Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-5vn5w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-24T15:36:52.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative proteomics of three Giardia lamblia strains: investigation of antigenic variation in the post-genomic era

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2020

Joachim Müller*
Affiliation:
Vetsuisse Faculty, Institute of Parasitology, University of Bern, Länggass-Strasse 122, CH-3012Bern, Switzerland
Sophie Braga
Affiliation:
Proteomics & Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, Department for BioMedical Research (DBMR), University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 15, CH-3010Bern, Switzerland
Anne-Christine Uldry
Affiliation:
Proteomics & Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, Department for BioMedical Research (DBMR), University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 15, CH-3010Bern, Switzerland
Manfred Heller
Affiliation:
Proteomics & Mass Spectrometry Core Facility, Department for BioMedical Research (DBMR), University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 15, CH-3010Bern, Switzerland
Norbert Müller*
Affiliation:
Vetsuisse Faculty, Institute of Parasitology, University of Bern, Länggass-Strasse 122, CH-3012Bern, Switzerland
*
Author for correspondence: Joachim Müller, E-mail: joachim.mueller@vetsuisse.unibe.ch
Author for correspondence: Joachim Müller, E-mail: joachim.mueller@vetsuisse.unibe.ch

Abstract

Giardia lamblia is a causative agent of persistent diarrhoea widespread in regions with low hygienic standards. Laboratory research is based on cloned lines issuing from various patient isolates typed in the late 1980s and 90s using restriction analysis and serology. In the present study, we compared the well-characterized strain WBC6 with another clone of the parent WB isolate termed WBA1 and with a clone from another isolate, GS/M-83-H7, using shotgun mass spectrometry proteomics. We identified 398 proteins differentially expressed between the GS and both WB isolates and 97 proteins differentially expressed between the two WB isolates. We investigated the expression levels of the predominant variant-specific surface proteins (VSPs) in each clone and matched the previously described major VSPs of each strain to the corresponding open reading frame sequences identified by whole-genome sequencing efforts. Furthermore, since the original WB isolate comes from a patient treated with metronidazole, we compared the susceptibilities of the strains to nitro compounds, as well the expression levels of enzymes involved in nitro reduction and on the corresponding enzyme activities and found distinct differences between the three strains.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Principal component analysis of proteome dataset from G. lamblia trophozoites of different strains. Trophozoites of the strains WBC6 (C6), WBA1 (A1) and GS/M-83-H7 (H7) were compared by MS shotgun analysis as described in ‘Materials and methods’ section. For each strain, all technical and biological (square, circle, diamond) replicates are shown.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Venn diagram detailing the number of differentially expressed proteins in G. lamblia trophozoites of different strains. Trophozoites of the strains WBC6 (C6), WBA1 (A1) and GS/M-83-H7 (H7) were subjected to MS shotgun analysis as described in ‘Materials and methods’ section. Orthologues present in both A and B strains have been subtracted using the GenesbyOrthologues function implemented in the GiardiaDB.

Figure 2

Table 1. Number of differentially expressed proteins in strain GS/M-83-H7 as compared to both WBC6 and WBA1 trophozoites

Figure 3

Table 2. Overview of ORFs differentially expressed in WBC6 (C6) as compared to WBA1 (A1) trophozoites

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Quantitative assessments of the major variant-specific surface proteins (VSPs). Trophozoites of the strains WBC6 (C6), WBA1 (A1) and GS/M-83-H7 (H7) were subjected to MS shotgun analysis as described in ‘Materials and methods’ section. For all VSPs, mean values ± one standard deviation for LFQ intensities (×106) in three biological replicates are shown. The VSPs are termed by their respective accession numbers in the GiardiaDB (GL50803 for C6 and A1; GSB for H7). A, VSP pattern of strain C6; B, VSP pattern of strain A1; C, VSP pattern of strain H7.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Determination of drug susceptibilities. The strains WBC6 (C6), WBA1 (A1) and GS/M-83-H7 (H7) were exposed to serial dilutions of the nitro compounds metronidazole (MET) and nitazoxanide (NTZ), as well as of albendazole (ALB). IC50 values were determined as described in ‘Materials and methods’ section and are given in μm (MET, NTZ) or nm (ALB). Diamonds correspond to the IC50s, bars to the 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 6

Table 3. Determination of minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs)

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Reductase activities in crude extracts of G. lamblia trophozoites. The assays were performed as described in ‘Materials and methods’ section using either NADH (white bars) or NADPH (black bars) as cofactors. A, NAD(P)H oxidase; B, quinone reductase with menadione as a substrate; C, nitroreductase with 7-nitrocoumarin as a substrate. Mean values ± one standard deviation for three independent assays are given. Values superscribed by different letters are significantly different (two-sided t-tests; P < 0.05).

Figure 8

Table 4. Overview of proteins involved in reduction (and thus activation) of nitro compounds and the scavenging of radicals in trophozoites of the strains WBC6 (C6), WBA1 (A1) and GS/M-83-H7 (H7)

Supplementary material: File

Müller et al. supplementary material

Müller et al. supplementary material 1

Download Müller et al. supplementary material(File)
File 5.3 MB
Supplementary material: File

Müller et al. supplementary material

Müller et al. supplementary material 2

Download Müller et al. supplementary material(File)
File 5.3 MB
Supplementary material: File

Müller et al. supplementary material

Müller et al. supplementary material 3

Download Müller et al. supplementary material(File)
File 108.3 KB