Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-vdhp9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T09:11:05.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The burden of cardiovascular disease and cancer attributable to low fruit and vegetable intake in the European Union: differences between old and new Member States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Joceline Pomerleau ,
Karen Lock  and
Martin McKee
Joceline Pomerleau*
Affiliation:
European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WCIE 7HT, UK
Karen Lock
Affiliation:
European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WCIE 7HT, UK
Martin McKee
Affiliation:
European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WCIE 7HT, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Email Joceline.Pomerleau@lshtm.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Objective

To estimate the burden of disease attributable to low fruit and vegetable intake in the 15 countries that were members of the European Union (EU) before May 2004 (EU-15) and the 10 countries that then joined it (EU-10).

Design

Data on fruit and vegetable intake, target levels of intake and estimates of relative risks, deaths and disability were combined to obtain the burden of ischaemic heart disease, ischaemic stroke and four types of cancer (lung/bronchus/trachea, stomach, oesophagus, and colon/rectum) attributable to low fruit and vegetable consumption.

Setting

EU-15 and EU-10 Member States.

Results

The number of lives potentially saved annually from the selected outcomes if fruit and vegetable intake increased to 600 g person−1 day−1 reached 892 000 and 423 000 in the EU-15 and EU-10, respectively; total disease burden could decrease by 1.9% and 3.6%, respectively. The burden of ischaemic heart disease and stroke could be reduced by up to 17% and 10%, respectively, in the EU-15 and by 24% and 15%, respectively, in the EU-10; potential reductions for the selected cancers varied from 1% to 12% in the EU-15 and from 2% to 17% in the EU-10.

Conclusions

The potential health gain of increased fruit and vegetable intake is particularly large in the new Member States, and particularly high for cardiovascular diseases, a main cause of health divide in Europe. This stresses the need for better nutrition programmes and policies that take account of economic, social and cultural specificities.

Keywords

European UnionFruitVegetablesCost of illnessCardiovascular diseasesNeoplasms

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 9 , Issue 5 , August 2006 , pp. 575 - 583
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006

