Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-v2srd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T10:41:22.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field experience with surgical castration with anaesthesia, analgesia, immunocastration and production of entire male pigs: performance, carcass traits and boar taint prevalence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2014

M. Aluwé ,
F. A. M. Tuyttens  and
S. Millet
M. Aluwé*
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium
F. A. M. Tuyttens
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium
S. Millet
Affiliation:
Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, 9090 Melle, Belgium
*
† E-mail: marijke.aluwe@ilvo.vlaanderen.be
Get access

Abstract

Male piglets are castrated to reduce boar taint and also to reduce aggressive and sexual behaviour. However, the procedure as traditionally performed is painful and negatively affects performance. Large-scale results about the consequences of implementing alternatives on farms are lacking. We, therefore, investigated the practical applicability of the following five alternatives that can be implemented in the short term: surgical castration (1) without pain relief (CONT, control group), (2) with analgesia (MET, Metacam, 0.2 ml, 10 to 15 min before castration), (3) with general anaesthesia (CO2, inhalation, 100% CO2, 25 s, 3 l/min), (4) vaccination against boar taint (IM, two injections with Improvac) and (5) production of entire males (EM). The study consisted of the following two trials: (1) an experimental farm trial with 18 animals/treatment and (2) a large field trial on 20 farms with ~120 male pigs/farm per treatment and all treatments performed on each farm. Performance results as well as data on carcass traits, boar taint (hot-iron method) and testes development and weight were collected in both trials. Neither castration nor administration of analgesia or anaesthesia had an effect on daily gain of the piglets in the farrowing crates (P>0.05). Farmer records indicated that mortality in the farrowing crates (1.1%), nursery pens (1.8%) and fattening stable (2.2%) was not influenced by MET or CO2 compared with EM, IM or CONT (P>0.05). No significant differences were found for daily gain (P>0.05) nor slaughter age (P>0.05). Immunocastrates and EM had a better gain-to-feed ratio (P<0.05) compared with the groups of barrows (CONT, MET and CO2). Lean meat percentage was higher for EM compared with the barrows, and intermediate for IM (P<0.05). Carcass yield was lowest for IM (P<0.05). The hot-iron method indicated that boar taint was eliminated in barrows and IM compared with EM (P<0.001). Average prevalence of strong boar taint was 3% for EM, but varied from 0% to 14% between farms. As the effect of treatment on performance as well as the level of boar taint of EM was farm dependent, farmers should be encouraged to pre-test the different alternatives in order to make a well-considered choice for the best practical and profitable alternative for their farm.

