Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-zlvph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T16:19:56.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Towards an integrated materials characterization toolbox

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2011

Ian M. Robertson*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801
Christopher A. Schuh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
John S. Vetrano
Affiliation:
Materials Sciences and Engineering Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, District of Columbia 20585
Nigel D. Browning
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science and Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California—Davis, Davis, California 95616; and Condensed Matter and Materials Division, Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550
David P. Field
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164
Dorte Juul Jensen
Affiliation:
Risø National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, Materials Research Division, Technical University of Denmark, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Michael K. Miller
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Ian Baker
Affiliation:
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755
David C. Dunand
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208
Rafal Dunin-Borkowski
Affiliation:
Center for Electron Nanoscopy, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Bernd Kabius
Affiliation:
Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439
Tom Kelly
Affiliation:
Cameca Instruments Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin 53711
Sergio Lozano-Perez
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, OxfordOX1 3PH, United Kingdom
Amit Misra
Affiliation:
MPA-CINT, MS K771, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Gregory S. Rohrer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Anthony D. Rollett
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Mitra L. Taheri
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
Greg B. Thompson
Affiliation:
Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487
Michael Uchic
Affiliation:
Materials & Manufacturing Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 45433
Xun-Li Wang
Affiliation:
Neutron Scattering Science Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
Gary Was
Affiliation:
Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: ianr@illinois.edu

Abstract

The material characterization toolbox has recently experienced a number of parallel revolutionary advances, foreshadowing a time in the near future when material scientists can quantify material structure evolution across spatial and temporal space simultaneously. This will provide insight to reaction dynamics in four-dimensions, spanning multiple orders of magnitude in both temporal and spatial space. This study presents the authors’ viewpoint on the material characterization field, reviewing its recent past, evaluating its present capabilities, and proposing directions for its future development. Electron microscopy; atom probe tomography; x-ray, neutron and electron tomography; serial sectioning tomography; and diffraction-based analysis methods are reviewed, and opportunities for their future development are highlighted. Advances in surface probe microscopy have been reviewed recently and, therefore, are not included [D.A. Bonnell et al.: Rev. Modern Phys. in Review]. In this study particular attention is paid to studies that have pioneered the synergetic use of multiple techniques to provide complementary views of a single structure or process; several of these studies represent the state-of-the-art in characterization and suggest a trajectory for the continued development of the field. Based on this review, a set of grand challenges for characterization science is identified, including suggestions for instrumentation advances, scientific problems in microstructure analysis, and complex structure evolution problems involving material damage. The future of microstructural characterization is proposed to be one not only where individual techniques are pushed to their limits, but where the community devises strategies of technique synergy to address complex multiscale problems in materials science and engineering.

Information

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Bright-field transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of the dislocation structure around a crack tip in Si. The diffraction vector was g = 220 and the foil orientation [001]. From Ref. 39. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced with permission.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. (a) Illustration of the nonuniform sampling of Fourier space brought about by the acquisition of a tilt series. If a simple back-projection is performed, then the relatively large number of data points at low frequencies results in a blurred reconstruction; (b) two-dimensional (2D) test object; (c) illustration of the effect on reconstructed image of increasing tilt range (shown in the lower left corner of each image); (d) illustration of the effect on increasing the number of images (number given in the lower right corner of each image). Adapted from Ref. 74

Figure 2

FIG. 3. High-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) scanning TEM (STEM) imaging of Pt and PtCr catalyst particles supported on carbon black. (a) single HAADF image of Pt features, (b) reconstructed volume, (c) three-dimensional (3D) perspective view of a full structure showing PtCr catalyst particles on carbon black. (d) Close examination of an individual Pt particle showing individual crystallographic facets. For (a,b), the tilt range was from −70° to +66°, with images acquired in 1° increments. From Ref. 83. Copyright John Wiley and Sons, reproduced with permission.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. (a) Composite image of a W-to-Si contact showing the volumetric elemental distribution maps for Ti, N, and Co and (b) 3D chemical state map extracted from the shape of the core-loss edge of the Si L23 peak. From Ref. 84. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced with permission.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Electron tomographic reconstruction from a series of plasmon loss images of silicon nanoparticles embedded in silicon oxide. The nanoparticles are revealed by isosurface rendering with the reconstructed plasmon loss image shown as the background fog. From Ref. 85. Copyright AIP, reproduced with permission.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. 3D view of dislocations near a crack tip in silicon: (a) snapshots of the reconstructed volume; the image is the negative of that shown in Fig. 1. (b) and (c) Snapshots about orthogonal rotational axes of dislocations in reconstructed volume. Images courtesy of G. Liu, after work in Ref. 38.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. A 3D reconstruction of the magnetic field of NiFe(27 nm)/Cr(3 nm). (a)-(c) Through-focus series showing a series of an elliptical particle. (d) 3D magnetic vector potential along the x-z plane of the element displayed as a vector field plot. The colors describe the z component of the vector potential. From Ref. 91. Copyright Cambridge Journals, reproduced with permission.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Examples of TEM sample supports/holders that permit stimulation of samples, including (a) conventional schematic and actual stages that permit tensile loading, heating, or combinations thereof for disk-shaped specimens, (b) micro-electromechanical systems with integrated samples, and (c) stages for studies of indentation and compression. Based on Ref. 131.

