Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-45ctf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T21:38:58.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Increases in the Communicative Behaviours of Students with Cerebral Palsy as a Result of Feedback to, and the Selection of Goals by, Paraprofessionals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2014

Laura J. Hall  and
Michelle L. Macvean
Laura J. Hall*
Affiliation:
Deakin University
Michelle L. Macvean
Affiliation:
Deakin University
*
School of Studies in Disability, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood VIC 3125, Australia
Get access

Extract

The employment of untrained paraprofessionals to support children with disabilities in educational settings is not uncommon. Although urgently needed, research on effective methods of increasing the skills of these paraprofessionals is scarce. This study, which was conducted over 3 academic years, assessed the effectiveness of incorporating naturalistic prompting strategies by paraprofessionals for increasing target communicative behaviours of students with severe spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. A concurrent multiple-baseline design replicated across 3 paraprofessionals was used to determine the effectiveness of verbal and written feedback regarding their attainment of self-selected goals for prompting target communicative behaviours. The results indicate that, after the introduction of the intervention, the prompting behaviours of all paraprofessionals increased, as did the target behaviours of all students. Increases maintained 5 months after intervention for all students observed and for 2 of the 3 paraprofessionals observed. The implications of designing a program to include specific performance feedback and active involvement by staff are discussed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Behaviour Change , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 174 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Babcock, R.A., Sulzer-Azaroff, B., Sanderson, M., & Scibak, J. (1992). Increasing nurses' use of feedback to promote infection-control practices in a head-injury treatment centre. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(3), 621–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, M.K., Fisher, M.C., Fry, J.M., Hall, I.M., Haskell, S.H., Kirner, J.E., Phillips, J.P., Reidy, R.J., Tudor, J.S., Ward, S.D., Watson, G.G., White, C.J., & Yewers, J.G. (1984). Integration in Victorian education: Report of the ministerial review of education services for the disabled. Victoria: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Fantuzzo, J., & Atkins, M. (1992). Applied behaviour analysis for educators: Teacher centered and classroom based. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 37–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleming, R., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1992). Reciprocal peer management: Improving staff instruction in a vocational training program. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 611–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, L.J., McClannahan, L.E., & Krantz, P.J. (1995). Promoting independence in integrated classrooms by teaching aides to use activity schedules and decreased prompts. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 30, 208–217.Google Scholar
Halle, J.W., Baer, D.M., & Spradlin, J.E. (1981). Teachers' generalized use of delay as a stimulus control procedure to increase language use in handicapped children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 389–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hari, M., & Akos, K. (1988). Conductive education. Great Britain: T.J. Press.Google Scholar
Hart, B., & Risley, T. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haskell, S.H., & Barrett, E.K. (1993). The education of children with physical and neurological disabilities. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Hayes, S.C. (1992). Single-case experimental designs and empirical clinical practice. In Kazdin, A.E. (Ed.), Methodological issues and strategies in clinical research (pp. 491–521). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingham, P., & Greer, R.D. (1992). Changes in student and teacher responses in observed and generalized settings as a function of supervisor observations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leach, D.J., & Ingram, K.L. (1989). The effects of information and feedback on teachers' classroom behaviour and students' academic engaged time. Educational Psychology, 9(3), 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinoehl, R.B., & Halle, J.W. (1994). Increasing the assessment probe performance of teacher aides through written prompts. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers-Warren, A., & Warren, S. (1980). Mands for verbalization: Facilitating the display of newly trained language in children. Behaviour Modification, 4, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, I.S., Anderson, S.R., & Halle, J.W. (1989). Training teachers to use naturalistic time delay: Effects on teacher behaviour and on the language of students. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14(1), 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigafoos, J., Roberts, D., Couzens, D., & Caycho, L. (1992). Improving instruction for adults with developmental disabilities: Evaluation of a staff training package. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 7(4), 283–297.Google Scholar
Sigafoos, J., Roberts, D., Kerr, M., Couzens, D., & Baglioni, A.J. (1994). Opportunities for communication in classrooms serving children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(3), 259–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanton, M. (1992). Cerebral palsy: A practical guide. London: Positive Health Guides.Google Scholar
Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, R. (1991). Behavior analysis for lasting change. Sydney: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Vartuli, S., & Fyfe, B. (1993). Teachers need developmentally appropriate practices too. Young Children, 48(4), 36–42.Google Scholar
Wolery, M., Ault, M.J., & Doyle, P.M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. New York: Longman.Google Scholar