Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ksp62 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T20:12:20.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of a moderate dose of fructose in solid foods on TAG, glucose and uric acid before and after a 1-month moderate sugar-feeding period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2020

Peter M. Clifton  and
Jennifer B. Keogh
Peter M. Clifton*
Affiliation:
UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
Jennifer B. Keogh
Affiliation:
UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Peter M. Clifton, email peter.cliftom@unisa.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are few data on the effects on TAG, glucose and uric acid of chronic consumption of a moderate dose of fructose in solid foods. Twenty-eight participants with prediabetes and/or obesity and overweight commenced the study (BMI 32·3 kg/m2, age 44·7 years, fasting glucose 5·3 (sd 0·89) mmol/l and 2-h glucose 6·6 (sd 1·8) mmol/l). Twenty-four men and women who completed the study consumed, in random order, two acute test meals of muffins sweetened with either fructose or sucrose. This was followed by 4-week chronic consumption of 42 g/d of either fructose or sucrose in low-fat muffins after which the two meal tests were repeated. The sugar type in the chronic feeding period was also randomised. Fasting TAG increased after chronic consumption of fructose by 0·31 (sd 0·37) mmol/l compared with sucrose in those participants with impaired fasting glucose (IFG)/impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (P = 0·004). Total cholesterol (0·33 mmol/l), LDL-cholesterol (0·24 mmol/l) and HDL-cholesterol (0·08 mmol/l) increased significantly over the 1- month feeding period with no differences between muffin types. Fasting glucose was not different after 1 month of muffin consumption. Uric acid response was not different between the two sugar types either baseline or 1 month, and there were no differences between baseline and 1 month. The increase in fasting TAG in participants with IFG/IGT suggests the need for caution in people at increased risk of type 2 diabetes.

Keywords

TAGUric acidGlucoseFructoseSucroseSolid foods

Information

Type
Full Papers
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 126 , Issue 6 , 28 September 2021 , pp. 837 - 843
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

In meta-analyses of prospective studies, greater weight gain and increased type 2 diabetes and CHD have been linked with the consumption of beverages containing either sucrose or high-fructose maize syrup(Reference Imamura, O’Connor and Ye1–Reference Huang, Huang and Tian3). It has been shown that fructose in sweetened beverages providing 25 % of energy requirements that induces weight gain increases serum TAG more than a similar amount of glucose over 10 weeks(Reference Stanhope, Schwarz and Keim4). In contrast, fructose did not have any disparate effects compared with other types of carbohydrate in a meta-analysis of short-term isoenergetic studies, provided weight gain did not occur(Reference Chiavaroli, de Souza and Ha5). Despite the increase in TAG, fructose intake in excess of requirements does not increase liver or muscle fat or enhance insulin resistance in liver, muscle or adipose tissue compared with glucose(Reference Le, Faeh and Stettler6,Reference Ngo Sock, Le and Ith7) . Fructose as part of a fat tolerance test(Reference Cohen and Schall8,Reference Chong, Fielding and Frayn9) or with a mixed meal increased postprandial TAG levels in some(Reference Abraha, Humphreys and Clark10–Reference Teff, Grudziak and Townsend12) but not all studies(Reference Singleton, Heiser and Jamesen13,Reference Jameel, Phang and Wood14) . Substitution of fructose for starch in type 2 diabetes lowers HbA1c and fasting glucose when the amount is low, usually <40 g/d(Reference Cozma, Sievenpiper and de Souza15). This occurs because fructose stimulates glucokinase regulatory protein-1(Reference Beck and Miller16) and increases glycogen synthesis 4-fold(Reference Petersen, Laurent and Yu17) leading to a lower glucose response in an oral glucose tolerance test to which 7·5 g fructose has been added. However, it has been observed that chronic fructose feeding in beverages for 10 weeks increases daily uric acid profiles in overweight and obese men and women compared with isoenergetic glucose feeding(Reference Cox, Stanhope and Schwarz18). The American Diabetes Association recommends that free fructose (naturally occurring in foods such as fruit) be kept below 12 % of energy to minimise TAG elevation(Reference Evert, Boucher and Cypress19). Non-energetic sweeteners are currently under scrutiny because of their association with type 2 diabetes(Reference Imamura, O’Connor and Ye1) and with enhanced glucose absorption in healthy volunteers(Reference Young, Isaacs and Schober20) so there may be a potential role for low dose fructose as a sweetener at levels that do not exceed recommendations.

