Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T12:04:39.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Instantiating the multiple levels of analysis perspective in a program of study on externalizing behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2012

Theodore P. Beauchaine*
Affiliation:
Washington State University
Lisa M. Gatzke-Kopp
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Theodore P. Beauchaine, Department of Psychology, Washington State University, PO Box 644820, Pullman, WA 99164; E-mail: ted.beauchaine@wsu.edu.

Abstract

During the last quarter century, developmental psychopathology has become increasingly inclusive and now spans disciplines ranging from psychiatric genetics to primary prevention. As a result, developmental psychopathologists have extended traditional diathesis–stress and transactional models to include causal processes at and across all relevant levels of analysis. Such research is embodied in what is known as the multiple levels of analysis perspective. We describe how multiple levels of analysis research has informed our current thinking about antisocial and borderline personality development among trait impulsive and therefore vulnerable individuals. Our approach extends the multiple levels of analysis perspective beyond simple Biology × Environment interactions by evaluating impulsivity across physiological systems (genetic, autonomic, hormonal, neural), psychological constructs (social, affective, motivational), developmental epochs (preschool, middle childhood, adolescence, adulthood), sexes (male, female), and methods of inquiry (self-report, informant report, treatment outcome, cardiovascular, electrophysiological, neuroimaging). By conducting our research using any and all available methods across these levels of analysis, we have arrived at a developmental model of trait impulsivity that we believe confers a greater understanding of this highly heritable trait and captures at least some heterogeneity in key behavioral outcomes, including delinquency and suicide.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable