Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-6mz5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T03:56:02.301Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cheilospirura hamulosa (Nematoda: Acuariidae) infection in indigenous chickens in Bangladesh: epidemiology, pathology and anthelmintic efficacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2025

Akter Shirin
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Nusrat Nadia
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Md. Shahadat Hossain
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Sharmin Shahid Labony
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Sumaya Naznin Ritu
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Md. Haydar Ali
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh Department of Pathology and Parasitology, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh
Umme Razia Islam
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Romana Parvin
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Sadia Afroz Esha
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Anita Rani Dey
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Md. Mahmudul Alam
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery and Theriogenology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Mohammad Zahangir Alam
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Md. Abdul Alim
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
Anisuzzaman*
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
*
Corresponding author: Anisuzzaman; Email: zaman.a@bau.edu.bd

Abstract

Helminth infection is highly prevalent in indigenous chickens reared in semi-scavenging/ scavenging systems in Bangladesh. Here, we estimated the prevalence of gizzard worm infection in indigenous chickens, the detection of the worm-induced pathologies, the development of ex vivo cultural protocol, and anthelmintic efficacy. We randomly collected and examined 390 chickens and isolated worms from the gizzard and proventriculus. The isolated worms were identified as Cheilospirura hamulosa Diesing, 1861. The overall prevalence of C. hamulosa was 33.1% (129 out of 390). Prevalence of the worm was almost similar in both sexes but significantly (p <0.05) higher in adult chickens (44.3%) and in the summer season (47.1%). In heavy infections, C. hamulosa destroyed the muscular layer of the gizzard. The presence of brown necrotic tissues and curd-like caseous materials was detected in the affected gizzards. In severe cases, the horny lining of the gizzard was inflamed, necrotized and marked by multiple holes and brick-red colored spots. Liquefied, fetid materials oozed out from the muscular layer in extensive cases. Histopathological examination showed marked infiltrations of eosinophils. In serum-supplemented M199 and DMEM, adult C. hamulosa survived well and reproduced. Levamisole (LEV) and ivermectin (IVM) efficiently killed the worm. However, albendazole (ABZ), mebendazole (MBZ) and piperazine (PPZ) did not kill the worms. Our results suggest that C. hamulosa is highly prevalent in semi-scavenging chickens in Bangladesh. LEV and IVM can be used to treat and control the infection in chickens.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Overall prevalence and morphological features of Cheilospirura hamulosa. (A) Overall prevalence of C. Hamulosa in chickens. (B) Adult parasite (whole mount). (C) Anterior part of the worm. Dotted yellow lines are cordons. (D) Posterior part of the male. Blue arrow indicates spicule. (E) Posterior part of the female.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Factors associated with Cheilospirurahamulosa infections. (A) Sex-wise prevalence, (B) age-wise prevalence, and (C) season-wise prevalence of C. Hamulosa. M, months.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Gross pathological changes induced by Cheilospirura hamulosa. (A) Mild infection with C. Hamulosa. Dotted circular line indicates small lesion. (B) Adult C. Hamulosa (black arrow) attached to the muscular wall of the same gizzard after removal of koilin lining. (C) Heavy infection with the worm. Development of sac-like or tumor-like growth. Green dotted line indicates the tumor-like growth of the gizzard. (D) Inner surface of the same gizzard showing severe damage of the muscular wall and the necrotized koilin lining. (E) Serosal surface of normal gizzard of age and sex-matched ICs. (F) Internal surface of the same gizzard.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Histopathological changes induced by Cheilospirura hamulosa. (A) Histological sections of the age and sex-matched indigenous chickens (ICs) as mentioned in Figure 3E, F. Left panel is at low magnification (10x objective). Right panel is at higher magnification (40x objective). (B) Histological sections of the age- and sex-matched ICs as mentioned in Figure 3C, D. Left panel is at low magnification (10x objective). Dotted lines indicate cross sections of the parasite. Right panel is at higher magnification (40x objective). Dotted lines indicate cross sections of the parasite. Green arrows indicate inflammatory cells.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Development of an ex vivo culture protocol for Cheilospirura hamulosa. (A) Selection of media for the ex vivo culture of C. Hamulosa. (B) Viability of C. Hamulosa after addition of nutrient supplements. FCS, fetal calf serum; DS, duck serum; CS, chicken serum.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Efficacy of different commercially available anthelmintics against Cheilospirura hamulosa. LEV, levamisole; IVM; ivermectin; ABZ, albendazole; MBZ, mebedazole; PPZ, piperazine.