There is a lack of data on the effects of fructose consumed added to solid foods at <12 % of energy. In the present study, we aimed to assess the metabolic responses to muffins containing 42 g sucrose or 42 g fructose before and after a 1-month chronic consumption period in which muffins are added to the normal diet. We aimed to see if fructose could substitute for sucrose in people with obesity and prediabetes without adverse metabolic effects. To our knowledge, no study has previously used fructose solely in a solid form and compared it with sucrose which is the most commonly used table sugar.

Materials and methods

Participants

Participants were recruited from the University of South Australia’s database of volunteers.

Selection criteria

Participants were either overweight or obese (BMI > 25 kg/m2), over 18 years and not pregnant or breast-feeding. People with impaired fasting glucose (IFG glucose > 5·5 mmol/l) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT 2-h glucose 8–11·1 mmol/l) after 75 g oral glucose tolerance testing using finger prick glucose values were included. Exclusion criteria were known type 2 diabetes, known kidney, liver or heart disease and cancer in treatment phase. Subjects on any medication were also excluded. Participants self-reported their health status.

Study plan

Participants attended the research clinic at the University of South Australia from February to June 2016 for baseline visits on two mornings 1 week apart and were randomised to consume after an 8 h fast, two muffins over a period of 15 min (muffin S – sucrose 1 week, followed by muffin F – fructose the following week or vice versa). Subjects were asked to avoid alcohol and strenuous exercise in the 24 h preceding the tests. Following the baseline tests, participants were asked to consume two low-fat muffins/d for 4 weeks before repeating the acute studies (again in random order) on two mornings 1 week apart. They were randomly allocated to consume either sucrose or fructose muffins for this month using a computerised randomisation programme by a technician not involved in measurement or analysis of results. The research personnel enrolling the participants and providing the muffins were unaware of the muffin code as were the participants.

At each of the visits, before and following the consumption of the test muffins, we took venous blood samples at regular interval (every 30 min for 180 min) and measured glucose, TAG and uric acid levels on a Konelab using standard commercial kits.

Composition of muffins

Muffins were cooked in the research kitchens at the University of South Australia. The muffins for the acute studies (before and after the chronic phase) each contained 21 g sucrose or fructose and 21 g of polyunsaturated fat while the muffins for the chronic phase contained the same amount of sugar but had a lower amount of fat at 11 g per muffin to minimise the energy load. The two muffins/d for the chronic phase represented a total of 17–25 % of daily energy intake depending on sex with the sugar at 6–8 % of energy. No instructions were given about replacement of foods with muffins and it is possible energy intake could have increased by 17–25 % for 1 month and induced measurable weight gain. No measurement of energy or sugar intake was made before or during the intervention to ensure the intervention was as free-living as possible. No food records were collected.

Ethics

The research was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of the University of South Australia (application ID 200757) and all volunteers gave written informed consent. The trial was registered by the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR www.anzctr.org.au/) ACTRN12618000125224.

Statistical analysis plan

Data shown are means and standard deviations unless stated otherwise. Data were analysed by repeated-measures ANOVA of incremental AUC (iAUC) of TAG and uric acid with type of chronic sugar as a between subject factor and weight as a covariate in a secondary analysis. Statistics were obtained for acute sugar type separately at baseline and at 1 month, and month by acute sugar in a final model which also examined the between subject factor of chronic sugar type. Data were significant if P was <0·05. No adjustment was made for multiple tests. Post hoc analysis was performed contrasting people with IFG/IGT and those without, and weight was included as a covariate in secondary analysis. The data analyst was blinded to the code for acute and chronic sugar until analysis was completed.

