Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-76mfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T12:52:47.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contrasting the use of space in post-Roman Exeter: geoarchaeology of dark earth and medieval deposits below Exeter Cathedral

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2022

Richard I. Macphail*
Affiliation:
UCL Institute of Archaeology, London, UK
Chris J. Carey
Affiliation:
School of Applied Sciences, University of Brighton, UK
John P. Allan
Affiliation:
Exeter Cathedral, Exeter, UK
*
*Author for correspondence ✉ r.macphail@ucl.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

European urban dark earth investigations have aided our understanding of Late Roman and early medieval populations and their activities. Deposits from two locations below Exeter Cathedral were compared in a geoarchaeological study and contrasting uses of space were identified. This supports the need for case-by-case investigations of urban deposits.

Information

Type
Project Gallery
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Antiquity Publications Ltd.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location map of the East Cloister Walk and Chapter House, Exeter Cathedral. The Roman sea port of Topsham is located 7km downstream (figure by J. Allan).

Figure 1

Figure 2. a) Sondage revealing a Roman mortar floor in the East Cloister Walk, Exeter Cathedral; sampling tins M1 (2029/2034), M2 (2033/2029), M3 (M3A, M3B and M3C; 2008) and M4 (2007/2008) are visible in the section; b) Chapter House profile: sampling through Roman, dark earth (thin sections M4A-B) and medieval (Med) levels. Sample M1 is in a possible grave cut (Gr?) (figure by R. Macphail).

Figure 2

Figure 3. a) Cloisters profile: photomicrograph of M3C (dark earth 2008 lower); midden waste includes heated fish bone (FB) and amorphous coprolitic material (Cop); plane polarised light (PPL), frame height is approximately 4.62mm; b) as 3a, under oblique incident light (OIL); note fish bone appears to be calcined; c) as 3b, amorphous (phosphatic) coprolite (autofluorescent under blue light), with void pattern and colours suggesting that it is probably a dog coprolite (EDS = 8.29–32.8% calcium, 4.32–9.54% phosphorus); PPL, frame height is approximately 2.38mm; d) photomicrograph of M3A (dark earth 2008 upper); weathered, probable coprolitic fish bone (bone is only weakly autofluorescent under blue light; EDS = 25.6–34.2% calcium, 11.9–15.3% phosphorus; n = 5); PPL, frame width is ~4.62mm; e) Chapter House profile; photomicrograph of ECCH-4B (dark earth); dark earth includes fish bone; PPL, frame width is approximately 2.38mm (figure by R. Macphail).

Figure 3

Figure 4. a) Chapter House profile: photomicrograph of ECCH-4B (dark earth); artisan working—‘rusty’ iron-working fragment (EDS = max ~95% iron oxide (FeO)); oblique incident light (OIL); frame width is ~4.62mm; b) non-ferrous metal alloy fragment; plane polarised light, frame width is ~2.38 mm; c) as 4b, under OIL; d) as 4b; X-ray backscatter image of copper-(tin)-lead alloy; EDS = 1.10–18.8% copper, 1.13–2.76% tin, 10.3–50.6% lead (n = 4 areas) (figure by R. Macphail).

Figure 4

Figure 5. Chapter House profile. Industrial heavy metals and elements: nickel (Ni), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), arsenic (As), tin (Sn) and lead (Pb) (mg/kg). Concentrations of these heavy metals suggest artisan working (e.g. tin and lead) in the dark earth, while increased lead and zinc, especially, characterise the garden and suspected inhumations soils (figure by C. Carey and R. Macphail).

Figure 5

Figure 6. Comparison of Cloisters (CL) and Chapter House (CH) profiles–LOI (organic matter) and phosphorus. Chapter House medieval soils show a particularly high organic matter and phosphorus content compared with the Cloisters profile (figure by C. Carey and R. Macphail).