Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g4pgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T09:30:00.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Snow-accumulation distribution in the interior of the LambertGlacier basin, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Martin Higham
Affiliation:
Antarctic CRC and Australian Antarctic Division GPO Box 252–80, Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Australia
Mike Craven
Affiliation:
Antarctic CRC and Australian Antarctic Division GPO Box 252–80, Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Australia
Andrew Ruddell
Affiliation:
Antarctic CRC and Australian Antarctic Division GPO Box 252–80, Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Australia
Ian Allison
Affiliation:
Antarctic CRC and Australian Antarctic Division GPO Box 252–80, Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A prime input variable to uncoupled ice-sheet models, or for estimating themass budget of present-day ice sheets, is the distribution of net surfacemass balance. In most eases this is extrapolated from relatively few directmeasurements over a limited time period, and parameterised in terms ofcontinentality, surface elevation and other broad-scale indicators. Between1989 and 1995 a series of oversnow traverses around the interior of theLambert Glacier basin gathered a comprehensive set of data on snowaccumulation and surface properties, surface climatology, ice-sheetvelocities, elevations and thicknesses. Above the 2000 m level accumulationaverages were found to be 76 kg ma−2a−1 (σ = 74), much lower than at similar elevations inWilkes Land. The traverse route contains three distinct accumulationregimes: a relatively high accumulation zone along the western side despitehigher average elevations, a very low accumulation zone in the south due tothe effect of inereased continentality and an eastern sector that exhibits arain-shadow effect in predominantly easterly wind fields. Inter-annualvariability is high- with 1993 a colder year, recording only half the longerterm average accumulation over the portion of the route that wasmeasured.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1997
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the Lambert Glacier basin (Antarctic location inset) and LARGE operational area 1989–95, showing AWS (open circles), main traverse route and stations (dark circle), offset lines (triangle) and short western route (diamonds).

Figure 1

Table 1. Periods of accumulation data over portions of the traverse route

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Surfacee elevations (mst) along the traverse route (top), including the first 500 km of western offset line, plotted against 1994 accumulation figures (middle) and the coefficient of variation (bottom). The large peak around 130 km has a value of 6.4, due to the very low accumulation near the break in coastal slope.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Elevation scattergrams for the accumulation regimes in the Lambert basin (top). The eastern sector (circles) shows no dependence on elevation. The 10m firn temperatures vs elevation plots (bottom) depict lapse rates that are slightly Superadiabatic for the eastern and western (triangles) sectors.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Inter-annual variability from LGB00 to LGB16 shown in terms of percentage residuals for individual periods (bottom) from the 1990–945 year mean (top).

Figure 5

Table 2. Caue farms. (n = number of canes, = mean annual accumulation in kg m−2 a−1, σ = standard deviation and numbers in the bottom row are overall averages)

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Distribution of microrelief around the traverse route depicting a high predominance of reshuffled surface types, particularly for the western sector, with strong glazing evident near LGB35 along the southernmost portion of the route.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Sastrugi orientation, wind interpolated from six AWS sites and fall-line Calculated from a preliminary DEM (personal communication Jivmfrom H. Phillips) for the basin. Note the sharp change in fall-line direction from LGB00-05 down the sleep coastal slope, to LGB06 over the ridge where flow into the basin proper commences.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. New accumulation distribution for the Lambert Glacier basin. The isolated 50 kgm−2 a−1 isolated at 76° S is interpreted to match observed wind-glazed surfaces in the vicinity of LGB35.