Power analysis

Power analysis was based on our previous publication(Reference Gallagher, Keogh and Pedersen21) and showed that twenty-four subjects were required to complete the study to detect a difference in TAG iAUC of 30 % (80 % power, P < 0·05, sd of difference 1·2 mmol/l 3 h). The primary endpoints were the contrasts between sugars for incremental TAG AUC and uric acid AUC at baseline and 1 month. Secondary endpoints were fasting TAG levels at 1 month as well as sugar, sugar by time and sugar by time by month for each individual time point value for TAG, glucose and uric acid. For the secondary endpoint, the study had enough power to detect a 35 % difference in fasting TAG between sugars with a sd of 30 %.

There was no statistical difference in characteristics between the forty eligible for the study as assessed by email questionnaires and the twenty-four who completed and whose data were analysed. Thirty-one of those invited to participate accepted the invitation and were randomised, three failed to commence and four dropped out. The characteristics of those invited to participate who declined initially (n 9) or dropped out (n 3 did not attend the first visit after randomisation, n 4 did not complete the intervention) were similar to the completers: age 56 years, BMI 31 kg/m2, fasting glucose 6·0 mmol/l and 2-h glucose 8·3 mmol/l.

Results

Forty potential participants from the University of South Australia’s database of volunteers were invited to participate. They had previously provided consent to be contacted about upcoming studies. Thirty-one volunteers accepted the invitation and were enrolled in the study, twenty-eight commenced the study and three failed to attend their first appointment. Twenty-four participants completed the study. The drop-out rate was n 4, 14 %. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram is presented in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram.

Fifteen men and thirteen women commenced the study (Table 1). Fifteen participants had IFG (>5·5 mmol/l) or IGT and three had both; ten had normal glucose tolerance and seventeen were obese. The twenty-eight participants who commenced had an average BMI of 32·3 kg/m2, age of 44·7 years, a fasting glucose of 5·3 (sd 0·89) mmol/l and a 2-h glucose of 6·6 (sd 1·8) mmol/l. There was no statistical difference between those allocated to fructose muffins and those allocated to sucrose muffins. Four dropped out after the first two acute meal studies. Seventeen people with IFG/IGT and seven with normal glucose tolerance completed the study. Weight gain over 1 month in the twenty-four (eleven fructose, thirteen sucrose) who completed this section was 0·53 kg (P = 0·2) with six of this group losing weight. Volunteers could not distinguish the type of sugar in the muffins as assessed by a questionnaire on completion of the study.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of completers

(Mean values and standard deviations; numbers of participants)

IFG, impaired fasting glucose; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; M, male; F, female.

TAG

Fasting TAG

Data were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA with month (0, 1), sugar (fructose or sucrose) and IFG/IGT (yes/no) as factors. There was a strong interaction between IFG/IGT and month (P = 0·001) and a weak interaction between month and chronic sugar (P = 0·036) with higher values seen in the IFG/IGT group. Analysing only those with IFG/IGT (n 17), there was a strong effect of month (P < 0·001) with an increase from month 0 to month 1 and an interaction between month and chronic sugar (P = 0·004) with increases at month 1 seen with fructose. Change in weight over the month was a significant covariate (P = 0·014), but the effect of weight gain was seen only in those with IFG/IGT (an increase of 0·8 kg) where there was no difference seen between the chronic sugars. There was no effect seen in those without IFG/IGT (n 8).

Incremental AUC TAG

Following the acute meal tests, there was no difference between fructose and sucrose-containing muffins in TAG iAUC with an increase in TAG from 1·46 mmol/l at baseline to 2·53 mmol/l at 180 min after fructose and an increase from 1·43 to 2·25 mmol/l at 180 min after sucrose (P = 0·14 for iAUC TAG). There was a time by sugar interaction with a slightly delayed response after fructose with a peak at 180 min while after sucrose it was higher from 30 min onwards with a peak at 150 min followed by a slight fall at 180 min (P < 0·001 time by sugar) (Fig. 2). Average TAG over 3 h was 1·83 mmol/l after fructose and 1·89 mmol/l after sucrose (NS).

Fig. 2.

