March 1860, p. 255.

16 ‘A lecture by Faraday’, op. cit. (15), p. 255.

17 Brewster, David, ‘British lighthouse system’, Edinburgh Review (1833) 57, pp. 169–93Google Scholar.

18 ‘Report from the Select Committee on Lighthouses; with the minutes of evidence, and an appendix and index’, 1834, Parliamentary Papers, XII.1; ‘Lighthouses. A Bill for Vesting Lighthouses and Lights on the coasts of England in the Corporation of Trinity House of Deptford Strond, and for making provisions respecting lighthouses, lights, buoys, beacons and seamarks, and the tolls and duties payable in respect thereof’, 1836, Parliamentary Papers, IV.319, 351.

19 James, Frank, ‘“The civil engineer's talent”: Michael Faraday, science, engineering and the English lighthouse service, 1836–1865’, Transactions of the Newcomen Society (1998–1999) 70, pp. 153160 Google Scholar; James, ‘Michael Faraday and lighthouses’, in Inkster, Ian, Griffin, Colin, Hill, Jeff and Rowbotham, Judith (eds.), The Golden Age: Essays in British Social and Economic History, 1850–1870, Aldershot: Routledge, 2000, pp. 92104 Google Scholar; MacLeod, op. cit. (5), pp. 4–38; Adams, Andrew and Woodman, Richard, Light upon the Waters: The History of Trinity House 1514–2014, London: Trinity House, 2013 Google Scholar.

20 ‘Report of the commissioners appointed to inquire into the condition and management of lights, buoys, and beacons. Together with a letter from Rear-Admiral W.A.B. Hamilton, chairman of the commission, and appendix and index. Vol. I’, 1861, Parliamentary Papers, XXV.1.

21 James, ‘The civil engineer's talent’, op. cit. (19); James, ‘Michael Faraday’, op. cit. (19); Cantor, Geoffrey, Faraday: Sandemanian and Scientist, London: Macmillan, 1991 Google Scholar; Levere, T.H., ‘Faraday, matter, and natural theology: reflections on an unpublished manuscript’, BJHS (1968) 4, pp. 95107 Google Scholar.

22 Cantor, op. cit. (21).

23 Faraday, Michael, ‘Lighthouse illumination: the electric light’, published as an addendum to Faraday, Six Lectures on the Various Forces of Matter and Their Relations to Each Other (ed. Crookes, William), London: Richard Griffin and Company, 1860, pp. 155174 Google Scholar, 155.

24 Faraday, op. cit. (23), p. 155.

25 Faraday, op. cit. (23), pp. 172–173.

26 The Correspondence of Michael Faraday (ed. James, Frank), vol. 4: 1849–1855, London: IET, 1999, pp. 746754 Google Scholar. See also James, ‘Civil engineer's talent’, op. cit. (19).

27 Faraday, op. cit. (23), pp. 173–174.

28 Faraday, op. cit. (23), p. 171.

29 The Correspondence of Michael Faraday (ed. James, Frank), vol. 5: 1855–1860, London: IET, 2008, pp. 711718 Google Scholar.

30 George Airy to James Chance, 28 June 1860, Sandwell Local History and Archives Centre, Smethwick, BS6/12/5/4, p. 2.

31 Correspondence of Michael Faraday, op. cit. (29), pp. 746–748.

32 Levitt, op. cit. (7); Chance and Williams, op. cit. (7); ‘Report’, op. cit. (20).

33 ‘A lecture by Faraday’, op. cit. (15), pp. 255–256.

34 The Correspondence of Michael Faraday (ed. James, Frank), vol. 6: 1861–1867, London: IET, 2012, p. 450 Google Scholar.

35 Turner, Frank, Contesting Cultural Authority, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993 Google Scholar; DeYoung, Ursula, A Vision of Modern Science, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011 Google Scholar; Barton, Ruth, ‘“Huxley, Lubbock, and half a dozen others”: professionals and gentlemen in the formation of the X Club, 1851–1864’, Isis (1998) 89, pp. 410444 Google Scholar; Barton, ‘“An influential set of chaps”: the X-Club and Royal Society politics 1864–85’, BJHS (1990) 23, pp. 5381 Google Scholar; White, Paul, Thomas Huxley: Making the ‘Man of Science’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

36 Yamalidou, Maria, ‘John Tyndall, the rhetorician of molecularity, part one: crossing the boundary towards the invisible’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society (1999) 53, pp. 231343 Google Scholar; Yamalidou, ‘John Tyndall, the rhetorician of molecularity, part two: questions put to nature’, Notes and Records of the Royal Society (1999) 53, pp. 319331 Google Scholar; Schaffer, op. cit. (2).

