Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-zlvph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T07:54:13.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ice-core insights into the flow and shut-down of Ice Stream C,West Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Donald E. Voigt
Affiliation:
EMS Environment Institute and Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-7501, U.S.A. E-mail: voigt@geosc.psu.edu
Richard B. Alley
Affiliation:
EMS Environment Institute and Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-7501, U.S.A. E-mail: voigt@geosc.psu.edu
Sridhar Anandakrishnan
Affiliation:
EMS Environment Institute and Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-7501, U.S.A. E-mail: voigt@geosc.psu.edu
Matthew K. Spencer
Affiliation:
EMS Environment Institute and Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-7501, U.S.A. E-mail: voigt@geosc.psu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vigorous flow of central regions of Ice Stream C, West Antarctica,near the UpC camp ended about the year 1830,based on analysis of a firn and ice core taken at the camp. Ice-stream flow was characterized by repeated fracturing and healing,probably subsurface,especially near the onset of streaming flow. High longitudinal stresses caused fracturing,recrystallization of the ice and elongation of bubbles,and enhanced densification rates of high-density firn indicating power-law-creep behavior.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) [year] 2003
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location sketch map of the Siple Coast of West Antarcti showing general area of ice streams and location of cores taken from UpC, UpB, BC and Siple Dome.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Density–depth data from UpC core. Data points at surface and 1m depth were calculated by averaging the measured ca densities of snow samples taken from a pit. Other points represent the measured density of the core determined in the field. Depth is taken as the top of a sample interval.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Density–depth relationships in 1.7 m snow pit. Density is calculated from weight of firn sample taken with snow-density box (see text). Years indicate summer layers based visual observation in the snow pit and measured density.surface represents the summer of 1996.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Age-depth relationship ofUpC core obtained by summing annual layers as determined by visual stratigraphy to a depth where annual layers were no longer discernible. Solid lines indicate melt layers observed in the core during visual logging.Deeper melt layers (to 50 m) in ice of uncertain age are not shown.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. (a) Angle of bed dip (degrees from horizontal) vs depth; (b) number of fractures per meter of core vs depth.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Photograph of a section from the UpC core at 104.32 m depth looking down the axis of the core (sample for thin section was removed after core was cut in half for archiving). Note orientation of the elongated bubbles and fracture traces. Because of the thickness of the section and the slight inclination of the feature, some subsurface bubbles appear in the bubble-free zone around the fracture trace described in the text. The photo was taken by J. J. Fitzpatrick.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Depth–density relationships of UpC core (points) overlain by curves from Alley and Bentley (1988) for BC and UpB.