Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-bp2c4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T12:43:44.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On state instability of the bi-stable flow past a notchback bluff body

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2021

Kan He
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on the Track of Ministry of Education, School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, PR China Division of Fluid Dynamics, Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
Guglielmo Minelli
Affiliation:
Aerodynamics, Volvo Cars, SE-41878 Gothenburg, Sweden
Xinchao Su
Affiliation:
Division of Fluid Dynamics, Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
Guangjun Gao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on the Track of Ministry of Education, School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, PR China
Siniša Krajnović*
Affiliation:
Division of Fluid Dynamics, Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Email address for correspondence: sinisa@chalmers.se

Abstract

The wake of a notchback Ahmed body presenting a bi-stable nature is investigated by performing wind tunnel experiments and large-eddy simulations. Attention is confined to the Reynolds number ($Re$) influence on the wake state instability within $5\times 10^{4}\leq Re \leq 25\times 10^{4}$. Experimental observations suggest a wake bi-stability with low-frequency switches under low $Re$. The wake becomes ‘tri-stable’ with the increase of $Re$ with the introduction of a new symmetric state. The higher presence of the symmetric state can be considered as a symmetrization of the wake bi-stability with an increasing $Re$. The wake symmetry under high $Re$ attributed to the highly frequent switches of the wake is extremely sensitive to small yaw angles, showing the feature of bi-stable flows. The wake asymmetry is confirmed in numerical simulations with both low and high $Re$. The wake asymmetries are indicated by the wake separation, the reattachment and the wake dynamics identified by the proper orthogonal decomposition. However, the turbulence level is found to be significantly higher with a higher $Re$. This leads to a higher possibility to break the asymmetric state, resulting in highly frequent switches showing symmetry.

JFM classification

Information

Type
JFM Rapids
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. The geometric model: (a) side view, (b) front view.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Pressure gradients, $\partial C_{pd} / \partial y$. (a) Pressure taps on the deck. (b) The normalized p.d.f. of $\partial C_{pd} / \partial y$ as a function of $Re$. (cf) Time history of $\partial C_{pd} / \partial y$ with p.d.f.: (c) $Re=5 \times 10^{4}$, (d) $Re=10 \times 10^{4}$, (e) $Re=15 \times 10^{4}$, (f) $Re=20 \times 10^{4}$.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Time history of $\partial C_{pd} / \partial y$. The black line is the signal obtained from the pressure monitors. The red line is the filtered signal using an averaging filter over windows of 0.5 s. (a) $Re=5 \times 10^{4}$, (b) $Re=20 \times 10^{4}$.

Figure 3

Table 1. Probabilities of the current wake state, $S_{t}$, depending on the previous states, $S_{t-1}$. $P(E_{1}=E_{2})$ is the conditional probability of the event $E_{1}$, given by the event $E_{2}$. The events are considered at 0.5 Hz.

Figure 4

Figure 4. The expected value of the duration time for the asymmetric state as a function of Reynolds number.

Figure 5

Figure 5. The time history of the deck pressure gradient under yaws: (a) ${\rm yaw}=0^{\circ }$, (b) ${\rm yaw}=0.5^{\circ }$, (c) ${\rm yaw}=-0.5^{\circ }$. Data obtained under $Re=25 \times 10^{4}$.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Mean streamlines and spanwise vorticity $\overline {\varOmega _{y}}$ on the $Y_{1}$ and $Y_{2}$ planes. Here $Y_{1}$ and $Y_{2}$ are symmetric to the central section and the distance between $Y_{1}$ and $Y_{2}$ is $D_{P3}$=0.5$W$ (half-width of the model). (a,b) $Re=5 \times 10^{4}$, (c,d) $Re=15 \times 10^{4}$, (e,f) $Re=20 \times 10^{4}$.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Flow structures projected on the $Z_{1}$ plane, located at $H_{P1}=0.844H$ above the bottom of the model. (ac) Distribution of $\bar {u}$. (df) Mode 2 of POD. (gi) Distribution of TKE. For (ai), the left, the middle and the right columns are at $Re=5 \times 10^{4}$, $Re=15 \times 10^{4}$ and $Re=20 \times 10^{4}$, respectively. Profiles on the probe line, $L_{p}$, at $D_{P1}=0.3H$ from the slant: (j) $\bar {u}$, (k) TKE.

Figure 8

Table 2. Spatial resolutions of the grids.

Figure 9

Table 3. Comparison of $\overline {\partial C_{pd} / \partial y}$ between experiments and LES.

Figure 10

Figure 8. Comparison of the shedding frequency of the C-pillar vortex between experiments and LES. (a) $Re=5 \times 10^{4}$, (b) $Re=15 \times 10^{4}$, (c) $Re=20 \times 10^{4}$.