Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-6jg5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-18T03:41:35.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High-repetition-rate, all-reflective optical guiding and electron acceleration in helium using an off-axis axicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2026

Jiří Šišma*
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Michal Nevrkla
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Filip Vitha
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Sebastian Lorenz
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
Illia Zymak
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
Alžběta Špádová
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Andrea Kollárová
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Matěj Jech
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic Faculty of Information Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Alexandr Jančárek
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Davorin Peceli
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
Carlo M. Lazzarini
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
Leonardo V. N. Goncalves
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
Gabriele M. Grittani
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
Sergei V. Bulanov
Affiliation:
ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
Jaron E. Shrock
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
Ela Rockafellow
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
Ari J. Sloss
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
Bo Miao
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
Scott W. Hancock
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
Howard M. Milchberg
Affiliation:
Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics and Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
*
Correspondence to: J. Šišma, ELI Beamlines Facility, The Extreme Light Infrastructure ERIC, Za Radnicí 835, Dolní Břežany 25241, Czech Republic. Email: jiri.sisma@eli-laser.eu.

Abstract

We present recent results on high-power guiding and laser wakefield acceleration in the ELectron Beam Accelerator (ELBA) beamline at ELI Beamlines, using the L3-HAPLS laser system (13 J, 30 fs, 0.2 Hz). By employing self-waveguiding in a 20 cm plasma channel in helium, we achieved stable acceleration of electron beams to energies of approximately 5 GeV. A novel all-reflective optical setup, including an off-axis reflective axicon, enabled efficient acceleration at 0.2 Hz and guiding at repetition rates up to 3.3 Hz. This compact single laser, single-compressor implementation of plasma channels for electron acceleration stabilizes electron pointing and enhances energy gain without requiring modifications to the laser system, paving the way for broader adoption of the technology across user facilities.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with Chinese Laser Press
Figure 0

Figure 1 Experimental setup overview. The laser beam enters the auxiliary chamber from the left and is reflected by mirror M1. Two pick-off mirrors split small portions of the pulse to form the channel-forming and probe beams, while the main pulse continues as the LWFA drive beam. The channel-forming beam is routed through the auxiliary chamber and directed into the interaction chamber toward the off-axis axicon (OAA) positioned above the gas jet SN200, where it generates the plasma channel. The probe beam is guided through its delay line and diagnostic path, and the drive beam is focused by the off-axis parabola (OAP) into the interaction region for laser wakefield acceleration. The high-power focal-spot and guided-beam diagnostics are shown on the right-hand side of the interaction chamber and include a mirror with a central aperture (HM1), an uncoated wedge (W3), an imaging lens (L5) and a mirror (SM1) that directs the attenuated pulse out of the chamber to CMOS cameras. The green beam path indicates a separate nanosecond laser system used in independent experiments to test alternative injection mechanisms. A detailed description of the setup is provided in Section 2.Figure 1 long description.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Schematic layout of the interaction chamber setup for the self-waveguided LWFA experiment. The final section of the optical system is shown, starting from mirror BM3, where the channel-forming (Bessel) beam enters the chamber, and including all subsequent mirrors BM3–BM7, the periscope, attenuator (half-wave plate, λ/2$\lambda /2$, and thin-film polarizer, TFP) and delay-line mirrors leading to the off-axis axicon (OAA) positioned above the 20 cm gas jet SN200. The LWFA drive beam passes through the axicon’s central aperture and interacts with the plasma channel formed by the Bessel beam, while the probe beam is directed from its apodization aperture via mirror PM3 to the telescope (lenses L1 and L2) with an SHG BBO crystal, then through a delay line toward the interferometer for diagnostics. A detailed description of the setup is provided in Section 2.Figure 2 long description.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Simulations of laser beam wavefront splitting and the focal spot. (a) Wavefront of the LWFA drive beam after the pick-offs at the off-axis parabola (OAP). (b) Wavefront of the channel-forming beam after 12 m of free-space propagation at the axicon surface. (c) Focal spot of the LWFA drive beam (a) on target.Figure 3 long description.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Laser beam measurements. (a) Low-power focal-spot image and corresponding analysis. (b) Laser pulse characterization using SPIDER measurement, where I$I$ denotes the measured intensity profile and FL$\mathrm{FL}$ denotes the Fourier-limited laser pulse, that is, the minimum pulse duration calculated from the measured spectral bandwidth, assuming a flat spectral phase.Figure 4 long description.

Figure 4

Figure 5 Guiding overview illustrating the interaction between the LWFA drive beam and the channel-forming beam, with the plasma column (yellow) highlighted between the focal plane and the waveguide exit plane above a 20 cm gas jet. (a) High-power focal-spot diagnostic image taken through the gas sheet during active guiding, used for online alignment monitoring. (b) High-power focal spot in vacuum, recorded using the focal-spot diagnostic camera. (c) Bessel beam focal spot, measured with a CMOS camera with $5\times$ magnification objective. (d) Image of a guided mode exiting the 20 cm plasma waveguide acquired by the guided-mode diagnostic camera when the drive beam is successfully coupled into the waveguide. (e) Zoomed-out high-power focal-spot image, the same as in (b) for comparison with (f). (f) Guided mode exiting the 3 cm plasma waveguide using a short 3 cm gas jet (see Figure 7), showing leaky modes[39] surrounding the guided beam. (g) Zoomed-out guided mode exiting the 20 cm plasma waveguide, the same as in (d). (h) Guided-mode image recorded when the drive beam misses the waveguide entrance due to laser-pointing jitter. (i) Axial neutral-gas density profiles as a function of backing pressure, measured via helium fluorescence induced by J0${J}_0$ Bessel beam ionization of the gas sheet 8 mm above the nozzle orifice with a 10 ms valve-opening time. The neutral density was calibrated using known helium backfill in the chamber[38]. (j) Top-view fluorescence image of the helium plasma channel generated by the off-axis axicon-produced J0${J}_0$ Bessel beam. Images (a)–(h) and (j) are individually normalized.Figure 5 long description.

Figure 5

Figure 6 High-repetition-rate guiding results. (a) Evolution of the guided mode over approximately 20 minutes of operation at 3.3 Hz. Each shot is represented by a line-averaged intensity profile taken from a fixed region centered on the guided mode. (b) Evolution of the guided energy deviation within a beam radius (1/e2${}^2$), together with the energy drift calculated as a moving average over a 60-shot window.Figure 6 long description.

Figure 6

Figure 7 High-repetition-rate guiding overview illustrating the setup used with a 3 cm slit nozzle. (a) Normalized top-view fluorescence image of the 3 cm helium plasma channel. (b) Axial neutral-gas density profiles measured 5 mm above the nozzle orifice with a 2 ms valve-opening time as a function of backing pressure, measured via a top-view fluorescence diagnostic.Figure 7 long description.

Figure 7

Figure 8 Selection of normalized high-energy electron spectra obtained during acceleration in a 20 cm nozzle at 0.2 Hz with a backing pressure of 37–42 bar. Each spectrum is accompanied by a corresponding pointing image, with the 1 mm spectrometer slit indicated by white dashed lines. Black curves at the bottom and right-hand side of each spectrum represent the signal integrated over divergence and energy axes, respectively.Figure 8 long description.

Figure 8

Figure 9 Statistical analysis of electron beam stability. (a) Evolution and distribution of the electron beam energy over multiple data sets acquired during optimization. (b) Statistical distribution of the electron beam pointing along the axis perpendicular to the driver laser polarization, shown as a probability-density histogram with a Gaussian fit.Figure 9 long description.