Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-rxg44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T06:31:39.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recent fluctuations of the Dry Valleys glaciers, McMurdo Sound, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

T.J. Chinn*
Affiliation:
Alpine and Polar Processes Consultancy, c/o Crown Research, Privale Bag 1930. Dunedin, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The state of equilibrium of the frontal positions of the glaciers of the Dry Valleys area of McMurdo Sound, Antarctica, has heen a subject of speculation since the) were fu si seen. A programme to measure the changes in frontal positions of 12 ice-cliffed glaciers has been maintained since 1982-83, with a 30 year record for Mcscrve Glacier. Simple taped distances from fixed points to the fronts of the glaciers have demonstrated that, in proportion to their flow and ablation regimes which are two orders of magnitude slower than those of temperate glaciers, the glaciers are fluctuating as dynamically as do temperate glaciers. Maximum advance or recession rates have been found to be near ±1 m a−1 , changes which are almost undetectable in comparative photographs. Recession was found to be the dominant change trend, with yearly variations reflecting changes in annual ablation.

The total height of the ice cliff gives a ready estimation of glacier equilibrium, with cliff heights being greatest on advancing glaciers. The division between advancing and receding glaciers was found to be at a cliff height of about 25 m.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1998
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Measurements taken at the ice-cliff margins. X, γ, cairns; A, lower edge of apron: B, apron-top-cliff-face junction; C, cliff top.

Figure 1

Table 1. Changes in position of margins of Dry Valleys glaciers

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Measured fluctuations at individual glaciers, (a) Victoria Upper Glacier at front; (b) Victoria Lower Glacier at northwest corner; (c) Wright Upper Glacier at A, southeast corner; (d) Wright Upper Glacier at B, centre.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Measured fluctuations at individual glaciers, (a) Heimdall Glacierat side; (b) Bartley Glacier at front; (c) Meserve Glacier at MP1, east side; (d) Meserve Glacier at MP11, front; (e) Hart Glacier at front; (f) Goodspeed G lacier at front; (g) Clark Glacier at CP1, front; (h) Clark Glacier at CP11, southeast corner; (i) Wright Lower Glacier at Onyx River, north margin; (j) Wright Lower Glacier at southwest corner; (k) Adams Glacier at front; (l) Miers Glacier at front.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Fluctuations of Meserve Glacier at hut {MES at HUT).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Mean fluctuation trends of glacier margin positions for allyears recorded.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Percentage of the total of measured glaciers advancing, receding and stationary eachyear. 1993 data for 2 year period; 1996 data for 3 year period.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Relationship between mean annual fluctuations and total cliff height.