Antipsychotic medications are used widely in the treatment of psychotic disorders. Reference Efthimiou, Taipale, Radua, Schneider-Thoma, Pinzon-Espinosa and Ortuno1 Second-generation antipsychotics are generally preferred, for their efficacy and lower propensity for extrapyramidal side-effects. Reference Lally and MacCabe2 However, antipsychotics have been implicated in increasing the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Reference Salvo, Pariente, Shakir, Robinson, Arnaud and Thomas3 SCD is an unexpected death due to cardiac causes, occurring within a short period. SCD generally occurs within 1 h of symptom onset, primarily through mechanisms such as QT-interval prolongation leading to ventricular arrhythmias. Reference Straus, Bleumink, Dieleman, van der Lei, t Jong and Kingma4
Clozapine is widely considered a drug of choice for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Reference Siskind, McCartney, Goldschlager and Kisely5 Despite its unique efficacy, clozapine’s clinical utility is constrained by several life-threatening side-effects, including agranulocytosis, seizures, myocarditis and cardiomyopathy. Reference Haidary and Padhy6 Although these adverse effects are well documented, the relationship between clozapine and cardiac health remains poorly understood, specifically the risk of SCD. The specific risk factors that may be associated with clozapine use remain inadequately researched. Given the importance of clozapine in TRS management and its potentially fatal cardiac complications, there is a crucial role for systematic evaluation of SCD risk in clozapine-treated patients. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review to identify the risk factors associated with SCD in clozapine-treated patients.
Method
Searches
We searched five databases from inception to 13 October 2025: Medline (1946–2025), EMBASE (1947–2025), PsycINFO (1984–2025), Web of Science (1997–2025) and Scopus (1993–2025). A preliminary scoping search was conducted on 20 January 2025 to determine the feasibility of the systematic review. The protocol was then registered with PROSPERO (no. CRD420250646384) on 24 February 2025, and followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Comprehensive data were extracted from the five databases on a single day (13 October 2025). The search strategy combined terms for clozapine with cardiac outcomes (QT/QTc prolongation, arrhythmias, torsades de pointes, SCD, ventricular tachyarrhythmias) and serious adverse events (paralytic ileus, agranulocytosis, sepsis, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, seizures, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, renal failure, rhabdomyolysis) (Supplementary Information 1 available at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.11024). Grey literature was not searched due to concerns about data quality. Reference lists of relevant papers and related PubMed articles featured were used to identify additional studies.
All searches were exported to Endnote version 21.0.1 on a macOS platform (Clarivate, London, UK; www.endnote.com), 7 duplicates removed and the final list imported to Rayyan (Rayyan Systems Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; www.rayyan.ai) Reference Ouzzani, Hammady, Fedorowicz and Elmagarmid8 for screening. Two reviewers (T.E., H.T.) independently screened titles and abstracts, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer (D.C.). All reviewers were blinded during initial screening. Full texts were independently reviewed by two reviewers (T.E., H.T.). Interrater reliability was assessed using Cohen’s kappa coefficient.
Study selection
Inclusion and exclusion criteria were agreed prior to study selection (Supplementary Information 1). We included studies where patients were treated with clozapine (either as monotherapy or in combination with other psychotropic medications) and experienced sudden unexplained death (SUD) or SCD. There were no restrictions on patients’ age, gender, diagnosis, clozapine dose, duration, formulation or route of administration. All study types were included (case series, case reports, case–control and cohort studies) except reviews and conference abstracts. Patients had to be treated with clozapine prior to the index event and could have any psychiatric condition where clozapine was prescribed. We excluded studies reporting sudden death from non-cardiac causes and overdose deaths. Reasons for exclusion are detailed in the PRISMA flowchart (Fig. 1). Reference Page, McKenzie, Bossuyt, Boutron, Hoffmann and Mulrow9
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart.

Outcome definitions and ascertainment
SCD was defined as an unexpected death presumed to be cardiac in origin occurring within either 1 h of symptom onset or 24 h of last being seen well, as per standard epidemiological definitions. Reference Yow, Rajasurya, Ahmed and Sharma10 SUD was defined as a death with no clear cause identified, where available clinical, toxicology or post-mortem data were insufficient to attribute death to a specific pathology. Ascertainment of cause of death varied due to heterogeneity in reporting, especially in older and pharmacovigilance studies. Where autopsy findings, cardiac imaging, biomarkers or specialist cardiology assessments were available, deaths were categorised as either (a) arrhythmic SCD, (b) myocarditis-related SCD or (c) cardiomyopathy-related SCD. Deaths described using non-specific terms (such as ‘sudden death’) were conservatively classified as SUD. Studies reporting mixed or uncertain causes were included but acknowledged in the narrative synthesis, and no assumptions were made in the absence of supporting evidence.
