Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T00:45:55.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthetic biology for fibers, adhesives, and active camouflage materials in protection and aerospace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2019

Aled D. Roberts
Affiliation:
Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester Synthetic Biology Research Centre SYBIOCHEM, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK Bio-Active Materials Group, School of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
William Finnigan
Affiliation:
Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester Synthetic Biology Research Centre SYBIOCHEM, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK
Emmanuel Wolde-Michael
Affiliation:
Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester Synthetic Biology Research Centre SYBIOCHEM, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK
Paul Kelly
Affiliation:
Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester Synthetic Biology Research Centre SYBIOCHEM, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK
Jonny J. Blaker
Affiliation:
Bio-Active Materials Group, School of Materials, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Sam Hay
Affiliation:
Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester Synthetic Biology Research Centre SYBIOCHEM, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK
Rainer Breitling
Affiliation:
Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester Synthetic Biology Research Centre SYBIOCHEM, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK
Eriko Takano
Affiliation:
Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester Synthetic Biology Research Centre SYBIOCHEM, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK
Nigel S. Scrutton*
Affiliation:
Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester Synthetic Biology Research Centre SYBIOCHEM, School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, UK
*
Address all correspondence to Nigel Scrutton at Nigel.Scrutton@manchester.ac.uk

Abstract

Synthetic biology has a huge potential to produce the next generation of advanced materials by accessing previously unreachable (bio)chemical space. In this prospective review, we take a snapshot of current activity in this rapidly developing area, focusing on prominent examples for high-performance applications such as those required for protective materials and the aerospace sector. The continued growth of this emerging field will be facilitated by the convergence of expertise from a range of diverse disciplines, including molecular biology, polymer chemistry, materials science, and process engineering. This review highlights the most significant recent advances and addresses the cross-disciplinary challenges currently being faced.

Information

Type
Synthetic Biology Prospectives
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) A schematic representation detailing the steps in taking a material in nature, such as spider silk, and producing it in a heterologous host. Sequences coding for genes of interest (e.g., a spider silk protein), can be sequenced (DNA reading) and chemically synthesized (DNA writing). The synthesized DNA (red) is then typically incorporated into an expression vector (depicted by the circles) which is transformed into a host organism (e.g., Escherichia coli), for protein expression. In the example shown, spider silk proteins are then spun into fibers, and collected on a roller (material fabrication). (b) Assembly of DNA parts (A to E) allows the construction of protein chimeras, or the construction of metabolic pathways combining enzymes from multiple sources for monomer production.

Figure 1

Figure 2. The design–build–test–learn cycle for engineering biology. Iterating around the design–build–test cycle, testing large numbers of samples parallel, allows the synthetic biologist to efficiently find an optimum solution to their biology engineering problem.

Figure 2

Figure 3. (a) The domain structure of spider silk proteins, consisting of non-repetitive N- and C-terminal domains, flanking a much larger repetitive section which alternates between glycine-rich regions and polyalanines. (b) A model for the conversion of soluble spidroins, stored as protein micelles, into insoluble silk fibers through the assembly triggers of sheer stress, changing pH, dehydration, and changing salts in the silk gland of a spider. Adapted from Ref. [45].

Figure 3

Figure 4. Mechanism through which mussels adhere to surfaces in seawater. (a) Camera image showing mussel shell, foot, and byssus. (b) Macroscopic changes occurring during adhesive plaque deposition, (c) chemical changes that occur during plaque deposition before, and (d) after equilibration of pH with that of seawater. Reproduced with permission from Rodriguez et al..[88]

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) Hybrid Mfp-CsgA chimera proteins produced by Yu and co-workers and (b) their self-assembly into adhesive nanofibers. Reprinted with permission from Zhong et al..[104]

Figure 5

Figure 6. Adaptive camouflage of the octopus vulgaris: switching from camouflaged to conspicuous in 2 s. Reprinted with permission from Hanlon.[112]

Figure 6

Figure 7. Schematic illustration of the proposed bio-mechanical mechanism of iridophore iridescence activation in cephalopods. Acetylcholine (ACh) triggers a signal cascade which leads to the release of protein kinases (tyrosine kinase). The site-specific phosphorylation of tyrosine residues on reflectins triggers reversible hierarchical assembly into a condensed aggregate, accompanied by the efflux of water. This reduces the inter-lamellae thickness of the multilayer Bragg reflectors, changing the wavelengths of light subject to constructive/destructive interference and hence the observed color.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Schematic illustration of the general structure of reflectin proteins. Blue region = N-terminal reflectin motif (RMn), green regions = reflectin motif (RM). Flanking linker regions, N and C terminus, colored blue and red, respectively. Conserved region: (M/FD(X)5)(MD(X)5)n(MD(X)3/4).

Figure 8

Table I. Summary of the techniques employed to prepare optically active reflectin-based materials