Effect of acute feeding of fructose and glucose on serum TAG before (1) and after (2) 4 weeks of 42 g/d of sugar. Analysed by repeated-measures ANOVA of incremental AUC with acute sugar and month as repeated measures and chronic sugar as a between-subject factor. Fructose 1 and sucrose 1: (P = 0·14). Fructose 2 and sucrose 2: (P = 0·5). Overall P = 0·3 for acute sugar, P = 0·2 for acute sugar by month, P = 0·5 for acute sugar by month by chronic sugar. n 24 for each line. Data are mean values with their standard errors of the mean. , Sucrose 1; , sucrose 2; , fructose 1; , fructose 2.

These acute tests were repeated after 1 month of consumption of muffins containing either sucrose or fructose, and iAUC TAG was not different between the sugars (P = 0·5). The same pattern was seen with fructose increasing from 1·55 to 2·71 mmol/l (mean 1·97 mmol/l) and sucrose increasing from 1·58 to 2·49 mmol/l (mean 2·02 mmol/l).

The iAUC TAG was not different between the two sugar types at either month 0 or month 1 or both together (P = 0·3). There was no difference in overall iAUC TAG between month 0 and month 1 (P = 0·5) nor did chronic sugar type have an effect (P = 0·5). People consuming sucrose muffins for a month had an overall mean TAG of 2·0 mmol/l (across all time points) at month 0 and 1·99 at month 1. With the fructose chronic muffins, overall TAG was 1·70 mmol/l at month 0 and 1·87 mmol/l at month 1 (NS).

For the secondary endpoint of fasting TAG overall there was no significant effect of chronic sugar. However, when IFG/IGT was added as a factor a strong interaction with month (P = 0·001) was present. Analysing only those with IFG/IGT (n 17), there was a strong effect of month (P < 0·001) and an interaction between month and chronic sugar (P = 0·004). Fasting TAG was 1·51 and 1·59 mmol/l for chronic sucrose and 1·55 and 1·95 mmol/l for chronic fructose at month 0 and month 1, respectively (Table 2). The difference in this group in the effect of chronic sugar was an increase over the month of 0·40 (sd 0·21) mmol/l for fructose and 0·09 (sd 0·17) mmol/l for sucrose with a difference between the two sugars of 0·31 (sd 0·37) mmol/l (95 % CI 0·11, 0·51). Change in weight over a month was a significant covariate (P = 0·014). However, weight gain was seen only in those with IFG/IGT (an increase of 0·8 kg). There was no significant difference in weight gain between the chronic sugars. There was no effect of weight seen in those without IFG/IGT (n 8).

Table 2.

Fasting TAG and weight before and after 4 weeks of muffin consumption

(Mean values and standard deviations)

IFG, impaired fasting glucose; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance.

Total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, uric acid and glucose

Total cholesterol (0·33 mmol/l), LDL-cholesterol (0·24 mmol/l) and HDL-cholesterol (0·08 mmol/l) increased significantly over the 1-month feeding period with no differences between muffin types.

Uric acid decreased after each muffin acutely (P < 0·001) and iAUC was not different between the two sugar types (P = 0·9) at either baseline or 1 month with no differences between baseline and 1 month (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Effect of acute feeding of fructose and glucose on serum uric acid before and after 4 weeks of 42 g/d of sugar. Analysed by repeated-measures ANOVA of incremental AUC with acute sugar and month as repeated measures and chronic sugar as a between-subject factor. No effect of acute sugar or acute sugar by month (P = 0·6–0·9). Interaction between acute sugar, month and chronic sugar feeding (P = 0·09). n 24 for each line. Data are mean values with their standard errors of the mean. , Sucrose 1; , Sucrose 2; , fructose 1; , fructose 2.