Quality assessment
We used the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tools Checklist Reference Moola, Munn, Tufanaru, Aromataris, Sears, Sfetcu, Aromataris and Munn11 for case reports and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Exposures (ROBINS-E) tool Reference Higgins, Morgan, Rooney, Taylor, Thayer and Silva12 for cohort and case-control studies. ROBINS-E provides comprehensive assessment of bias risk across seven domains. Two reviewers (T.E., D.C.) independently rated each study. A traffic-light plot was created using R version 4.3.3 on a macOS platform (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; www.r-project.org) 13 (Fig. 2).
Quality assessment. JBI, Joanna Brigga Institute; ROBINS-E, Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Exposures. ROBINS-E Quality Assessment: D1, Bias due to confounding; D2, Bias arising from measurement of the exposure; D3, Bias in selection of participants into the study; D4, Bias due to post-exposure interventions; D5, Bias due to missing data; D6, Bias arising from measurement of the outcome; D7, Bias in selection of the reported result.

Data extraction
We extracted all identifiable risk factors associated with SCD occurrence, including age, gender, psychiatric diagnosis, clozapine dose and duration, polypharmacy and physical comorbidities. Two independent reviewers (T.E., H.T.) extracted data onto Microsoft Excel sheets using a pre-designed template. Reference Li, Higgins, Deeks, Higgins, Chandler, Cumpston, Li, Page and Welch14 Discrepancies were discussed and resolved. We extracted information on study design, sample size, demographics, psychiatric history, clozapine parameters, previous cardiac diagnoses, concomitant medications, comorbidities and statistics.
Analysis
We initially aimed to perform a quantitative meta-analysis of risk factors; however, this was not feasible due to substantial heterogeneity in study designs, statistical reporting and outcome definitions. Consequently we undertook structured narrative synthesis adapted from the Navigation Guide systematic review framework. Reference Woodruff and Sutton15,Reference Tranfield, Denyer and Smart16 Two reviewers (T.E, D.C.) independently extracted potential risk factors and clustered them into thematic domains through discussion. Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Strength of evidence for each risk factor was assessed qualitatively using a modified GRADE-informed framework, considering study design, consistency, magnitude and precision of effect estimates, biological plausibility and risk of bias, consistent with established guidance for observational evidence. Reference Balshem, Helfand, Schunemann, Oxman, Kunz and Brozek17 GRADE categories (high, moderate, low and very low) were applied to a body of evidence rather than to individual studies. Two reviewers (T.E, D.C.) independently assessed the strength of evidence for each risk factor.
Results
Search results
Following removal of duplicates, our search identified 6097 potentially relevant articles from five databases. Having screened titles and abstracts, 5944 articles were excluded: 333 were review articles, 14 were letters of notes and 5597 failed to meet inclusion criteria or lacked relevance to the research question. Common exclusion reasons included the following: no primary data reported; irrelevant study population; clozapine not mentioned; outcome did not include SCD/SUD; and non-English publications.
Following abstract screening, 17 conflicts were resolved through discussion. Subsequently, 153 articles underwent full-text assessment. One paper had a discrepancy on full-text review Reference Fineschi, Neri, Riezzo and Turillazzi18 due to not fitting SCD criteria, and was excluded. We finally included 21 studies in this review. Reference Borentain, Millet and Olie19–Reference Wang, He, Andersen, Lin, Zhang and Liu39 The PRISMA flowchart (Fig. 1) elucidates the reason for non-exclusion of studies. Interrater reliability was Cohen’s κ = 0.92 for full-text and abstract screening.