Figure 8

FIG. 9. In-situ TEM observations of copper electrodeposited on a gold substrate. (a) The current transient during the early stages of growth, with four arrows denoting the times when the images in (b–e) were recorded. From Ref. 136. Copyright ACS, reproduced with permission.

Figure 9

FIG. 10. Series of in-situ TEM images of dislocations in iron under a constant applied load. In this series, frames (a–d) show that the dislocations move when hydrogen is introduced to the sample cell, frames (e and f) capture the cessation of motion when the gas is removed and frames (g–l) capture the motion when the gas is reintroduced. From Ref. 148. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced with permission.

Figure 10

FIG. 11. Snapshot capturing the rapid exothermic reaction between Ni-rich and Al-rich layers in a multilayer foil of Ni-Al-V in a DTEM. (a) Location where the reaction was triggered. (b) Reaction front captured during its travel. From Ref. 154. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced with permission.

Figure 11

FIG. 12. Ultrafast TEM data showing the change in the energy landscape of graphene during a laser pulse. (a) The time–energy difference landscape for times before and after the pulse (at t = 0). (b) Compression and expansion along the c-axis of the sample observed as time progresses. From Ref. 155. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced with permission.

Figure 12

FIG. 13. Example of a large set of APT data, segmented to reveal the γ/γ′ structure of a nickel-based alloy. One hundred six million atoms were collected in this sample. The white surfaces are contours at 10 at.% Al concentration. From Ref. 166. Copyright TMS. Reproduced with permission.

Figure 13

FIG. 14. (a) 3D APT elemental map of source/drain region of a n-MOSFET and (b) cross-sectional TEM image. From Ref. 170. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced with permission.

Figure 14

FIG. 15. Field evaporation histogram of events hitting the detector for an aluminum atom probe tomography (ATP) specimen. This figure illustrates homophase aberrations that occur in some materials and which are very pronounced in aluminum. The darker blue regions receive fewer ions and indicate regions on the tip apex that have facets. Image courtesy of T.F. Kelly.30

Figure 15

FIG. 16. Schematic illustration of the origins of heterophase aberrations caused by different evaporation fields, E, in the matrix E0 and the second phase, Eβ.

Figure 16

FIG. 17. Series of field-ion micrographs showing one region on a Ni-Zr intermetallic atom probe tip. Between each successive image in the sequence, a single atom was field-evaporated from the tip. After Ref. 179. Reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press.

Figure 17

FIG. 18. Example of output data from computed x-ray tomography (XRT) using a benchtop instrument. This image is a 3D reconstruction of firn (snow ice with porosity) taken from the Antarctic. The sample volume is 8 mm on each side. A reconstructed firn cube of 16 mm (400 voxels) side length from 8 m depth. The ice phase is displayed in black; pores are transparent. From Ref. 182. Reprinted from the Annals of Glaciology with permission of the International Glaciological Society.

Figure 18

FIG. 19. Example of XRT data collected at a synchrotron source, showing the structure of directionally freeze-cast titanium foams, showing pores as solid and metal as empty; the gradient direction is along the z axis. The inset shows an optical micrograph taken along the z-axis. From Ref. 192. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced with permission.

Figure 19

FIG. 20. (a) SEM image of nanoporous gold annealed at 500 °C for 30 min to coarsen pore size; (b) a tomographic reconstruction of nanoporous gold annealed at 400 °C for 30 min (imaging with transmission x-ray microscopy at the Advanced Photon Source, beamline 32-ID-C); (c) a small volume taken from (b), showing the detailed interconnected structure and (d) highlighting the zero mean curvature region, which forms a continuous network among the surface. From Ref. 203. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced with permission.

Figure 20

FIG. 21. The 3D-XRD set-up. A monochromatic high energy x-ray beam is incident on the sample. Two sets of detectors are used: Near-field detectors at position L1 and L2, which are typically 2–10 mm from the sample for full mapping of microstructures, and a far-field detector typically 40 cm from the sample for fast characterizations of sizes, orientations, and strains. Based on Ref. 17.

Figure 21

FIG. 22. Time series of images showing the growth of a nucleus during recrystallization of deformed aluminum. These images show the nonuniform growth rate of the grain (c), and the development and advancement of protrusions from different parts of the grain at different times (e and h). From Ref. 211. Copyright AAAS, reproduced with permission.

Figure 22

FIG. 23. Lattice strain distributions in 316 stainless steel obtained with 111, 200, and 220 reflections as a function of tilt angle relative to the loading direction at different number of fatigue cycles. From Ref. 233. Copyright Nature Publishing Group, reproduced with permission.