Keywords

boar taintcastrationentire malesimmunocastrationperformance

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 9 , Supplement 3 , March 2015 , pp. 500 - 508
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aluwé, M, Langendries, KCM, Bekaert, KM, Tuyttens, FAM, De Brabander, DL, De Smet, S and Millet, S 2013. Effect of surgical castration, immunocastration and chicory-diet on the meat quality and palatability of boars. Meat Science 94, 402–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batorek, N, Candek-Potokar, M, Bonneau, M and Van Milgen, J 2012a. Meta-analysis of the effect of immunocastration on production performance, reproductive organs and boar taint compounds in pigs. Animal 6, 1330–1338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batorek, N, Skrlep, M, Prunier, A, Louveau, I, Noblet, J, Bonneau, M and Candek-Potokar, M 2012b. Effect of feed restriction on hormones, performance, carcass traits, and meat quality in immunocastrated pigs. Journal of Animal Science 90, 4593–4603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boler, DD, Killefer, J, Meeuwse, DM, King, VL, McKeith, FK and Dilger, AC 2012. Effects of slaughter time post-second injection on carcass cutting yields and bacon characteristics of immunologically castrated male pigs. Journal of Animal Science 90, 334–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonneau, M 1998. Use of entire males for pig meat in the European Union. Meat Science 49, S257–S272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Souza, DN and Mullan, BP 2003. The effect of genotype and castration method on the eating quality characteristics of pork from male pigs. Animal Science 77, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunshea, FR, Colantoni, C, Howard, K, McCauley, I, Jackson, P, Long, KA, Lopaticki, S, Nugent, EA, Simons, JA, Walker, J and Hennessy, DP 2001. Vaccination of boars with a GnRH vaccine (Improvac) eliminates boar taint and increases growth performance. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2524–2535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Declaration on Alternatives to Surgical Castration of Pigs 2010. Retrieved November, 25 2014, from http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/farm/docs/castration_pigs_declaration_en.pdf Google Scholar
Fredriksen, B, Furnols, MFI, Lundstrom, K, Migdal, W, Prunier, A, Tuyttens, FAM and Bonneau, M 2009. Practice on castration of piglets in Europe. Animal 3, 1480–1487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furnols, M, Gispert, M, Soler, J, Diaz, M, Garcia-Regueiro, JA, Diaz, I and Pearce, MC 2012. Effect of vaccination against gonadotrophin-releasing factor on growth performance, carcass, meat and fat quality of male Duroc pigs for dry-cured ham production. Meat Science 91, 148–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerritzen, MA, Kluivers-Poodt, M, Reimert, HGM, Hindle, V and Lambooij, E 2008. Castration of piglets under CO2-gas anaesthesia. Animal 2, 1666–1673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gispert, M, Oliver, MA, Velarde, A, Suarez, P, Perez, J and Furnols, MFI 2010. Carcass and meat quality characteristics of immunocastrated male, surgically castrated male, entire male and female pigs. Meat Science 85, 664–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kluivers-Poodt, M, Houx, BB, Robben, SRM, Koop, G, Lambooij, E and Hellebrekers, LJ 2012. Effects of a local anaesthetic and NSAID in castration of piglets, on the acute pain responses, growth and mortality. Animal 6, 1469–1475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lealiifano, AK, Pluske, JR, Nicholls, RR, Dunshea, FR, Campbell, RG, Hennessy, DP, Miller, DW, Hansen, CF and Mullan, BP 2011. Reducing the length of time between slaughter and the secondary gonadotropin-releasing factor immunization improves growth performance and clears boar taint compounds in male finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 89, 2782–2792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundstrom, K, Matthews, KR and Haugen, JE 2009. Pig meat quality from entire males. Animal 3, 1497–1507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGlone, JJ, Nicholson, RI, Hellman, JM and Herzog, DN 1993. The development of pain in young-pigs associated with castration and attempts to prevent castration-induced behavioral-changes. Journal of Animal Science 71, 1441–1446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Millet, S, Gielkens, K, De Brabander, D and Janssens, GPJ 2011. Considerations on the performance of immunocastrated male pigs. Animal 5, 1119–1123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales, J, Gispert, M, Hortos, M, Perez, J, Suarez, P and Pineiro, C 2010. Evaluation of production performance and carcass quality characteristics of boars immunised against gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) compared with physically castrated male, entire male and female pigs. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, JI, Camara, L, Berrocoso, JD, Lopez, JP, Mateos, GG and Serrano, MP 2011. Influence of sex and castration on growth performance and carcass quality of crossbred pigs from 2 Large White sire lines. Journal of Animal Science 89, 3481–3489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morales, JI, Serrano, MP, Camara, L, Berrocoso, JD, Lopez, JP and Mateos, GG 2013. Growth performance and carcass quality of immunocastrated and surgically castrated pigs from crossbreds from Duroc and Pietrain sires. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3955–3964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pauly, C, Luginbuhl, W, Ampuero, S and Bee, G 2012. Expected effects on carcass and pork quality when surgical castration is omitted – results of a meta-analysis study. Meat Science 92, 858–862.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pauly, C, Spring, P, O’Doherty, JV, Kragten, SA and Bee, G 2009. Growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of group-penned surgically castrated, immunocastrated (Improvac®) and entire male pigs and individually penned entire male pigs. Animal 3, 1057–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prunier, A, Bonneau, M, von Borell, EH, Cinotti, S, Gunn, M, Fredriksen, B, Giersing, M, Morton, DB, Tuyttens, FAM and Velarde, A 2006. A review of the welfare consequences of surgical castration in piglets and the evaluation of non-surgical methods. Animal Welfare 15, 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robic, A, Larzul, C and Bonneau, M 2008. Genetic and metabolic aspects of androstenone and skatole deposition in pig adipose tissue: a review. Genetics Selection Evolution 40, 129–143.Google ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, T, Konig, A and von Borell, E 2012. Impact of general injection anaesthesia and analgesia on post-castration behaviour and teat order of piglets. Animal 6, 1998–2002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmidt, T, Calabrese, JM, Grodzycki, M, Paulick, M, Pearce, MC, Rau, F and von Borell, E 2011. Impact of single-sex and mixed-sex group housing of boars vaccinated against GnRF or physically castrated on body lesions, feeding behaviour and weight gain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 130, 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrlep, M, Segula, B, Zajec, M, Kastelic, M, Kosorok, S, Fazarinc, G and Candek-Potokar, M 2010. Effect of immunocastration (Improvac®) in fattening pigs I: growth performance, reproductive organs and malodorous compounds. Slovenian Veterinary Research 47, 57–64.Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA, Davis, BL, Brooks, TA and Coetzee, JF 2012. The physiological and behavioral response of pigs castrated with and without anesthesia or analgesia. Journal of Animal Science 90, 2211–2221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Milgen, J, Quiniou, N and Noblet, J 2000. Modelling the relation between energy intake and protein and lipid deposition in growing pigs. Animal Science 71, 119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, U, Gotz, M, Schmidt, A, Otto, M and Muller, S 2013. Influence of sex and immunocastration on feed intake behavior, skatole and indole concentrations in adipose tissue of pigs. Animal 7, 300–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamaratskaia, G and Squires, EJ 2009. Biochemical, nutritional and genetic effects on boar taint in entire male pigs. Animal 3, 1508–1521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Aluwé Supplementary Material

Figure S1

Download Aluwé Supplementary Material(File)
File 276.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Aluwé Supplementary Material

Figure S2

Download Aluwé Supplementary Material(File)
File 294.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Aluwé Supplementary Material

Figure S3

Download Aluwé Supplementary Material(File)
File 283.8 KB