Study characteristics
The final cohort comprised 21 studies spanning the period 1989–2023, representing diverse regions including the UK, Europe, North America, Australia and Asia (Table 1). Study designs included case reports (n = 6), Reference Borentain, Millet and Olie19,Reference Chopra and de Leon21,Reference Es, Melez, Ozgun, Melez, Kertmen and Cavlak22,Reference Hoehns, Fouts, Kelly and Tu26,Reference Katta, Balla and Aggarwal28,Reference Ramaswamy, Boust, Sattar, Bhatia and Petty33 case series (n = 3), Reference Hagg, Spigset, Bate and Soderstrom24,Reference Kilian, Kerr, Lawrence and Celermajer30,Reference Ronaldson, Fitzgerald, Taylor, Topliss and McNeil35 retrospective cohort studies (n = 7), Reference Hennessy, Bilker, Knauss, Margolis, Kimmel and Reynolds25,Reference Karlsson, Wallerstedt, Star, Bate and Hagg27,Reference Leonard, Freeman, Newcomb, Bilker, Kimmel and Strom31,Reference Modai, Hirschmann, Rava, Kurs, Barak and Lichtenberg32,Reference Ray, Chung, Murray, Hall and Stein34,Reference Rose, Chen, Turrion, Jenkins, Cardinal and Fernandez-Egea36,Reference Wang, He, Andersen, Lin, Zhang and Liu39 case-crossover (n = 2), Reference Chen, Tsai, Pan, Chang, Su and Chen20,Reference Wu, Tsai and Tsai38 case–control, Reference Windfuhr, Turnbull, While, Swinson, Mehta and Hadfield37 prospective cohort studies (n = 1) Reference Khan, Ashraf, Baker, Al-Omary, Savage and Ekmejian29 and a pharmacovigilance study. Reference Grohmann, Ruther, Sassim and Schmidt23 Sample sizes ranged from single-patient case reports to large national database analyses involving over 200 000 patients exposed to clozapine (Table 1).
Included studies

SCD, sudden cardiac death; ECT, electroconvulsive therapy; BMI, body mass index; CAD, coronary artery disease; LAD, left anterior descending artery; TGA, therapeutic goods administration; aRR, adjusted relative risk; SUD, sudden unexpected death; CTP, clozapine-treated patients; IRR, incidence rate ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; VA, ventricular arrhythmia.
Quality assessment
Overall quality of the included case reports was high, but risk of bias among larger observational studies was heterogenous (Fig. 2). Evaluation with the JBI checklist showed that most case reports adequately described patient demographics, interventions and outcomes, although a minority omitted details on timelines, Reference Hoehns, Fouts, Kelly and Tu26,Reference Katta, Balla and Aggarwal28,Reference Kilian, Kerr, Lawrence and Celermajer30,Reference Ramaswamy, Boust, Sattar, Bhatia and Petty33 current clinical description Reference Katta, Balla and Aggarwal28,Reference Kilian, Kerr, Lawrence and Celermajer30,Reference Ramaswamy, Boust, Sattar, Bhatia and Petty33 and diagnostic testing. Reference Borentain, Millet and Olie19,Reference Grohmann, Ruther, Sassim and Schmidt23,Reference Hoehns, Fouts, Kelly and Tu26,Reference Ramaswamy, Boust, Sattar, Bhatia and Petty33 Using ROBINS-E to assess 13 non-randomised studies, 8 were judged to be at high risk of bias Reference Chen, Tsai, Pan, Chang, Su and Chen20,Reference Grohmann, Ruther, Sassim and Schmidt23,Reference Karlsson, Wallerstedt, Star, Bate and Hagg27,Reference Khan, Ashraf, Baker, Al-Omary, Savage and Ekmejian29,Reference Modai, Hirschmann, Rava, Kurs, Barak and Lichtenberg32,Reference Ronaldson, Fitzgerald, Taylor, Topliss and McNeil35,Reference Rose, Chen, Turrion, Jenkins, Cardinal and Fernandez-Egea36,Reference Wang, He, Andersen, Lin, Zhang and Liu39 and 5 raised some concerns. Reference Hennessy, Bilker, Knauss, Margolis, Kimmel and Reynolds25,Reference Leonard, Freeman, Newcomb, Bilker, Kimmel and Strom31,Reference Ray, Chung, Murray, Hall and Stein34,Reference Windfuhr, Turnbull, While, Swinson, Mehta and Hadfield37,Reference Wu, Tsai and Tsai38 The limitations for each risk factor domain are summarised in Supplementary Table 1. Overall, these limitations highlight the importance of cautious interpretation of causal inferences from these studies.
Patient characteristics
Across all studies, 498 patients treated with clozapine experienced SCD or SUD, with baseline characteristics identified (Table 2). Most studies involved adult patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, although some included mixed psychiatric diagnoses. Most cohorts were predominantly male: the mean proportion of males was 68% (95% CI 62.8–73.3%). Participant ages ranged from 24 to 54 years, with a mean of 36.94 years (s.d. 9.86). Myocarditis, cardiomyopathy and ventricular arrhythmia were reported as direct causes of death in a subset of cases. Several studies included comparator groups of patients receiving other second-generation antipsychotics, typical antipsychotics or no antipsychotic exposure (Table 3 ).
