Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-tw422 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-24T20:03:11.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Echoes of the Past: Gender Differences in Perceiving Past Temporal Focus in Innovation Funding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2025

Lun Li
Affiliation:
Beijing Normal University, Beijing, P.R. China
Xi Xi*
Affiliation:
Renmin University of China, China
Xiwei Yi
Affiliation:
Peking University, China
Jizhen Li
Affiliation:
Tsinghua University, Beijing, P.R. China
Xue Liu
Affiliation:
Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
*
Corresponding author: Xi Xi; Email: xix@ruc.edu.cn

Abstract

Evaluators, tasked with making funding decisions under conditions of incomplete information and uncertainty, are particularly susceptible to the influence of temporality and gender expectations. Drawing on the literature on signaling theory and gender expectations, this research examines the importance of past temporal focus in determining innovation funding decisions. Our empirical evidence suggests that innovation projects that focus on past events are more likely to receive favorable evaluations as past temporal focus signals better learning capacity among innovators. Moreover, we build on the signal credibility and visibility literature to support the notion that female-dominated presenting teams that emphasize past actions receive higher evaluations because the learning capacity signal is deemed more credible for women and female evaluators are more reactive to past-related signals, leading to higher evaluations for innovations with a past-focused narrative. Our study contributes to the literature on temporal focus and signal effectiveness and provides implications for mitigating the gender gap in accessing funding through temporal rhetoric.

摘要

摘要

创新基金评审者在信息不完全和不确定性较高的情况下做资助决策, 容易受到时间和性别期望的影响。本文借鉴信号理论和性别期望的文献, 考察了过去时间焦点在决定创新资助决策中的影响机制。我们的实证证据表明, 采纳过去时间焦点叙事的创新项目更有可能获得积极的评价, 这是因为过去时间焦点能有效传递创新者的学习能力。此外, 借鉴信号可信度和可见性文献, 我们发现女性主导的展示团队采纳过去时间焦点叙事时会获得更高评价, 因为来自女性的学习能力信号被认为更加可信; 女性评审者对过去时间焦点反应更强, 导致采纳过去时间焦点叙事的创新项目获得更高评价。本文的研究结果对时间焦点和信号有效性的文献做出了贡献, 并为通过时间叙事策略缓解资助决策中的性别差距提供了启示。

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Association for Chinese Management Research.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This article was originally published with an incorrect affiliation for one author. The error has been corrected and the online HTML and PDF versions updated.