37 Tyndall, ‘The electric light’, Fortnightly Review (1879) 146, p. 200 Google Scholar.

38 Tyndall, op. cit. (37), p. 199.

39 Turner, Frank, ‘John Tyndall and Victorian scientific naturalism’, in Brock, William (ed.), John Tyndall: Essays on a Natural Philosopher, Dublin: Royal Dublin Society: 1981, pp. 169181 Google Scholar; Gieryn, Thomas, Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999 Google Scholar; Barton, Ruth, ‘John Tyndall, pantheist: a rereading of the Belfast address’, Osiris (1987) 3, pp. 111134 Google Scholar.

40 Tyndall, op. cit. (37), p. 216.

41 Tyndall, op. cit. (37), p. 206.

42 Tyndall, John, ‘A story of our lighthouses’, Nineteenth Century (1888) 24, p. 69 Google Scholar.

43 ‘Galley Head lighthouse. Copy of report to the Commissioners of Irish Lights, by Professor Tyndall, F.R.S, of an Inspection of Galley Head Lighthouse on 9th day of May 1879; together with observations on that report by the inspector of lights and the engineer to the Irish Lighthouse Board’, 1878–1879, Parliamentary Paper, LXIV.65, p. 3.

44 John Percy to Acton Smee Ayrton, 23 June 1868, National Archives, WORK 11 161, pp. 1–2.

45 ‘Signal light at the Houses of Parliament’, The Times, 8 January 1873, p. 5.

46 ‘Signal light’, op. cit. (45).

47 John Wigham to Acton Smee Ayrton, 9 January 1873; John Percy to Captain Galton, 19 February 1873, Signal Light (Ayrton Light), National Archives, Kew, WORK 11 161, p. 1.

48 ‘The new House of Commons signal light’, The Times, 19 April 1873, p. 6.

49 ‘Electric light at Westminster Palace’, The Times, 7 May 1873, p. 7.

50 ‘The electric light at the Houses of Parliament’, The Standard, 15 May 1873, p. 3.

51 ‘Punch's essence of Parliament’, Punch, 28 June 1873, p. 264; ‘The electric light’, op. cit. (50).

52 ‘Houses of Parliament (signal lights). Copy of report made by Mr. Douglass (engineer of the corporation of the Trinity House) to Her Majesty's office of works, on the comparative merits of the signal lights used on the clock tower of the Houses of Parliament during the session of 1873’, 1874, Parliamentary Papers, LI.863, pp. 1–6.

53 ‘Electric and gas lights’, 15 July 1873, Signal Light (Ayrton Light), National Archives, WORK 11 161 p. 12.

54 ‘Electric and gas lights’, op. cit. (53), pp. 1–28.

55 ‘Houses of Parliament (signal lights). Copy of letter from Mr. J.R. Wigham to Her Majesty's Office of Works, in reference to the report by Mr. Douglass on the comparative merits of the signal lights used on the clock tower of the Houses of Parliament during the session of 1873’, 1875, Parliamentary Papers, LX.171, pp. 1–6.

56 ‘Annual international exhibitions’, Journal of the Society of Arts, 30 October 1874, pp. 978–984, 984; E. Price Edwards, ‘The experiments with lighthouse illuminants at the South Foreland’, Journal of the Society of Arts, 12 March 1886, pp. 418–439, 422; MacLeod, op. cit. (5), p. 26.

57 ‘Galley Head lighthouse’, op. cit. (43), p. 3.

58 MacLeod, op. cit. (5), pp. 27–29.

59 Preece, William, ‘Address’, Journal of the Society of Arts (1901) 50(4), pp. 822 Google Scholar, 13.

60 ‘A night with Big Ben’, Leisure Hour, 12 September 1874, pp. 582–583.

61 ‘The clock and bell of Westminster’, Chambers’ Journal of Popular Literature, Science and Arts, 3 August 1878, pp. 487–490, 489.

62 John Wigham to David Plunket, 2 April 1892, Signal Light (Ayrton Light), National Archives, Kew, WORK 11 161, p. 1; Hansard: HC Deb, 16 March 1893, vol. 10, c. 210.

63 William Prim, ‘The electric light for lighthouses’, The Times, 27 December 1901, 4.