Characteristics of the included cohort

Risk of sudden cardiac death for clozapine compared with other antipsychotics

CTP, clozapine-treated patients.
Risk factors
Structured narrative synthesis identified four main domains of risk factors for SCD and SUD in clozapine-treated patients: treatment intensity, concomitant drug interactions, monitoring and behavioural/lifestyle factors (Table 4 and Fig. 3). Treatment intensity refers to clozapine administration and dosing. We identified high daily dose, rapid titration and cumulative exposure as risk factors. Concomitant drug interactions refer to polypharmacy and specific drug combinations. We identified polypharmacy, sodium valproate and benzodiazepines as key risk factors. Behavioural/lifestyle factors (daily habits, actions and ways of living) were also found to modulate risk of SCD in clozapine-treated patients. We identified metabolic risk factors, including obesity, diabetes mellitus and cigarette smoking. Monitoring refers to the use of clinical, laboratory or imaging tests for the early detection or tracking of myocarditis or other cardiac damage. We observed troponin I/T and creatinine kinase to be raised in a clozapine fatal myocarditis case in a series by Ronaldson et al, Reference Ronaldson, Fitzgerald, Taylor, Topliss and McNeil35 and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in a case by Katta et al. Reference Katta, Balla and Aggarwal28
Summary of risk factors. SSRIs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors; ULN, upper limit of normal; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.

Major risk factor categories identified among clozapine-treated patients with sudden cardiac death (SCD) or sudden unexplained death (SUD), and supporting evidence

Discussion
This systematic review synthesises current evidence on risk factors for SCD or SUD in clozapine-treated patients from 21 studies spanning the period 1989–2023. Our findings build on prior meta-analysis, reporting a threefold increase in SCD risk with clozapine (odds ratio 3.67, 95% CI 1.94–6.94), the highest risk among antipsychotics except thioridazine. Reference Salvo, Pariente, Shakir, Robinson, Arnaud and Thomas3 Global pharmacovigilance data from the World Health Organization corroborate these concerns, identifying SCD and SUD as the second leading cause of death in clozapine-treated patients behind pneumonia, with 1449 fatal cases recorded from inception to July 2019. Reference De Leon, Sanz and De Las Cuevas40 However, a recent VigiBase analysis highlights important limitations of pharmacovigilance data, noting that the most frequently reported fatal outcome was the non-specific category ‘death’, which may misattribute causative adverse drug reactions. Reference De Las Cuevas, Sanz and de Leon41 We identified four main risk factor domains: treatment intensity (high doses, rapid titration), drug interactions (valproate, benzodiazepines, polypharmacy), lifestyle/behavioural factors (smoking, obesity, diabetes, substance use) and monitoring considerations. This multifactorial risk profile highlights the importance of vigilant short- and long-term monitoring in patients treated with clozapine.
Treatment intensity
Studies reported higher doses and rapid titration among SUD and SCD cases, consistent with a prior systematic review linking higher doses with myocarditis and cardiomyopathy. Reference Vickers, Ramineni, Malacova, Eriksson, McMahon and Moudgil42 Whereas British National Formulary (BNF) guidelines advise slow titration in steps of 50–100 mg once or twice weekly to a maximum daily dose of 200–450 mg over 14–21 days, 43 contemporary evidence supports a more individualised approach. The Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines recommend titration tailored to gender and smoking status; slower titration in female non-smokers compared with male smokers, reflecting metabolic differences; and suggest CYP1A2 pharmacogenetic testing to identify patients requiring lower doses. Reference Taylor, Barnes and Young44 Observational data further link aggressive early dose escalation with myocarditis: an Australian case–control study reported a 26% increase in myocarditis risk for each additional 250 mg added in the first 9 days of treatment. Reference Ronaldson, Fitzgerald, Taylor, Topliss, Wolfe and McNeil45 Multiple case reports in this review described accelerated titration rates preceding SCD. Reference Borentain, Millet and Olie19,Reference Chopra and de Leon21,Reference Hagg, Spigset, Bate and Soderstrom24 Collectively, these findings suggest the need for personalised, biomarker-informed, cautious clozapine initiation. What needs to be further established is whether enhanced monitoring is required for those on higher doses.