Glucose profiles as expected were quite different between the two muffin types with a time by sugar P value of P < 0·001 for iAUC over 180 min (Fig. 4). The mean difference in glucose was 0·41 mmol/l. Blood glucose increased from 5·5 to 5·9 mmol/l after fructose muffins and from 5·6 to 6·8 mmol/l after sucrose muffins. On repeat testing after 1 month of muffin consumption, glucose after fructose muffins increased from 5·5 to 6·4 mmol/l and from 5·5 to 6·6 mmol/l after sucrose muffins with an overall significance between sugars of P < 0·001 (iAUC over 180 min) with no significant difference between the baseline and 1-month tests (P = 0·14). Fasting glucose was not different after 1 month of muffin consumption.

Fig. 4.

Effect of acute feeding of fructose and glucose on plasma glucose before and after 4 weeks of 42 g/d of sugar. Analysed by repeated-measures ANOVA with acute sugar, time and month as repeated measures and chronic sugar as a between-subject factor. Fructose 1 and sucrose 1. P < 0·001 for main effect of sugar. P < 0·001 for time by sugar. Fructose 2 and sucrose 2. Main effect of sugar P = 0·001, time by sugar P = 0·007. No effect of chronic sugar feeding (P = 0·5). Overall time by sugar P < 0·001. n 24 for each line. Data are mean values with their standard errors of the mean. , Sucrose 1; , sucrose 2; , fructose 1; , fructose 2.

Discussion

Overall, there was no difference in iAUC TAG or uric acid between the two sugar types at baseline or after 1 month of sugar feeding regardless of the sugar fed chronically. One important finding of the present study was that fasting TAG increased after chronic consumption of 42 g fructose by 0·31 (sd 0·37) mmol/l compared with sucrose in those participants with IFG/IGT (P = 0·004). Overall, in this group of overweight/obese individuals, this amount of fructose as part of solid food containing fat, starch and protein had no effect on postprandial plasma TAG over 3 h compared with sucrose. Fructose led to a lower glucose level compared with the sucrose-sweetened muffin meal. This may have advantages in this population at risk of progression to diabetes by minimising the demand for insulin, but the adverse effects on fasting TAG in high-risk individuals need to be borne in mind. These results differ dramatically from acute studies of fructose in liquids containing sugar and fat only with no protein or fibre(Reference Cohen and Schall8,Reference Chong, Fielding and Frayn9) . One study(Reference Chong, Fielding and Frayn9) in lean healthy subjects showed that fructose fed at 0·75 g/kg combined with fat at 0·5 g/kg in beverage form but with no starch or protein increased postprandial TAG with a maximum difference of 0·8 mmol/l at both 300 and 360 min compared with the glucose meal. The fat load in the current study was much lower at an average of 0·22 g/kg (varying from 0·18 to 0·28) but this represents a much more normal fat load. In agreement with our study, Singleton et al. (Reference Singleton, Heiser and Jamesen13) found that there was no difference between glucose and fructose in the TAG response to a fat load compared with no added sugar.

When a sugar-containing beverage is consumed with a solid meal, fructose augments plasma TAG compared with glucose(Reference Abraha, Humphreys and Clark10,Reference Teff, Elliott and Tschop11) . Teff et al.(Reference Teff, Elliott and Tschop11) compared the effects of a high fructose or a high glucose beverage added to meals over 24 h in twelve normal weight women. With 130 g/d of fructose, serum TAG increased by 30–60 % compared with glucose at the same time point with a 35 % increase in fasting TAG the next day. Similar but greater effects were seen in overweight men and women(Reference Teff, Grudziak and Townsend12). These intakes of fructose are very large and represent a hyperenergetic state. Previously, we performed a study in healthy lean subjects examining 55 g of fructose in solid muffins containing protein and fat and found no difference between fructose and sucrose or sucralose in TAG levels over 5 h(Reference Gallagher, Keogh and Pedersen21). Both glucose and insulin levels were lower with fructose. In the present study despite the presence of prediabetes or obesity, there was still no difference between fructose and sucrose muffins on postprandial TAG levels up to 3 h and glucose was lower as expected with the fructose muffin. These data are very similar to a recent meta-analysis(Reference Evans, Frese and Romero22). It is possible greater effects could be seen on TAG levels after 5 h.

