Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-13T12:42:03.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative study of parasites in three latrines from Medieval and Renaissance Brussels, Belgium (14th–17th centuries)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2020

Anna Graff
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, The Henry Wellcome Building, Fitzwilliam Street, Cambridge CB2 1QH, UK
Emma Bennion-Pedley
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, The Henry Wellcome Building, Fitzwilliam Street, Cambridge CB2 1QH, UK
Ariadin K. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, The Henry Wellcome Building, Fitzwilliam Street, Cambridge CB2 1QH, UK
Marissa L. Ledger
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, The Henry Wellcome Building, Fitzwilliam Street, Cambridge CB2 1QH, UK
Koen Deforce
Affiliation:
Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
Ann Degraeve
Affiliation:
Brussel Stedenbouw en Erfgoed, Kunstberg 10-13, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
Sylvie Byl
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherches en Archéologie et Patrimoine, Université libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F.D. Roosevelt 50, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
Piers D. Mitchell*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, The Henry Wellcome Building, Fitzwilliam Street, Cambridge CB2 1QH, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Piers D. Mitchell, E-mail: pdm39@cam.ac.uk

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the species of parasite that infected the population of Brussels during the Medieval and Renaissance periods, and determine if there was notable variation between different households within the city. We compared multiple sediment layers from cesspits beneath three different latrines dating from the 14th–17th centuries. Helminths and protozoa were detected using microscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We identified Ascaris sp., Capillaria sp., Dicrocoelium dendriticum, Entamoeba histolytica, Fasciola hepatica, Giardia duodenalis, Taenia sp. and Trichuris sp. in Medieval samples, and continuing presence of Ascaris sp., D. dendriticum, F. hepatica, G. duodenalis and Trichuris sp. into the Renaissance. While some variation existed between households, there was a broadly consistent pattern with the domination of species spread by fecal contamination of food and drink (whipworm, roundworm and protozoa that cause dysentery). These data allow us to explore diet and hygiene, together with routes for the spread of fecal–oral parasites. Key factors explaining our findings are manuring practices with human excrement in market gardens, and flooding of the polluted River Senne during the 14th–17th centuries.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of Brussels showing the two excavation sites in red where the analysed latrines were found, marked by red dots in the inset. The larger site to the east is where excavation BR166-03 was conducted, in which Cesspit 1 was excavated. The site to the west represents excavation site BR-111, giving rise to Cesspits 2 and 3.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (A) unfertilized Ascaris sp. egg from Cesspit 1 (dimensions 81 μm × 41 μm). (B) Fertilized Ascaris sp. egg from Cesspit 1 (dimensions 64 μm × 45 μm). (C) Fasciola hepatica egg with intact operculum, originating from Cesspit 3 (dimensions 141 μm × 71μm). (D) Taenia sp. egg from Cesspit 1 with dimensions 36 μm × 34 μm. (E) Taenia sp. egg with visible hooks in the oncosphere (dimensions: 38 μm × 34 μm). (F) Dicrocoelium dendriticum egg from Cesspit 3 (dimensions 44 μm × 26 μm) without operculum, from Cesspit 1 (dimensions 36 μm × 23 μm). (G) Capillaria sp. egg from Cesspit 2 showing the characteristic punctuated surface coat (dimensions 44 μm × 25 μm). (F) Capillaria sp. egg showing the thick wall and elongated shape (dimension 62 μm × 28 μm). (I) Trichuris trichiura egg from Cesspit 2 (dimensions 55 μm × 25 μm). Black bars indicate 20 μm.

Figure 2

Table 1. Summary of helminth eggs and pathogenic protozoa found in each sample analysed from the three cesspits

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Scatter plot of the measured Trichuris spp. egg dimensions across samples including the size ranges for T. trichiura and T. suis reported by Beer (1976). Eggs with and without preserved polar plugs are included. The cesspit of origin is specified by colour for each egg.

Figure 4

Table 2. Dimensions (mean, standard deviation and range) in μm for the length and width of the species of parasite eggs identified in Cesspit 1, Cesspit 2 and Cesspit 3