Concomitant drug interactions
Our finding of valproate co-prescription in two case reports of SCD and myocarditis-related SCD Reference Borentain, Millet and Olie19,Reference Chopra and de Leon21 aligns with meta-analyses identifying increased risk of clozapine-related myocarditis and cardiomyopathy (pooled odds ratio 3.58, 95% CI 1.81–7.06). Reference Vickers, Ramineni, Malacova, Eriksson, McMahon and Moudgil42 One pharmacokinetic study suggested that valproate inhibits clozapine metabolism, with a mean plasma clozapine increase of 22.5%. Reference Flanagan, Obee, Kim and Every-Palmer46 A cohort study found that concomitant valproate during clozapine initiation increased inflammatory adverse events, including myocarditis (odds ratio 3.25, 95% CI 1.03–9.74). Reference Kikuchi, Komatsu, Otsuka, Ito, Yada and Tanifuji47 It is perceived that clozapine-related myocarditis occurs at least partly as a result of an inflammatory reaction, Reference Daniel, Rajaree, Rudy, Jafor, Prasad and Avanthika48 and co-factors such as valproate that raise clozapine exposure or provoke inflammation may increase this risk.
By contrast, our finding of benzodiazepine co-prescription in two case reports of SCD Reference Borentain, Millet and Olie19,Reference Ramaswamy, Boust, Sattar, Bhatia and Petty33 has sparse direct evidence in clozapine cohorts. A retrospective New York cohort of 152 patients co-prescribed clozapine and benzodiazepine reported no cardiac arrests or sudden deaths. Reference Bitter, Demler and Opler49 However, broader cardiology literature describes increased SCD incidence following benzodiazepine initiation (adjusted hazard ratio 2.01, 95% CI 1.42, 2.83), Reference Mo, Wang, Li, Li, Jin and Bai50 suggested as reflecting respiratory depression and secondary arrhythmias. Reference Bounds and Patel51,Reference Kang, Galuska and Ghassemzadeh52
Sertraline, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), was identified in a single case report of SCD, Reference Hoehns, Fouts, Kelly and Tu26 although pooled meta-analysis has not shown an increased SCD risk with SSRIs overall (odds ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.038–1.600). Reference Prasitlumkum, Cheungpasitporn, Tokavanich, Ding, Kewcharoen and Thongprayoon53 One large pharmacokinetic study reported a negative correlation between sertraline dose and clozapine concentration (rs = −0.535, P = 0.048). Reference Kuzin, Schoretsanitis, Haen, Ridders, Hiemke and Grunder54 However, some studies have shown that SSRIs can have cardiovascular side-effects including fatal arrhythmias, often through QT-interval prolongation. Reference Grace, Medina-Inojosa, Thomas, Krause, Vickers-Douglas and Palmer55–Reference Aronow and Shamliyan57
Lifestyle and behavioural factors
We identified metabolic comorbidities, including obesity and diabetes mellitus, as potential contributors to SCD and SUD. Reference Es, Melez, Ozgun, Melez, Kertmen and Cavlak22,Reference Khan, Ashraf, Baker, Al-Omary, Savage and Ekmejian29,Reference Modai, Hirschmann, Rava, Kurs, Barak and Lichtenberg32,Reference Ronaldson, Fitzgerald, Taylor, Topliss and McNeil35 Pharmacokinetic studies show that body mass index (BMI) and glycaemic abnormalities affect clozapine metabolism through greater deposition in adipose tissue and influence on hepatic enzyme activity, resulting in higher exposure in some patients. Reference Kuzin, Haen, Hiemke, Bochon, Bochon and Grunder58–Reference Reeves, Bertrand, Obee, Hunter, Howard and Flanagan60 Meta-analyses show that diabetes and obesity independently increased SCD risk (risk ratio 2.02, 95% CI 1.81–2.25 and risk ratio 1.16, 95% CI 1.05–1.28, respectively), Reference Aune, Schlesinger, Norat and Riboli61,Reference Aune, Schlesinger, Norat and Riboli62 whereas clozapine itself causes rapid weight gain and dysglycaemia, further exacerbating cardiac risk, Reference Yuen, Kim, Procyshyn, Panenka, Honer and Barr63 with obesity being associated with increased blood levels of clozapine. Reference Diaz, Josiassen and de Leon64 Accordingly, international guidance advises personalised slower titration for patients with high BMI or other clinical vulnerabilities. Reference de Leon, Schoretsanitis, Smith, Molden, Solismaa and Seppala65
We identified cigarette smoking as a contributor to SCD in one cohort, Reference Khan, Ashraf, Baker, Al-Omary, Savage and Ekmejian29 appearing to amplify cardiovascular risk. One meta-analysis found that current smokers have a threefold increased risk of SCD than never-smokers (risk ratio 3.06, 95% CI 2.46–3.82). Reference Aune, Schlesinger, Norat and Riboli66 Mechanistically, tobacco smoke induces the liver enzyme CYP1A2, Reference Hukkanen, Jacob, Peng, Dempsey and Benowitz67 producing significantly lower clozapine plasma concentration levels (standard mean difference −0.39, 95% CI −0.55 to −0.22, P < 0.001). Reference Wagner, McMahon, Falkai, Hasan and Siskind68 Similarly, a retrospective cohort study reported clinically important rises in clozapine levels following abrupt smoking cessation. Reference Cormac, Brown, Creasey, Ferriter and Huckstep69 This could be explained by CYP1A2 activity declining following smoking cessation. Reference Faber and Fuhr70 However, this review could not find any association of smoking cessation with SCD or SUD. Closer therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustments following smoking cessation warrant further investigation.