In the present study, participants consumed two muffins/d containing 42 g of fructose or sucrose for 1 month and then the acute tests were repeated. Fasting TAG and glucose overall were not altered by a month of muffin consumption, and the repeat acute response was the same as the first one regardless of chronic muffin type. However, in people with IFG/IGT fasting TAG at 1 month was increased with a moderate difference between sucrose muffins and fructose muffins of 0·36 mmol/l, but numbers were small in each group. Body weight increased non-significantly by 0·5 kg which is similar to the Stanhope study(Reference Stanhope, Schwarz and Keim4) in which a weight gain of 1·8 kg for the glucose group and 1·4 kg for the fructose group was seen after 10 weeks with a larger daily sugar load. However, in the IFG/IGT group body weight increased significantly by 0·8 kg with no differences between chronic sugar types. The postprandial TAG peak in the Stanhope study(Reference Stanhope, Schwarz and Keim4) was 1·5–2 times greater with fructose than with glucose as was fasting apoB and fasting LDL. However, fasting TAG increased only after glucose and not after fructose which contrasts with our study and is difficult to explain and is in contrast to their previous 24 h studies. Fasting glucose and insulin increased 4-fold from baseline with fructose compared with glucose while AUC glucose and insulin in the oral glucose tolerance test doubled, consistent with increased insulin resistance. In our study, we saw no changes in fasting glucose, suggesting no changes in insulin resistance with this amount of fructose chronically although a meta-analysis suggested small doses of fructose could lower fasting glucose(Reference Evert, Boucher and Cypress19); a more recent meta-analysis of eleven chronic studies (2–10 weeks) with fourteen treatment arms found no differences in fasting glucose overall or with fructose substituted for sucrose(Reference Evans, Frese and Romero23). Our results in people with IFG/IGT who experienced weight gain with chronic muffin feeding partially agree with the systematic review and meta-analysis of Chiavaroli et al.(Reference Chiavaroli, de Souza and Ha5) who found fructose only had adverse effects on lipids when fed at an energy level of 21–35 % with energy in excess of requirements. Isoenergetic substitution of glucose with fructose in chronic studies has no effect on fasting TAG while substitution for sucrose lowers fasting TAG but there were only three studies in this latter group. Overall, TAG was lowered by 0·08 mmol/l(Reference Evans, Frese and Romero22) while in isoenergetic acute studies fructose was not different to other carbohydrates in its effect on postprandial TAG(Reference Evans, Frese and Romero22); although in studies that follow TAG levels over 24 h, the level tends to increase with fructose later in the day. Overall, the most important determinant of the responses to fructose is whether it is fed in excess to energetic requirements which is more likely with very large amounts fed in an easy to consume liquid form.

Teff et al. (Reference Teff, Grudziak and Townsend12) found no effect of either glucose or fructose containing drinks with food on uric acid over 23 h in obese men and women, while Cai et al. (Reference Cai, Li and Shi24) found that 75 g of fructose alone increased uric acid over 3 h compared with glucose. Le et al. (Reference Le, Frye and Rivard25) demonstrated a similar effect with 70 g of high fructose maize syrup over 6 h as did Stanhope et al. (Reference Stanhope, Medici and Bremer26) over 24 h with beverages contributing 17·5 and 25 % of energy as fructose fed for 2 weeks. In the present study, beverages contributing only 10 % of energy elevated postprandial TAG, while the two higher doses increased fasting LDL-cholesterol, apoB, non-HDL cholesterol. Fasting uric acid was increased only if fed in a 35 % of energy excess(Reference Wang, Sievenpiper and de Souza27) although this article has been criticised(Reference Stanhope28).

Conclusions

Compared with sucrose, fructose at a moderate intake of approximately 6–8 % of energy as part of a solid meal has no adverse effects nor any beneficial effects on postprandial TAG and uric acid over 3 h at baseline or after a 4-week feeding period in which no overall weight gain occurred. People with IFG/IGT have a moderate increase in fasting TAG after 1 month of eating fructose muffins and gaining weight but this needs confirmation with larger numbers, but caution in using this amount of fructose chronically is required in this particular group of high-risk individuals.

