Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-pn7tm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T14:42:05.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of creatine supplementation on homocysteine levels and lipid peroxidation in rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2008

Rafael Deminice*
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, CEP 14049-900Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Guilherme Vannucchi Portari
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, CEP 14049-900Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Helio Vannucchi
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, CEP 14049-900Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
Alceu Afonso Jordao
Affiliation:
Nutrition and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Avenida Bandeirantes 3900, CEP 14049-900Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author: Rafael Deminice, fax +55 16 3602 4547, email deminice@ig.com.br
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hyperhomocysteinaemia is an independent risk factor for CVD. Recent data show a relationship between homocysteine (Hcy) and free radical formation. Since creatine synthesis is responsible for most of the methyl group transfers that result in Hcy formation, creatine supplementation might inhibit Hcy production and reduce free radical formation. The present study investigated the effects of creatine supplementation on Hcy levels and lipid peroxidation biomarkers. Thirty rats were divided into three groups: control group; diet with creatine group (DCr; 2 % creatine in the diet for 28 d); creatine overload plus diet with creatine group (CrO+D; 5 g creatine/kg by oral administration for 5 d+2 % in the diet for 23 d). Plasma Hcy was significantly lower (P < 0·05) in DCr (7·5 (sd 1·2) μmol/l) and CrO+D (7·2 (sd 1·7) μmol/l) groups compared with the control group (12·4 (sd 2·2) μmol/l). Both plasma thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS) (control, 10 (sd 3·4); DCr, 4·9 (sd 0·7); CrO+D, 2·4 (sd 1) μmol/l) and plasma total glutathione (control, 4·3 (sd 1·9); DCr, 2·5 (sd 0·8); CrO+D, 1·8 (sd 0·5) μmol/l) were lower in the groups that received creatine (P < 0·05). In addition, Hcy showed significant negative correlation (P < 0·05) with plasma creatine (r − 0·61) and positive correlation with plasma TBARS (r 0·74). Plasma creatine was negatively correlated with plasma TBARS (r − 0·75) and total peroxide (r − 0·40). We conclude that creatine supplementation reduces plasma Hcy levels and lipid peroxidation biomarkers, suggesting a protective role against oxidative damage. Modulating Hcy formation may, however, influence glutathione synthesis and thereby affect the redox state of the cells.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2008
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Schematic presentation of the interaction of homocysteine and creatine metabolism in humans and animals: an increase in creatine intake inhibits the action of the enzyme l-arginine : glycine amidinotransferase (AGAT) required for reaction 1. As consequence, the pathway of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) is down-regulated and there is a decrease in homocysteine formation (reaction 2). Under normal conditions (normal creatine intake), methionine will interact with guanidinoacetate, forming homocysteine. THF, tetrahydrofolate; MS, methionine synthase; GNMT, glycine N-methyltransferase; GAMT, guanidinoacetate methyl-transferase; CβS, cystathionine-β-synthase; GSH, reduced glutathione; reaction 3, transmethylation; reaction 4, trans-sulfuration; reaction 5, remethylation.

Figure 1

Table 1 Comparison of the general and biochemical characteristics of the control, dietary creatine (DCr) and creatine overload plus diet (CrO+D) groups after 4 weeks of experimentation(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Effects of 4 weeks of creatine supplementation on plasma homocysteine (Hcy) (A) and methionine (B) levels in the control, dietary creatine (DCr) and creatine overload plus diet (CrO+D) groups. Values are means, with standard deviations represented by vertical bars. a,b Mean values with unlike letters were significantly different (P < 0·05; ANOVA followed by the Tukey post test).

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Linear regression demonstrating a significant negative relationship (r − 0·61; P < 0·01) between homocysteine (Hcy) and plasma creatine (A), a significant positive relationship (r 0·74; P < 0·01) between plasma Hcy and thiobarbituric acid-reactive species (TBARS) (B) and a significant negative relationship (r − 0·75; P < 0·01) between plasma creatine and plasma TBARS (C). The graphs present the data for all experimental groups: control (■), dietary creatine (●) and creatine overload plus diet (△).

Figure 4

Table 2 Plasma levels of the amino acids involved in the metabolism of homocysteine for the control, dietary creatine (DCr) and creatine overload plus diet (CrO+D) groups after 4 weeks of experimentation(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 5

Table 3 Biomarkers of oxidative stress and the antioxidant defence system in the plasma and liver of the control, dietary creatine (DCr) and creatine overload plus diet (CrO+D) groups after 4 weeks of experimentation(Mean values and standard deviations)