We also identified an increased prevalence of illicit drug use (including cannabis, opioids and stimulants) with SCD in one cohort, Reference Khan, Ashraf, Baker, Al-Omary, Savage and Ekmejian29 although the study had insufficient power for statistical analysis. A recent meta-analysis showed that cannabis was associated with increased cardiovascular (risk ratio 2.10, 95% CI 1.29–3.42), Reference Storck, Elbaz, Vindis, Deguilhem, Lapeyre-Mestre and Jouanjus71 chronic opioid exposure with increased CVD risk (pooled odds ratio 1.74, 95% CI 1.12–2.70) Reference Schofield, Conti, Khan and Baldacchino72 and amphetamines with higher cardiovascular mortality (odds ratio 5.12, 95% CI 3.74–7.00). Reference Stockings, Tran, Santo, Peacock, Larney and Santomauro73 Stimulants produce catecholamine surges, coronary vasospasms and direct myocardial toxicity that may precipitate ventricular arrhythmia and promote chronic dilated cardiomyopathy. Reference Dominic, Ahmad, Awwab, Bhuiyan, Kevil and Goeders74,Reference Reddy, Ng, Oh, Moady and Elkayam75
Monitoring
Two temporal patterns of clozapine-associated SCD were identified: an early-onset inflammatory myocarditis and later-onset cardiomyopathy, consistent with a previous review. Reference Gupta, Sayeed, Singh and Goswami76 In a fatal myocarditis-related SCD case series, Ronaldson et al Reference Ronaldson, Fitzgerald, Taylor, Topliss and McNeil35 reported elevated troponin I (TnI) and T (TnT) in two affected patients. Cardiac troponins are cardiomyocyte-specific regulatory proteins released following myocardial injury, extensively validated as biomarkers for myocardial infarction. Reference Katrukha and Katrukha77,Reference Stark and Sharma78 An Australian case control study reported that 90% of patients with clozapine myocarditis had TnI or TnT concentrations that exceeded twice the upper limit of normal (ULN). Reference Ronaldson, Fitzgerald, Taylor, Topliss and McNeil79 ULN represents the assay-specific maximum threshold, typically defined as the 99th percentile of a healthy reference population. Reported ULNs for TnI and TnT in this study ranged from 0.03 to 0.60 μg/L. Reference Ronaldson, Fitzgerald, Taylor, Topliss and McNeil79 Similarly, data from a London (UK) electronic health registry showed strong predictive performance of troponin-based models in the detection of clozapine-associated myocarditis, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.975 in logistic regression analysis. Reference Segev, Iqbal, McDonagh, Casetta, Oloyede and Piper80 Given that AUC values range from 0.5 (no discriminative ability) to 1.0 (perfect discrimination), an AUC of 0.975 reflects excellent accuracy in distinguishing patients with clozapine-induced myocarditis. In broader cardiology cohorts, a large Scottish study found that TnI was more strongly associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD mortality, whereas TnT was associated more with non-CVD-related deaths. Reference Welsh, Preiss, Hayward, Shah, McAllister and Briggs81 These findings suggest that TnI may offer better specificity for clozapine-related myocarditis and SCD; however, this requires further validation in dedicated psychiatric cohorts.