Figure 23

FIG. 24. Characteristic portion of the 3D-rendered microstructure showing the γ′ precipitates in a γ/γ′ nickel-based superalloy. Dimensions are 7.5 × 7.5 × 3.6 (10−6 m3). From Ref. 1. Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, reproduced with permission.

Figure 24

FIG. 25. Atom maps of 2–4 nm Ti-, Y-, and O-enriched nanoclusters and Cr, W, and C segregation to grain boundaries in 14YWT. Each dot in these atom maps are a single atom. From Ref. 283. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced with permission.

Figure 25

FIG. 26. Devitrification of bulk metallic glass of Zr52.5Cu17.9Ni14.6Al10Ti5. (a) Isoconcentration surfaces revealing the lenticular Zr-enriched precipitates and the internal Al-enriched core. Zr, red; Al, yellow. (b) Linear composition profiles through the center of the lenticular precipitate showing the rejection of Al from the Cr while Ti atoms are rejected from both the core and the shell. From Ref. 287.. Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, reproduced with permission.

Figure 26

FIG. 27. Orientation images showing the angular deviation from the nominal [2 9 20] orientation of the Cu crystallite before deformation. (a) Image obtained from x-ray microdiffraction, and (b) image obtained from electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD). From Ref 291. Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, reproduced with permission.

Figure 27

FIG. 28. Deformed commercial purity aluminum showing the (a) orientation image and dislocation density maps obtained from (b) 2D analysis, and (c) 3D information. The scale shown is for dislocation density for both the 2D and 3D analyses. Figure courtesy of D.P. Field.

Figure 28

FIG. 29. (a) EBSD map showing partially recrystallized grain located away from the nucleation site. Larger, darker grains are of grain boundaries with Σ7 tilt character at their mobile leading edge. (b) Secondary electron image of the specific area containing the Σ7 grain boundary. (c) EBSD inverse pole figure map of the area designated in the box in the center image. (d) Schematic diagram showing the Σ7 grain boundary (plan view) and the location of the Pt “cap” to be applied before milling. From Ref. 268. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced with permission.

Figure 29

FIG. 30. 3D auto-correlation functions for W atoms in nanocrystalline Ni-W with a grain size of ∼3 nm, taken from (a) experimental APT data and (b) atomistic simulations (simulated structure shown in the inset). Through statistical analysis of the APT data and comparison with the simulated structure, it was shown that the average W distribution over all the grain boundaries could be determined. (c) APT data from an annealed sample of somewhat larger grain size (20 nm), where an APT reconstruction artifact highlights the locations of grain boundaries, permitting a more direct measurement of the local segregation at individual boundaries. From Refs. 178, 303. Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, and Elsevier, reproduced with permission.

Figure 30

FIG. 31. Distribution of Ni and Si in HP-304, HP-304 + Si, and CP-304 irradiated to 5 dpa at 360 °C. Ni- and Si-rich clusters are indicated by arrows in HP-304-Si and CP-304. Possible denuded zones are indicated by dashed lines. Ni is shown in green and Si in gray. Figure courtesy of G. Was.

Figure 31

FIG. 32. Isosurface of (a) Ni at 45 wt% and (b) Si at 15 wt% in alloy HP-304 + Si irradiated to 5 dpa at 360 °C. The box is 40 nm × 40 nm × 70 nm. (c) Magnified image of a Ni- and Si-rich cluster in alloy HP-304 irradiated to 5 dpa at 360 °C. Figure courtesy of G. Was.

Figure 32

FIG. 33. Composition profiles of minor elements (B, P, C, and S) across a grain boundary in alloy CP-304 irradiated to 5 dpa at 360 °C as characterized by APT. Figure courtesy of G. Was.

Figure 33

FIG. 34. Comparison of the damage structure produced in Cu-Nb multilayers following implantation with (a) 150 keV He ions to a dose of 1 × 1017 cm−2 at room temperature and (b) 33 keV He ions to a dose of 1.5 × 1017 ions cm−2. From Ref. 312 Copyright JOM Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, reproduced with permission.

Figure 34

FIG. 35. Reconstructed volume showing the open crack (dark) and the oxidized twin deformation bands (light), together with one of the original slices. Sample: 304SS with 20% CW. From Ref. 319. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced with permission.

Figure 35

FIG. 36. (a) APT reconstruction showing the presence of lithium atoms within the cap and sub-interface oxides. (b) Top-view of the sub-interface region showing the distribution of oxides (cap oxide removed; only oxide species shown). The oxide regions beneath the cap are interconnected. (c) Sub-volume taken from the cap-oxide-to-metal interface showing selected species. (d) Concentration profile across the oxide–metal interface generated from the region in (c). The presence of lithium is represented by an atom-count because its concentration is very low. From Ref. 318. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced with permission.

Figure 36

FIG. 37. (a) STEM HAADF image showing the crack tip used for the tomographic reconstruction. The high dislocation density and the location of several TDBs in the bottom grain are clearly visible; (b) 3D reconstructed volume representing all relevant features. Sample 304SS with 5% CW. From Ref. 319. Copyright Elsevier, reproduced with permission.