Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8v9h9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-30T08:17:37.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A quantitative model of a cooperative two-state equilibrium in DNA: experimental tests, insights, and predictions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2021

J. Michael Schurr*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Washington, Box 351700, Seattle, WA 98195-1700, USA
*
Author for correspondence: J. Michael Schurr, E-mail: jmschurr@zipcon.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Quantitative parameters for a two-state cooperative transition in duplex DNAs were finally obtained during the last 5 years. After a brief discussion of observations pertaining to the existence of the two-state equilibrium per se, the lengths, torsion, and bending elastic constants of the two states involved and the cooperativity parameter of the model are simply stated. Experimental tests of model predictions for the responses of DNA to small applied stretching, twisting, and bending stresses, and changes in temperature, ionic conditions, and sequence are described. The mechanism and significance of the large cooperativity, which enables significant DNA responses to such small perturbations, are also noted. The capacity of the model to resolve a number of long-standing and sometimes interconnected puzzles in the extant literature, including the origin of the broad pre-melting transition studied by numerous workers in the 1960s and 1970s, is demonstrated. Under certain conditions, the model predicts significant long-range attractive or repulsive interactions between hypothetical proteins with strong preferences for one or the other state that are bound to well-separated sites on the same DNA. A scenario is proposed for the activation of the ilvPG promoter on a supercoiled DNA by integration host factor.

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. UV difference spectra for T7 DNA in 0.1 M NaCl, pH 7.6, at various temperatures. Δɛ is the difference in molar absorbance between the sample at temperature T and a matching sample held at 3 °C. Data were recorded using a dual beam instrument with a reference sample held at 3 °C, while T of the other sample was raised in a uniformly increasing manner. Curves 1–6 correspond to temperatures: 3, 22, 35, 45, and 60 °C, respectively. This is Fig. 1B of Sarocchi and Guschlbauer (1973).

Figure 1

Table 1. Fixed parameters of the cooperative two-state model

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Relative extension, zF/zmax, versus pulling force F for an untwisted DNA at 293 K. Black disks are theoretical values predicted by the two-state model with the parameters in Table 1, and gray disks are experimental values of Mosconi et al. (2009). The theoretical values were computed for the two-state model by assuming that, zmax = (0.975) Lmax. Where gray experimental points are not visible, they lie underneath black theoretical points. The dashed curves were computed for non-stretchable WLC models with different values of P and the same zmax. From top to bottom, the dashed curves correspond to P = 90, 50, 44, and 38 nm. The curve for 44 nm has the smallest chi-squared value of any of the dashed curves.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. (a) Effective torsional rigidity, Ceff, versus force, F, for a single slightly twisted DNA molecule held at force, F. Thick black curve represents the theoretical values computed using the two-state model parameters given in Table 1 at T = 293 K, and α0 = 6.3 × 10−19 J. The gray squares are experimental Ceff data of Mosconi et al. (2009), and the black disks are from two different magnetic torque tweezers experiments of Lipfert et al. (2010) and Lipfert et al. (2011). The dashed black curve is computed for a non-stretchable TWLC with P = 50 nm, a rise per bp, h = 0.34 nm, and an intrinsic torsion elastic constant, α = 12.32 × 10−19 Jm. (b) Predicted fraction, fb, of bp in the b state (left axis, thick black curve) and α/αb (right axis, dashed curve) versus force, F, for the same DNA as in (a). This curve was computed for the same two-state model with the same parameters as in (a).

Figure 4

Table 2. Comparison of theoretical values for 181 bp linear, 181 bp circular, and long linear DNAs in 0.1 M univalent cations at 293 K with each other and with FPA experiments on 181 bp DNAs of the same sequence (Heath et al., 1996)

Figure 5

Table 3. Calculated properties of circular DNAs with 205–4362 bp in ~40 mM univalent cations plus 10 mM Mg2+ at 310 K.

Figure 6

Table 4. Pertinent quantities for pUC19 DNAs (N = 2686 bp) in buffers containing 39.9 or 37.2 mM univalent cations plus 10 mM Mg2+ at various T. The ET values were obtained from topoisomer distributions by Geggier et al. (2011) and 〈Lk2u ≡ (〈w2u + 〈(tt0)2u) from N/(2ET)

Figure 7

Fig. 4. Inverse bending elastic constant (1/κβ) versus fraction of bp in the a state (fa) (top axis), and versus inverse torsion elastic (1/α) (bottom axis). The black circles represent the values in Table 4, which were derived by Schurr (2019a) from experimental ET values of Geggier et al. (2011).

Figure 8

Table 5. Comparison of sequence properties of different DNAs with their measured α and fb

Figure 9

Fig. 5. Schematic illustration of the positions and average sizes of the different domains of a (light gray) and b (dark gray) states in the control (top) and insert (bottom) DNAs that are predicted by the two-state cooperative model.

Figure 10

Table 6. Calculated properties of different DNA models in 0.1 M NaCl at 293 K

Figure 11

Table 7. Comparison of theoretical (Pth) and experimental (Pexp) persistence lengths for straight and natural DNAs under the different conditions of cryoEM and j-factor measurements

Figure 12

Fig. 6. Predicted enhancement factor (EF) for the simultaneous binding of two proteins at sites separated by N bp relative to that for a separation of 1000 bp. Solid lines apply when the proteins are bound to specific 10 bp sites that are both in the b state, indicated by EF(bb) on the left ordinate. Dashed lines apply when one of the proteins binds to a site in the b state, but the other binds to a site in the a state, indicated by EF(ba) on the right ordinate. The EF(ba) curves have been scaled upward by a factor of 10. Upon increasing N, the EF(ba) values rise to approach 1.0 from below, whereas the EF(bb) values decline to approach 1.0 from above. In the absence of bound proteins, the assumed average fraction of bp in the b state (both within the sites and along the entire DNA) is either fb = 0.1 (top solid and dashed curves) or fb = 0.2 (bottom solid and dashed curves). Computed values are fitted to curves of the form, EF = 1 + (EF(0)−1.0) × Exp[−g1N(1 + g2N)] with adjustable g1 and g2. Best fit values for EF(bb) are (g1 = 0.0150, g2 = 1.45 × 10−6) for the top solid curve and (g1 = 0.0112, g2 = 8.83 × 10−6) for the bottom solid curve. Best-fit values for EF(ab) are (g1 = 0.0150, g2 = − 7.03 × 10−6) for the top dashed curve and (g1 = 0.0112, g2 = − 6.9 × 10−6) for the bottom dashed curve.