Creatinine kinase elevation was also seen with myocarditis-related SCD in the study of Ronaldson et al. Reference Ronaldson, Fitzgerald, Taylor, Topliss and McNeil35 Creatinine kinase is involved in cellular energy metabolism, with its myocardial isoenzyme CK-MB historically used in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction before being replaced by troponins. Reference Aujla, Zubair and Patel82 A post-mortem meta-analysis showed significantly higher CK-MB in SCD patients (standard mean difference 0.63, 95% CI 0.09–1.17, P = 0.02). Reference Xu, Zhang, Zhu and Cao83 A prospective study in Georgia (USA) involving 100 patients (4 developed myocarditis) reported creatinine kinase abnormalities in 30% of first-exposure and 46% of re-initiated patients – considerably higher than troponin I (3.5 and 0%, respectively) or C-reactive protein (CRP) (23 and 39%, respectively), Reference Sandarsh, Bishnoi, Shashank, Miller, Freudenreich and McEvoy84 suggesting that creatinine kinase elevation is common but poorly specific for myocarditis. Rises can occur secondary to non-cardiac factors such as rhabdomyolysis, strenuous exercise or trauma. Reference Kurapati and Zubair85
CRP, also identified with myocarditis-related SCD, Reference Ronaldson, Fitzgerald, Taylor, Topliss and McNeil35 is an acute-phase inflammatory marker. Reference Singh, Goyal and Patel86 One meta-analysis showed that higher CRP concentrations carried a greater risk of sudden death (hazard ratio 1.19, 95% CI 1.09–1.29). Reference Zhou, Xu, Luan, Wang, Tang and Huang87 Although we did not observe a direct association between CRP and clozapine SCD, a retrospective cohort reported excellent discrimination (AUC 0.876) for clozapine-related myocarditis. Reference Segev, Iqbal, McDonagh, Casetta, Oloyede and Piper80 However, CRP elevation lacks specificity for clozapine-related myocarditis and may be raised in concurrent infection, inflammation, comorbidities and other factors. Reference Gupta, Sayeed, Singh and Goswami76 Despite these limitations, in a proposed monitoring protocol, baseline measurements of troponin, CRP and echocardiography are recommended, with clozapine cessation if troponin exceeds twofold ULN or CRP >100 mg/L. Reference Ronaldson, Fitzgerald, Taylor, Topliss and McNeil79 Similarly, the Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines recommend weekly monitoring of CRP, creatinine kinase and troponin during the first 4 weeks of treatment, or if body temperature exceeds 38°C, with elevated CRP and troponin prompting further assessment using creatinine kinase, B-type natriuretic peptide and echocardiography to confirm or exclude myocarditis. Reference Taylor, Barnes and Young44
NT-proBNP was raised in one case report of myocarditis-related SCD. Reference Katta, Balla and Aggarwal28 NT-proBNP is released from cardiomyocytes in response to myocardial wall stress, and is validated for heart failure diagnosis. Reference Weber and Hamm88 A cross-sectional study of 38 patients receiving chronic clozapine treatment identified subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in a minority, with NT-proBNP showing strong discriminatory performance (AUC = 0.87). Reference Rostagno, Domenichetti, Pastorelli and Gensini89 Collectively, these data support troponin, CRP and NT-proBNP as useful adjunctive tests, but large prospective validating specific thresholds and efficacy are lacking for clozapine SCD and other cardiovascular side-effects.
Distinct mechanistic pathways of SCD
Evidence from the included studies suggests at least two partially distinct pathways of SCD in clozapine-treated patients, with implications for monitoring and prevention. An inflammatory-structural pathway involves early-onset myocarditis, sometimes progressing to dilated cardiomyopathy, typically within weeks to months of treatment, with highest risk during early exposure, rapid titration and concomitant sodium valproate use. Reference Chopra and de Leon21,Reference Hagg, Spigset, Bate and Soderstrom24,Reference Katta, Balla and Aggarwal28,Reference Kilian, Kerr, Lawrence and Celermajer30,Reference Ronaldson, Fitzgerald, Taylor, Topliss and McNeil35,Reference Vickers, Ramineni, Malacova, Eriksson, McMahon and Moudgil42 By contrast, an electrophysiological pathway may involve QT prolongation, autonomic instability or ventricular arrhythmias leading to SCD without preceding structural disease. Reference Salvo, Pariente, Shakir, Robinson, Arnaud and Thomas3,Reference Hennessy, Bilker, Knauss, Margolis, Kimmel and Reynolds25,Reference Wu, Tsai and Tsai38 These differing mechanisms may suggest the need for different preventive strategies.