Limitations

Limitations of the present study are that we did not extend our acute studies to 5–6 h as differences may have appeared later and we did not compare fructose in solid foods to fructose in liquid form, nor did we perform acute meal tests without sugars. We did not control or assess background dietary intake which may have been differentially altered by the two muffin types by chance alone. The conclusions of the present study are limited to a moderate intake of fructose and may not apply to much larger amounts for longer periods of time.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Kirsty Turner, Fiona Quigley and Elaine Murphy for their assistance with the study.

This research received no external funding. Peter Clifton was supported by a Principal National Health and Medical Research Fellowship. There were no external funders other than the NH&MRC Research Fellowship. Internal funding was provided by the University of South Australia who played no role in the research design and analysis.

P C. designed the research, analysed the data and wrote paper and has primary responsibility for the final content. J. K. contributed to the design and critically reviewed the paper.

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

Imamura, F, O’Connor, L, Ye, Z, et al. (2015) Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. BMJ 351, h3576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malik, VS, Pan, A, Willett, WC, et al. (2013) Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 98, 1084–1102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, C, Huang, J, Tian, Y, et al. (2014) Sugar sweetened beverages consumption and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Atherosclerosis 234, 11–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanhope, KL, Schwarz, JM, Keim, NL, et al. (2009) Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans. J Clin Invest 119, 1322–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiavaroli, L, de Souza, RJ, Ha, V, et al. (2015) Effect of fructose on established lipid targets: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. J Am Heart Assoc 4, e001700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le, KA, Faeh, D, Stettler, R, et al. (2006) A 4-wk high-fructose diet alters lipid metabolism without affecting insulin sensitivity or ectopic lipids in healthy humans. Am J Clin Nutr 84, 1374–1379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ngo Sock, ET, Le, KA, Ith, M, et al. (2010) Effects of a short-term overfeeding with fructose or glucose in healthy young males. Br J Nutr 103, 939–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, JC & Schall, R (1988) Reassessing the effects of simple carbohydrates on the serum triglyceride responses to fat meals. Am J Clin Nutr 48, 1031–1034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chong, MF, Fielding, BA & Frayn, KN (2007) Mechanisms for the acute effect of fructose on postprandial lipemia. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 1511–1520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abraha, A, Humphreys, SM, Clark, ML, et al. (1998) Acute effect of fructose on postprandial lipaemia in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Br J Nutr 80, 169–175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teff, KL, Elliott, SS, Tschop, M, et al. (2004) Dietary fructose reduces circulating insulin and leptin, attenuates postprandial suppression of ghrelin, and increases triglycerides in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89, 2963–2972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teff, KL, Grudziak, J, Townsend, RR, et al. (2009) Endocrine and metabolic effects of consuming fructose- and glucose-sweetened beverages with meals in obese men and women: influence of insulin resistance on plasma triglyceride responses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94, 1562–1569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singleton, MJ, Heiser, C, Jamesen, K, et al. (1999) Sweetener augmentation of serum triacylglycerol during a fat challenge test in humans. J Am Coll Nutr 18, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jameel, F, Phang, M, Wood, LG, et al. (2014) Acute effects of feeding fructose, glucose and sucrose on blood lipid levels and systemic inflammation. Lipids Health Dis 13, 195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cozma, AI, Sievenpiper, JL, de Souza, RJ, et al. (2012) Effect of fructose on glycemic control in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. Diabetes Care 35, 1611–1620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, T & Miller, BG (2013) Structural basis for regulation of human glucokinase by glucokinase regulatory protein. Biochemistry 52, 6232–6239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, KF, Laurent, D, Yu, C, et al. (2001) Stimulating effects of low-dose fructose on insulin-stimulated hepatic glycogen synthesis in humans. Diabetes 50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, CL, Stanhope, KL, Schwarz, JM, et al. (2012) Consumption of fructose- but not glucose-sweetened beverages for 10 weeks increases circulating concentrations of uric acid, retinol binding protein-4, and gamma-glutamyl transferase activity in overweight/obese humans. Nutr Metab (Lond) 9, 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evert, AB, Boucher, JL, Cypress, M, et al. (2013) Nutrition therapy recommendations for the management of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 36, 3821–3842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, RL, Isaacs, NJ, Schober, G, et al. (2017) Impact of artificial sweeteners on glycaemic control in healthy humans. Abstract from the European Association for the Study of Diabetes Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
Gallagher, C, Keogh, JB, Pedersen, E, et al. (2016) Fructose acute effects on glucose, insulin, and triglyceride after a solid meal compared with sucralose and sucrose in a randomized crossover study. Am J Clin Nutr 103, 1453–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, RA, Frese, M, Romero, J, et al. (2017) Fructose replacement of glucose or sucrose in food or beverages lowers postprandial glucose and insulin without raising triglycerides: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 106, 506–518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, RA, Frese, M, Romero, J, et al. (2017) Chronic fructose substitution for glucose or sucrose in food or beverages has little effect on fasting blood glucose, insulin, or triglycerides: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 106, 519–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cai, W, Li, J, Shi, J, et al. (2018) Acute metabolic and endocrine responses induced by glucose and fructose in healthy young subjects: a double-blinded, randomized, crossover trial. Clin Nutr 37, 459–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, MT, Frye, RF, Rivard, CJ, et al. (2012) Effects of high-fructose corn syrup and sucrose on the pharmacokinetics of fructose and acute metabolic and hemodynamic responses in healthy subjects. Metabolism 61, 641–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanhope, KL, Medici, V, Bremer, AA, et al. (2015) A dose-response study of consuming high-fructose corn syrup-sweetened beverages on lipid/lipoprotein risk factors for cardiovascular disease in young adults. Am J Clin Nutr 101, 1144–1154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, DD, Sievenpiper, JL, de Souza, RJ, et al. (2012) The effects of fructose intake on serum uric acid vary among controlled dietary trials. J Nutr 142, 916–923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanhope, KL (2016) Sugar consumption, metabolic disease and obesity: the state of the controversy. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 53, 52–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram.