References

1 World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a Joint Food and Agriculture Organization/WHO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series No. 916. Geneva: WHO, 2003.Google Scholar
2Williams, C, McColl, K, Cowburn, G. Food, Nutrition and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in the European Region: Challenges for the New Millennium. Brussels: European Heart Network, 2002.Google Scholar
3Petersen, S, Rayner, M, Leal, J, Luengo-Fernandez, R, Gray, A. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics. 2005 ed. Oxford: British Heart Foundation, 2005.Google Scholar
4Ness, AR, Powles, JW. Fruit and vegetables, and cardiovascular disease: a review. International Journal of Epidemiology 1997; 26: 1–13Google Scholar
5Law, M, Morris, J. By how much does fruit and vegetable consumption reduce the risk of ischaemic heart disease?. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 1998; 52: 549–56.Google Scholar
6 World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)/American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR). Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: AICR, 1997.Google Scholar
7 International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Handbooks of Cancer Prevention. Vol. 8. Fruit and Vegetables. Lyon: IARC Press, 2003.Google Scholar
8Ribioli, E, Norat, T. Epidemiologic evidence of the protective effect of fruit and vegetables on cancer risk. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003; 78(Suppl.): 559S–69SGoogle Scholar
9Klerk, M, Jansen, M, van't Veer, P, Kok, F. Fruits and Vegetables: Chronic Disease Prevention. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University, 1998.Google Scholar
10Bazzano, LA. Dietary Intake of Fruits and Vegetables and Risk of Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiovascular Diseases. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005.Google Scholar
11Tobias, M. The Burden of Disease and Injury in New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2001.Google Scholar
12Mathers, C, Vos, T, Stevenson, C. The Burden of Disease and Injury in Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1999.Google Scholar
13 National Institute of Public Health. Determinants of the Burden of Disease in the EU. Stockholm: National Institute of Public Health, 1997.Google Scholar
14Joffe, M, Robertson, A. The potential contribution of increased vegetable and fruit consumption to health gain in the European Union. Public Health Nutrition 2001; 4: 893–901.Google Scholar
15 World Health Organization (WHO). The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. Geneva: WHO, 2002.Google Scholar
16Lock, K, Pomerleau, J, McKee, M, Altmann, DR. The global burden of disease due to low fruit and vegetable consumption: implications for the global strategy on diet. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2005; 83: 100–8.Google Scholar
17 European Community and World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe. Health Status Overview for Countries of Central and Eastern Europe that are Candidates for Accession to the European Union. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2002.Google Scholar
18McKee, M. The implications for health of European Union enlargement. British Medical Journal 2004; 328: 1025–6.Google Scholar
19 World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe. European Health for All Database. January 2005 update. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2005.Google Scholar
20Lock, K, Pomerleau, J, Causer, L, McKee, M. Low fruit and vegetable consumption. In: Ezzati, M, Lopez, AD, Rodgers, A, Murray, CJL, eds. Comparative Quantification of Health Risks. Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors. Vol. 1. Geneva: WHO, 2004; 597–728.Google Scholar
21Pomerleau, J, Lock, K, McKee, M, Altmann, DR. The challenge of measuring global fruit and vegetable intake. Journal of Nutrition 2004; 134: 1175–80.Google Scholar
22Kelly, A, Becker, W, Helsing, E. Food balance sheets. In: Becker, W, Helsing, E, eds. Food and Health Data. Their Use in Nutrition Policy-making. World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Publications, European Series, No. 34. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 1991; 39–48.Google Scholar
23 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAOstat Statistical Database. Rome: FAO, 2005. Also available at http://faostat.fao.org/. Accessed 8 November 2005.Google Scholar
24 United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects: The 2002 Revision. New York: United Nations, 2003.Google Scholar
25Murray, C, Lopez, AD. On the comparable quantification of health risks: lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Epidemiology 1999; 10: 594–605.Google Scholar
26Ezzati, M, Lopez, AD, Rodgers, A, Murray, CJL, eds. Comparative Quantification of Health Risks: The Global and Regional Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risk Factors. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.Google Scholar
27Bobak, M, Marmot, M. East–West mortality divide and its potential explanations: proposed research agenda. British Medical Journal 1996; 312: 421–5.Google Scholar
28Pomerleau, J, McKee, M, Kadziauskiene, K, Abaravicius, A, Vaask, S, Pudule, I. Macronutrient and food intake in the Baltic Republics. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2001; 55: 200–7.Google Scholar