References

Alipour, K. K., Mohammed, S., & Martinez, P. N. 2017. Incorporating temporality into implicit leadership and followership theories: Exploring inconsistencies between time-based expectations and actual behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(2): 300316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., & Tushman, M. L. 2001. Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26(4): 645663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armanios, D. E., Eesley, C. E., Li, J., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 2017. How entrepreneurs leverage institutional intermediaries in emerging economies to acquire public resources. Strategic Management Journal, 38(7): 13731390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bafera, J., & Kleinert, S. 2023. Signaling theory in entrepreneurship research: A systematic review and research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(6): 24192464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettinazzi, E. L. M., & Zollo, M. 2022. Stakeholder orientation and experiential learning: Evidence from corporate acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies, 59(6): 14221459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bian, J., Greenberg, J., Li, J., & Wang, Y. 2022. Good to go first? Position effects in expert evaluation of early-stage ventures. Management Science, 68(1): 300315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blagoev, B., Hernes, T., Kunisch, S., & Schultz, M. 2024. Time as a research lens: A conceptual review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 50(6): 21522196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botelho, T. L., & Gertsberg, M. 2022. The disciplining effect of status: Evaluator status awards and observed gender bias in evaluations. Management Science, 68(7): 53115329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudreau, K. J., Guinan, E. C., Lakhani, K. R., & Riedl, C. 2016. Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: Intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science. Management Science, 62(10): 27652783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briker, R., Walter, F., & Cole, M. S. 2020. The consequences of (not) seeing eye-to-eye about the past: The role of supervisor–team fit in past temporal focus for supervisors’ leadership behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(3): 244262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K. W., Li, S. Y., & Zhu, J. J. 2018.Good to be novel? Understanding how idea feasibility affects idea adoption decision making in crowdsourcing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 43(1): 5268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, D. R., & Cho, H. 2008. Organizational memory influences new product success. Journal of Business Research, 61(1): 1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J., & Nadkarni, S. 2017. It’s about time! CEOs’ temporal dispositions, temporal leadership, and corporate entrepreneurship. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1): 3166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y.-S., Lin, M.-J.-J., & Chang, C.-H. 2009. The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(2): 152158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombo, O. 2021. The use of signals in new-venture financing: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 47(1): 237259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. 2011. Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1): 3967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Reutzel, C. R., DesJardine, M. R., & Zhou, Y. S. 2025. Signaling theory: State of the theory and its future. Journal of Management, 51(1): 2461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correia, S. 2014. REGHDFE: Stata module to perform linear or instrumental-variable regression absorbing any number of high-dimensional fixed effects. Boston: Boston College Department of Economics.Google Scholar
Corsini, A., Pezzoni, M., & Visentin, F. 2022. What makes a productive Ph.D. student? Research Policy, 51(10): 104561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criscuolo, P., Dahlander, L., Grohsjean, T., & Salter, A. 2021. The sequence effect in panel decisions: Evidence from the evaluation of research and development projects. Organization Science, 32(4): 9871008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defazio, D., Franzoni, C., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. 2021. How pro-social framing affects the success of crowdfunding projects: The role of emphasis and information crowdedness. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2): 357378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deichmann, D., & van den Ende, J. 2014. Rising from failure and learning from success: The role of past experience in radical initiative taking. Organization Science, 25(3): 670690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DesJardine, M., & Bansal, P. 2019. One step forward, two steps back: How negative external evaluations can shorten organizational time horizons. Organization Science, 30(4): 761780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DesJardine, M. R., & Shi, W. 2021. How temporal focus shapes the influence of executive compensation on risk taking. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1): 265292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Pietro, F., Grilli, L., & Masciarelli, F. 2023. Talking about a revolution? Costly and costless signals and the role of innovativeness in equity crowdfunding. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(2): 831862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrev, S. D., & Verhaal, J. C. 2024. Organizational authenticity: How craft‐based ventures manage authentic identities and audience appeal. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 18(4): 740769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddleston, K. A., Ladge, J. J., Mitteness, C., & Balachandra, L. 2016. Do you see what I see? Signaling effects of gender and firm characteristics on financing entrepreneurial ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(3): 489514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Y., Lewis, T., Cardon, M. S., & Hentschel, T. 2023. Signaling diversity debt: Startup gender composition and the gender gap in joiners’ interest. Academy of Management Journal, 66(5): 14691500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamache, D. L., & McNamara, G. 2019. Responding to bad press: How CEO temporal focus influences the sensitivity to negative media coverage of acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3): 918943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleasure, R. 2024. Contrasting the response to past and future oriented appeals for help on donation-based crowdfunding platforms. European Journal of Information Systems, 33(6): 953974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwyther, H., & Holland, C. 2012. The effect of age, gender and attitudes on self-regulation in driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 45: 1928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hofstede, G. 2011. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, E. A., & Silver, R. C. 1998. Getting “stuck” in the past: Temporal orientation and coping with trauma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5): 11461163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, L., Joshi, P., Wakslak, C., & Wu, A. 2021. Sizing up entrepreneurial potential: Gender differences in communication and investor perceptions of long-term growth and scalability. Academy of Management Journal, 64(3): 716740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inesi, M. E., & Cable, D. M. 2015. When accomplishments come back to haunt you: The negative effect of competence signals on women’s performance evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 68(3): 615657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, L.-J., Guo, T., Zhang, Z., & Messervey, D. 2009. Looking into the past: Cultural differences in perception and representation of past information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4): 761769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, A. H., & Audia, P. G. 2012. Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback. Academy of Management Review, 37(2): 211231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanze, D., Huang, L., Conley, M. A., & Higgins, E. T. 2018. We ask men to win and women not to lose: Closing the gender gap in startup funding. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2): 586614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karniol, R., & Ross, M. 1996. The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1): 593620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katila, R. 2002. New product search over time: Past ideas in their prime? Academy of Management Journal, 45(5): 9951010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinert, S. 2024. The promise of new ventures’ growth ambitions in early-stage funding: On the crossroads between cheap talk and credible signals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 48(1): 274309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M., & Huang, L. 2018. Gender bias, social impact framing, and evaluation of entrepreneurial ventures. Organization Science, 29(1): 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Y. G., Koval, C. Z., & Lee, S. S. 2023. The glass wall and the gendered evaluation of role expansion in freelancing careers. Academy of Management Journal, 66(4): 10421070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levasseur, L., Shipp, A. J., Fried, Y., Rousseau, D. M., & Zimbardo, P. G. 2020. New perspectives on time perspective and temporal focus. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(3): 235243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lo, J. Y., & Li, H. 2018. In the eyes of the beholder: The effect of participant diversity on perceived merits of collaborative innovations. Research Policy, 47(7): 12291242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, S., Bartol, K. M., Venkataramani, V., Zheng, X., & Liu, X. 2019. Pitching novel ideas to the boss: The interactive effects of employees’ idea enactment and influence tactics on creativity assessment and implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2): 579606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martens, M. L., Jennings, J. E., & Jennings, P. D. 2007. Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5): 11071132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClean, E. J., Kim, S., & Martinez, T. 2022. Which ideas for change are endorsed? How agentic and communal voice affects endorsement differently for men and for women. Academy of Management Journal, 65(2): 634655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. Proceedings of Workshop at ICLR. 2013.Google Scholar
Mohammed, S., & Harrison, D. A. 2013. The clocks that time us are not the same: A theory of temporal diversity, task characteristics, and performance in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2): 244256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moradi, M., Dass, M., Arnett, D., & Badrinarayanan, V. 2024. The time-varying effects of rhetorical signals in crowdfunding campaigns. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 52(2): 370398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, J., Melwani, S., Loewenstein, J., & Deal, J. J. 2018. Reframing the decision-makers’ dilemma: Towards a social context model of creative idea recognition. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1): 94110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadkarni, S., & Chen, J. 2014. Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6): 18101833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadkarni, S., Chen, T., & Chen, J. 2016. The clock is ticking! Executive temporal depth, industry velocity, and competitive aggressiveness. Strategic Management Journal, 37(6): 11321153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadkarni, S., Pan, L., & Chen, T. 2019. Only timeline will tell: Temporal framing of competitive announcements and rivals’ responses. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1): 117143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, K. R., & Binder, J. K. 2021. I am what I pledge: The importance of value alignment for mobilizing backers in reward-based crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(3): 531561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, L., Li, X., Chen, J., & Chen, T. 2020. Sounds novel or familiar? Entrepreneurs’ framing strategy in the venture capital market. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(2): 105930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, L., McNamara, G., Lee, J. J., Haleblian, J. (J.), & Devers, C. E. 2018. Give it to us straight (most of the time): Top managers’ use of concrete language and its effect on investor reactions. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8): 22042225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, G., Schwartz, H. A., Sap, M., Kern, M. L., Weingarten, E., Eichstaedt, J. C., Berger, J., Stillwell, D., Kosinski, M., Ungar, L. H., and Seligman, M. E. P. 2017. Living in the past, present, and future: Measuring temporal orientation with language. Journal of Personality, 85(2): 270280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plummer, L. A., Allison, T. H., & Connelly, B. L. 2016. Better together? Signaling interactions in new venture pursuit of initial external capital. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5): 15851604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polidoro, F. 2020. Knowledge, routines, and cognitive effects in nonmarket selection environments: An examination of the regulatory review of innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 41(13): 24002435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinovich, A., & Morton, T. A. 2012. Ghosts of the past and dreams of the future: The impact of temporal focus on responses to contextual ingroup devaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(3): 397410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rindova, V. P., & Martins, L. L. 2022. Futurescapes: Imagination and temporal reorganization in the design of strategic narratives. Strategic Organization, 20(1): 200224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, P. L., Casali, G. L., & Jacobson, D. 2012. Managing open incremental process innovation: Absorptive capacity and distributed learning. Research Policy, 41(5): 822832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, X. (S.), Kim, H., & Li, J. 2022. Funding ventures similar to one of us: How status dynamics within heterogeneous groups affect venture evaluation. Strategic Management Journal, 43(10): 21352155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, W., Zhang, Y., & Hoskisson, R. E. 2019. Examination of CEO–CFO social interaction through language style matching: Outcomes for the CFO and the organization. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2): 383414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipp, A. J. 2020. Temporal focus: A review of the past with an eye to the future. In Grouzet, F. M. E. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psychology of time travel and temporality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190256685.013.9Google Scholar
Shipp, A. J., & Aeon, B. 2019. Temporal focus: Thinking about the past, present, and future. Current Opinion in Psychology, 26: 3743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. 2009. Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1): 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, N. L., & Levine, L. J. 1987. Thinking about feelings: The development and organization of emotional knowledge. In Snow, R. E., and Farr, M. J. (Eds), Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction, 3: 165-197. Hillsdale, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suddaby, R., Foster, W. M., & Quinn Trank, C. 2010. Rhetorical history as a source of competitive advantage. In Joel, B. A. C., and Lampel, J. (Eds.), Advances in strategic management: 147173. Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
van Balen, T., Tarakci, M., & Sood, A. 2019. Do disruptive visions pay off? The impact of disruptive entrepreneurial visions on venture funding. Journal of Management Studies, 56(2): 303342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vohs, K. D., & Schmeichel, B. J. 2003. Self-regulation and extended now: Controlling the self alters the subjective experience of time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2): 217230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ye, P., O’Brien, J., Carnes, C. M., & Hasan, I. 2021. The influence of bondholder concentration and temporal orientation on investments in R&D. Journal of Management, 47(3): 683715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Shi, W., & Connelly, B. L. 2024. Screening theory and its boundaries: Investigation of screen credibility, necessity, and salience in the context of corporate venture capital. Academy of Management Journal, 67(5): 13591391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P., Priem, R., Wang, D., & Li, S. 2023. Strategic rhythms: Insights and research directions. Journal of Management, 49(6): 19391964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. 1999. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6): 12711288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar