No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Redesigning the Political Science Curriculum to Incorporate LGBTQ+ Issues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 April 2025
Abstract
Political science educators have a responsibility to design their programs in a way that incorporates content that involves and engages underserved populations. In recent polls, a significant majority of Generation Z identified as LGBTQ+, representing a percentage that is larger than those who identify as African American or Hispanic (Jones 2024; Public Religion Research Institute 2024). Implementing changes in mainline political science courses (e.g., introduction to American national government, the presidency, and comparative politics) will allow the discipline to better serve LGBTQ+ students. Ample examples involving LGBTQ+-themed content provide instruction in a wide battery of political science courses. Pivoting into a more supportive pedagogy may be a successful strategy for addressing the oncoming “population cliff” (i.e., a projected decline in college enrollment) that will impact the number of students beginning college in the future. Whereas the process will require substantial investment in energy to initiate, an updated approach to teaching political science courses will reap dividends in terms of student interest, engagement with course material, and LGBTQ+ representation in the profession.
Information
- Type
- Article
- Information
- PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 58 , Issue 3: Contemporary and Future LGBTQ+ Scholarship in Political Science , July 2025 , pp. 400 - 405
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association
References
REFERENCES
Atchison, Amy L. 2013. “The Practical Process of Gender Mainstreaming in the Political Science Curriculum.” Politics & Gender 9 (2): 228–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoub, Phillip M. 2022. “Not That Niche: Making Room for the Study of LGBTIQ People in Political Science.” European Journal of Politics and Gender 5 (2): 154–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoub, Phillip M., and Garretson, Jeremiah. 2017. “Getting the Message Out: Media Context and Global Changes in Attitudes Toward Homosexuality.” Comparative Political Studies 50 (8): 1055–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayoub, Phillip M., and Stoeckl, Kristina. 2024. “The Global Resistance to LGBTIQ Rights.” Journal of Democracy 35 (1): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, Carlos A. 2010. From the Closet to the Courtroom: Five LGBT Rights Lawsuits That Have Changed Our Nation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Carlos A. 2017. The First Amendment and LGBT Equality: A Contentious History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, Carlos A. 2019. After Marriage Equality: The Future of LGBT Rights. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Dan. 2024. “Colleges Were Already Bracing for an ‘Enrollment Cliff.’ Now There Might Be a Second One.” The Chronicle of Higher Education, February 7. www.chronicle.com/article/colleges-were-already-bracing-for-an-enrollment-cliff-now-there-might-be-a-second-one.Google Scholar
Bergersen, Meghan, Klar, Samara, and Schmitt, Elizabeth. 2018. “Intersectionality and Engagement among the LGBTQ+ Community.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 39 (2): 196–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biden, Joe. 2022. “Executive Order on Advancing Equality for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Intersex Individuals.” Washington, DC: The White House, June 15. www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/06/15/executive-order-on-advancing-equality-for-lesbian-gay-bisexual-transgender-queer-and-intersex-individuals.Google Scholar
Brandle, Shawna M. 2020. “It’s (Not) in the Reading: American Government Textbooks’ Limited Representation of Historically Marginalized Groups.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (4): 734–40.Google Scholar
Brettschneider, Marla, Burgess, Susan, and Keating, Christine. 2017. LGBTQ Politics: A Critical Reader. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Brownworth, Victoria. 2023. “LGBTQ+ History: When NOW Purged Lesbians from Its Feminist Movement.” The Advocate, October 23. www.advocate.com/history/betty-friedan-anti-lesbian.Google Scholar
Campbell, David. 2019. “What Social Scientists Have Learned About Civic Education: A Review of the Literature.” Peabody Journal of Education 94 (1): 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, Ta-Nehisi. 2016. “The Great Schism.” The Atlantic, November 11. www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/10/the-great-schism/246640.Google Scholar
Combahee River Collective Statement. 1977. A Black Feminist Statement. www.blackpast.org/african-american-history/combahee-river-collective-statement-1977.Google Scholar
Copley, Paul, and Douthett, Edward. 2020. “The Enrollment Cliff, Mega-Universities, COVID-19, and the Changing Landscape of US Colleges.” The CPA Journal 90 (9): 22–27.Google Scholar
Dawson, Lindsey, Sobel, Laurie, Pestaina, Kaye, Kates, Jennifer, Artiga, Samantha, and Burns, Alice. 2024. “The Biden Administration’s Final Rule on Section 1557 Non-Discrimination Regulations Under the ACA.” KFF, May 15. www.kff.org/affordable-care-act/issue-brief/the-biden-administrations-final-rule-on-section-1557-non-discrimination-regulations-under-the-aca.Google Scholar