29Robertson, A, Tirado, C, Lobstein, T, Jermini, M, Knai, C, Jensen, JH, Food and Health in Europe: A New Basis for Action. World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Publications, European Series, No. 96 Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2004.Google Scholar
30Trichopoulou, A. Nutrition in Europe: Nutrition Policy and Public Health in the European Community and Models for European Eating Habits on the Threshold of the 21st Century. Brussels: European Parliament Scientific and Technological Options Assessment, 1997.Google Scholar
31Lobstein, T. Suppose we all ate a healthy diet. Eurohealth 2004; 10: 8–12.Google Scholar
32Ezzati, M, Vander Hoorn, S, Rodgers, A, Lopez, AD, Mathers, CD, Murray, CJL. Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group. Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors. Lancet 2003; 362: 271–80.Google Scholar
33Vartiainen, E, Jousilahti, P, Alfthan, G, Sundvall, J, Pietinen, P, Puska, P. Cardiovascular risk factor changes in Finland, 1972–1997. International Journal of Epidemiology 2000; 29: 49–56.Google Scholar
34Pomerleau, J, McKee, M, Lobstein, T, Knai, C. The burden of disease attributable to nutrition in Europe. Public Health Nutrition 2003; 6: 453–61.Google Scholar
35 Directorate-General for Health and Consumer Protection of the European Commission. Status Report on the European Commission's Work in the Field of Nutrition in Europe. Brussels: European Communities, 2002.Google Scholar
36 Eurodiet. Nutrition & Diet for Healthy Lifestyles in Europe: Science & Policy Implications. [online], 2000. Available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph/programmes/health/reports/report01_en.pdf. Accessed 8 November 2005.Google Scholar
37 Commission of the European Communities. White Paper on Food Safety. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, 2000.Google Scholar
38 Food Law/European Food Safety Authority–European Food Safety Authority adopted–council agrees key legislation putting a new European-wide food safety system in place. Commission Press Release (IP/02/100), 21 01 2002. Available at http://www.foodlaw.rdg.ac.uk/news/en-02003.htm. Accessed 19 May 2006.Google Scholar
39 European Communities Council. Council resolution of 14 December 2000 on health and nutrition. Official Journal of the European Communities C 20, 23.1.2001, 2001.Google Scholar
40 European Communities Council. Decision No. 1786/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 adopting a programme of Community action in the field of public health (2003–2008). Official Journal of the European Communities L271 09.10.2002, 2002. Also available at http://europa.eu.int/eurlex/pri/en/oj/dat/2002/l-271/l-27120021009en00010011.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2006Google Scholar
41 National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). Baseline actions 2004/2005 (Second Update/29 March 2006 1200). EU Platform on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. Bilthoven: RIVM, 2006. Also available at http://ec.europa.eu/comm/health/ph_determinants/life_style/platform/docs/synopsis_baselines.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2006.Google Scholar
42 World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe. The First Action Plan for Food and Nutrition Policy. WHO European Region 2000–2005. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2001.Google Scholar
43 World Health Organization (WHO). Fruit and Vegetable Promotion Initiative. A Meeting ReportGeneva25–27 August 2003. Geneva: WHO, 2003.Google Scholar
44Pomerleau, J, Lock, K, Knai, C, McKee, M. Effectiveness of Interventions and Programmes Promoting Fruit and Vegetable Intake. Background paper for the Joint Food and Agriculture Organization/WHO Workshop on Fruit and Vegetables for HealthKobe, Japan1–3 September 2004. Geneva: WHO, 2005.Google Scholar
45 World Health Organization (WHO) and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Fruit and Vegetables for Health. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO WorkshopKobe, Japan1–3 September 2004. Geneva: WHO, 2005.Google Scholar
46Lock, K, Pomerleau, J. Fruit and Vegetable Policy in the European Union: Its Effect on the Burden of Disease. Brussels: European Heart Network, 2005.Google Scholar
47Dowler, E. Inequalities in diet and physical activity in Europe. Public Health Nutrition 2001; 4: 701–9.Google Scholar
48 European Commission. The Health Status of the European Union. Narrowing the Health Gap. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2003.Google Scholar
49Agudo, A. Measuring Intake of Fruit and Vegetables. Background paper for the Joint Food and Agriculture Organization/WHO Workshop on Fruit and Vegetables for HealthKobe, Japan1–3 September 2004. Geneva: WHO, 2005.Google Scholar
50Roos, G, Prättälä, R. Disparities in Food Habits. Review of Research in 15 European Countries. Helsinki: National Public Health Institute, 1999.Google Scholar
51Ginter, E. High cardiovascular mortality in postcommunist countries: participation of oxidative stress?. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research 1996; 66: 183–9.Google Scholar
52Zatonski, WA, McMichael, AJ, Powles, JW. Ecological study of reasons for sharp decline in mortality from ischaemic heart disease in Poland since 1991. British Medical Journal 1998; 316: 1047–51.Google Scholar
53Rokx, C, Galloway, R, Brown, L. Prospects for Improving the Nutrition Situation in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. New York: World Bank, 2000.Google Scholar
54Pomerleau, J, McKee, M, Robertson, A, Vaask, S, Pudule, I, Grinberga, D, Food security in the Baltic Republics. Public Health Nutrition 2002; 5: 397–404.Google Scholar