Figure 1

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of completers(Mean values and standard deviations; numbers of participants)

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Effect of acute feeding of fructose and glucose on serum TAG before (1) and after (2) 4 weeks of 42 g/d of sugar. Analysed by repeated-measures ANOVA of incremental AUC with acute sugar and month as repeated measures and chronic sugar as a between-subject factor. Fructose 1 and sucrose 1: (P = 0·14). Fructose 2 and sucrose 2: (P = 0·5). Overall P = 0·3 for acute sugar, P = 0·2 for acute sugar by month, P = 0·5 for acute sugar by month by chronic sugar. n 24 for each line. Data are mean values with their standard errors of the mean. , Sucrose 1; , sucrose 2; , fructose 1; , fructose 2.

Figure 3

Table 2. Fasting TAG and weight before and after 4 weeks of muffin consumption(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Effect of acute feeding of fructose and glucose on serum uric acid before and after 4 weeks of 42 g/d of sugar. Analysed by repeated-measures ANOVA of incremental AUC with acute sugar and month as repeated measures and chronic sugar as a between-subject factor. No effect of acute sugar or acute sugar by month (P = 0·6–0·9). Interaction between acute sugar, month and chronic sugar feeding (P = 0·09). n 24 for each line. Data are mean values with their standard errors of the mean. , Sucrose 1; , Sucrose 2; , fructose 1; , fructose 2.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Effect of acute feeding of fructose and glucose on plasma glucose before and after 4 weeks of 42 g/d of sugar. Analysed by repeated-measures ANOVA with acute sugar, time and month as repeated measures and chronic sugar as a between-subject factor. Fructose 1 and sucrose 1. P < 0·001 for main effect of sugar. P < 0·001 for time by sugar. Fructose 2 and sucrose 2. Main effect of sugar P = 0·001, time by sugar P = 0·007. No effect of chronic sugar feeding (P = 0·5). Overall time by sugar P < 0·001. n 24 for each line. Data are mean values with their standard errors of the mean. , Sucrose 1; , sucrose 2; , fructose 1; , fructose 2.