Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-46n74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T03:40:53.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does vitamin D during pregnancy impact offspring growth andbone?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2011

Bonny L. Specker*
Affiliation:
EA Martin Program in Human Nutrition, SWC, Box 506, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD 57007, USA
*
Correspondingauthor: Professor Bonny Specker, fax +1605 688 4220, email bonny.specker@sdstate.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During pregnancy, maternal and fetal Ca demands are met through increasedintestinal Ca absorption. Increased Ca absorption may be more dependent onoestrogen's up-regulation of Ca transport genes than on vitamin Dstatus. Numerous studies, however, have found that severe vitamin D deficiencywith secondary hyperparathyroidism during pregnancy leads to abnormal Cahomoeostasis in the neonate. Some, but not all, studies of maternal vitamin Dsupplementation during pregnancy find a greater birth weight among infants ofmothers with adequate vitamin D status. Observational studies find a higherincidence of small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants amongmothers who are vitamin D deficient, but this effect may be modified bygenetics. In addition, the effect of vitamin D status on SGA may not be linear,with increased occurrence of SGA at high maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D(25-OHD) concentrations. Some studies, but not all, alsohave found that maternal vitamin D status is associated with growth trajectoryduring the first year of life, although the findings are contradictory. Thereare recent studies that suggest maternal 25-OHD, or surrogates of vitamin Dstatus, are associated with growth and bone mass later in childhood. Theseresults are not consistent, and blinded randomised trials of vitamin Dsupplementation during pregnancy with long-term follow-up are needed todetermine the benefits, and possible risks, of maternal vitamin D status onoffspring growth and bone development. The possibility of adverse outcomes withhigher maternal 25-OHD concentrations should be considered and investigated inall ongoing and future studies.

Information

Type
70th Anniversary Conference on ‘Vitamins in early development and healthy aging: impact on infectious and chronic disease’
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Serum Ca concentrations in neonates of mothers with and without vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy. Lines connect means from the same supplementation trial. Populations were at high risk of vitamin D deficiency and supplemented groups received 25 μg (1000 IU) vitamin D/d during the third trimester unless noted otherwise. Dashed line is an observational study that provided 12·5–37·5 μg (500–1500 IU)/d among mothers in the vitamin D group. The dotted line is a trial that provided 10 μg (400 IU) vitamin D/d during the second and third trimesters. Data from references(1217).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Unadjusted association between the probability of small-for-gestational age (SGA) births and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) concentrations among white women (A; n 273) and white women with a 25-OHD ⩽100 nmol/l (B; n 217) at <22 week. The point estimates were derived from logistic regression models with serum 25-OHD concentrations specified as a quadratic spline with knot at 70 nmol/l (P=0·006; A) or quadratic term (P<0·0001; B). The solid line represents the point estimate and the dotted lines represent the 95% confidence bands. Taken from(21).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. The Netherlands Amsterdam Born Children and their Development cohort (n 2715) reported accelerated linear growth during the first year of life in infants whose mothers were deficient in vitamin D early in pregnancy. Differences in height and weight persisted even after controlling for potential covariates (gestational age, season, infant sex, maternal height, parity, maternal age, smoking, pre-pregnancy BMI, educational level, and duration of exclusive breastfeeding. Data from(20).

Figure 3

Table 1. Summary of studies investigating effect of maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy on growth and bone later in life

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Mean femur length, geometric mean distal femoral metaphyseal cross-sectional area (CSA), and geometric mean femoral splaying index according to maternal 25-OHD concentrations in 424 mother–offspring pairs at 34 weeks’ gestation. Error bars indicate 95% CI. Taken from(32).