Clinical implications
Currently in the UK, the National Institute for Clinical Excellence and BNF advise baseline cardiac assessment before starting clozapine; specialist review if abnormalities are present; discontinuation if myocarditis or cardiomyopathy is suspected; and ongoing cardiovascular risk monitoring, including electrocardiogram review, in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. 43,90 However, a previous systemic review highlighted the limited high-quality evidence for intensive routine cardiac monitoring, alongside concerns regarding cost-effectiveness, service capacity and barriers to clozapine access. Reference Knoph, Morgan, Palmer, Schak, Owen and Leloux91 In this context, our findings highlight the rationale for considering refinement rather than escalation of monitoring, favouring a risk-stratified and mechanism-informed approach. Specifically, our findings support consideration of more cautious clozapine titration, avoiding rapid dose titration in early treatment and particular care in patients receiving polypharmacy. Monitoring of clozapine plasma levels in individuals at elevated risk may provide contextual pharmacokinetic information; however, supporting evidence is largely limited to clozapine-associated myocarditis, Reference Bellissima, Burns, Helsby, Kingston, Garavan and Tingle92 but evidence linking plasma levels with SCD or SUD remains limited. Early measurement of inflammatory and cardiac biomarkers (CRP and high-sensitivity troponin) in the first few weeks of initiation has been proposed for clozapine-associated myocarditis; however, evidence that such strategies reduce SCD or SUD is lacking, and larger-scale trials are required. Routine cardiovascular risk management, including smoking cessation support, substance misuse management, careful dose adjustment and regular review of high-risk co-medications (particularly valproate and multiple antipsychotics), is important for safe clozapine prescribing but has limited direct evidence for SCD or SUD reduction. Emerging digital and wearable technologies may have a future role in longer-term risk monitoring, although evidence remains preliminary. Reference Krishnadas, Saunders, Donnelly, Okubadejo, Ayadurai and Meiser-Stedman93 Importantly, these risks must be balanced against clozapine’s substantial survival benefits: an important meta-analysis showed a significant reduction in all-cause mortality despite cardiometabolic concerns (risk ratio 0.43, 95% CI 0.34–0.55), and clozapine was the largest protective factor for suicide-related mortality in schizophrenia (risk ratio 0.21, 95% CI 0.15–0.29). Reference Correll, Solmi, Croatto, Schneider, Rohani-Montez and Fairley94 As the only antipsychotic with proven efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, clozapine is often under-utilised due to safety concerns. Recognition of cardiac risk factors should inform proportionate cardiovascular assessment and tailored monitoring strategies, thereby supporting safe prescribing and improved access, rather than discouraging its use.
Clozapine-associated SCD and SUD appear multifactorial, involving treatment factors, patient comorbidities and pharmacological and lifestyle factors. Future studies should clarify the longer-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these added monitoring strategies needed to address sudden deaths in this vulnerable population.
Strengths and limitations
Strengths include comprehensive database searches, inclusion of broad study designs – from case report to large cohort analyses – and structured synthesis organising risk factors into clinically actionable themes. However, the evidence base is limited by the predominance of case reports and small observational studies, inconsistent definitions of SCD, SUD and myocarditis with variable autopsy rates, heterogenous reporting and an overall high risk of bias, which collectively prevent meta-analysis for most risk factors. Ethnicity was reported in some case reports but was absent from all included cohort studies, limiting assessment of ancestry-related differences in clozapine pharmacokinetics. Evidence suggests that individuals of Asian or Indigenous American ancestry have slower metabolism and increased risk of toxicity, Reference de Leon, Schoretsanitis, Smith, Molden, Solismaa and Seppala65 although this review was unable to evaluate these factors. In addition, the exclusion of grey literature and non-English studies may have led to an under-ascertainment of rare but clinically important adverse effects. Consequently, our findings emphasise pattern recognition and hypothesis generation rather than definitive causal inferences. These limitations highlight the need for well-designed prospective studies and improved pharmacovigilance systems to better characterise clozapine-associated SCD.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.11024
Data availability
Data availability is not applicable to this article because no new data were created or analysed in this study. The search strategy is available in Supplementary Information 1.
Author contributions
T.E.: conception, search, literature review, data collection, analysis, writing, drafting and revisions. D.C., S.A. and H.T.: literature review, analysis, drafting and revisions. E.B.M.L.: support, advice, supervision, scientific advice, analysis, drafting and revision. H.E.S.: conception, advice on methodology and design, study supervision, assistance with analysis, scientific and technical advice and supervisory support.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Declaration of interest
None.




eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.