De Souza, Lucy D., and Schmader, Toni. 2024. “When People Do Allyship: A Typology of Allyship Action.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 29 (1): 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683241232732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dessel, Adrienne B., Goodman, Kevin D., and Woodford, Michael R.. 2017. “LGBT Discrimination on Campus and Heterosexual Bystanders: Understanding Intentions to Intervene.” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 10 (2): 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Stephen M. 2016. Fragmented Citizens: The Changing Landscape of Gay and Lesbian Lives. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. 2008. Dishonorable Passions: Sodomy Laws in America, 1861–2003. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. 2009. Gaylaw: Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman-Murray, Andrew, McKinnon, Scott, and Dominey-Howes, Dale. 2014. “Queer Domicide: LGBT Displacement and Home Loss in Natural Disaster Impact, Response, and Recovery.” Home Cultures 11 (2): 237–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harackiewicz, Judith M., Smith, Jessi L., and Priniski, Stacy J.. 2016. “Interest Matters: The Importance of Promoting Interest in Education.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (2): 220–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishiyama, John. 2022. “An Introduction to the ‘Rethinking Political Science Education’ Task Force.” Political Science Today 2 (1): 3–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishiyama, John. 2023. “Whither Political Science in a Post-Pandemic World? Challenges, Trends, and Opportunities.” Perspectives on Politics 21 (2): 419–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Jeffrey M. 2024. “U.S. LGBT Identification Steady at 7.2%.” Gallup, March 14. https://news.gallup.com/poll/470708/lgbt-identification-steady.aspx.Google Scholar
Josephson, Jyl, and Marques, Thaís. 2017. “Unfulfilled Promises: How Queer Feminist Political Theory Could Transform Political Science.” LGBTQ Politics: A Critical Reader 3:234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Samantha J. 2022. “Actions for Queering American Public Administration.” Administration & Society 54 (1): 145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Robert C., Mettler, Suzanne, Pepinsky, Thomas B., Roberts, Kenneth M., and Valelly, Richard. 2019. “The Trump Presidency and American Democracy: A Historical and Comparative Analysis.” Perspectives on Politics 17 (2): 470–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magni, Gabriele, and Reynolds, Andrew. 2024. “Candidate Identity and Campaign Priming: Analyzing Voter Support for Pete Buttigieg’s Presidential Run as an Openly Gay Man.” Political Research Quarterly 77 (1): 184–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallinson, Daniel J. 2021. “Who Are Your Neighbors? The Role of Ideology and Decline of Geographic Proximity in the Diffusion of Policy Innovations.” Policy Studies Journal 49 (1): 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQuiston, James. 2025. “Replication Data for ‘Redesigning the Political Science Curriculum to Incorporate LGBTQ Issues.’” PS: Political Science & Politics. DOI:10.7910/DVN/ZWLBG8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Joane. 2019. “Masculinity and Nationalism: Gender and Sexuality in the Making of Nations.” In Celebrating 40 Years of Ethnic and Racial Studies, ed. Bulmer, Martin and Solomos, John, 95–122. Philadelphia: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novkov, Julie, and Barclay, Scott. 2010. “Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, and the Transgendered in Political Science: Report on a Discipline-Wide Survey.” PS: Political Science & Politics 43 (1): 95–106.Google Scholar
Pierceson, Jason A. 2022. Before Bostock: The Accidental LGBTQ Precedent of Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Public Religion Research Institute. 2024. “A Political and Cultural Glimpse into America’s Future: Generation Z’s Views on Generational Change and the Challenges and Opportunities Ahead.” January 25. www.prri.org/research/generation-zs-views-on-generational-change-and-the-challenges-and-opportunities-ahead-a-political-and-cultural-glimpse-into-americas-future.Google Scholar
Reber, Rolf, Canning, Elizabeth A., and Harackiewicz, Judith M.. 2018. “Personalized Education to Increase Interest.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 27 (6): 449–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reid, Rebecca A., and Curry, Todd A.. 2019. “Are We There Yet? Addressing Diversity in Political Science Subfields.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52 (2): 281–86.Google Scholar
Renn, Kristen A. 2022. “Success for LGBT College and University Students.” In Strategies for Supporting Inclusion and Diversity in the Academy: Higher Education, Aspiration and Inequality, ed. Crimmins, Gail, 183–200. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richert, Lucas. 2009. “Reagan, Regulation, and the FDA: The US Food and Drug Administration’s Response to HIV/AIDS, 1980–90.” Canadian Journal of History 44 (3): 467–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, Katherine. 2023. “118th Congress Has Record Number of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Members.” Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/01/11/118th-congress-breaks-record-for-lesbian-gay-and-bisexual-representation.Google Scholar
Sherrill, Kenneth S., and Vogler, David J.. 1982. Power, Policy, and Participation: An Introduction to American Government. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. 2015. “Leveraging Diversity in Political Science for Institutional and Disciplinary Change.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (3): 454–58.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven R., and McConaughey, Meghan. 2021. “The Political Science Undergraduate Major and Its Future: The Wahlke Report—Revisited.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (2): 358–62.Google Scholar
Türk, H. Bahadır. 2023. “Demonization, Derision, Polarization: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s Political Rhetoric.” In Debasing Political Rhetoric: Dissing Opponents, Journalists, and Minorities in Populist Leadership Communication, ed. Feldman, Ofer, 183–99. Singapore: Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Human Rights Council. 2022. “Forcibly Displaced LGBT Persons Face Major Challenges in Search of Safe Haven.” United Nations Human Rights Council, May 16. www.ohchr.org/en/statements/2022/05/forcibly-displaced-lgbt-persons-face-major-challenges-search-safe-haven.Google Scholar
Williams Institute. 2022. “Experiences of LGBTQ People in Four-Year Colleges and Graduate Programs: Williams Institute.” Los Angeles: UCLA School of Law. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/LGBTQ-College-Grad-School-May-2022.pdf.Google Scholar
McQuiston supplementary material
McQuiston supplementary material
File
216 KB