Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T17:35:54.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A high-protein diet is anti-steatotic and has no pro-inflammatory side effects in dyslipidaemic APOE2 knock-in mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2014

Sonia C. Garcia Caraballo
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands NUTRIM School of Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
Tine M. Comhair
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands NUTRIM School of Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University, The Netherlands Nutrigenomics Consortium, Top Institute of Food and Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Cornelis H. C. Dejong
Affiliation:
NUTRIM School of Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University, The Netherlands Department of General Surgery, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Wouter H. Lamers
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands NUTRIM School of Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University, The Netherlands Nutrigenomics Consortium, Top Institute of Food and Nutrition, Wageningen, The Netherlands Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal Research, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
S. Eleonore Köhler*
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Maastricht University, The Netherlands NUTRIM School of Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
*
* Corresponding author: Dr S. E. Köhler, fax +31 43 3884134, email leo.koehler@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

High-protein (HP) diets are effective anti-steatotic treatment options for patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, but whether these diets also decrease steatosis in hyperlipidaemic conditions is not known. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of a HP diet on hepatic steatosis and inflammation in hyperlipidaemic mice. Hyperlipidaemic male and female APOE2 knock-in (APOE2ki) mice were fed a semi-synthetic low-protein (LP) or HP diet in combination with a low-fat diet or a high-fat diet for 3 weeks. The HP diets reduced hepatic fat and cholesterol concentrations to 40–55 % of those induced by the corresponding LP diets and attenuated hepatic inflammation mildly. The VLDL-associated plasma cholesterol concentrations decreased to 60–80 %, but those of TAG increased 3–4-fold. APOE2-mediated restriction of fat import into the liver did not modify the effects of a HP diet previously observed in wild-type mice. Female APOE2ki mice exhibited a higher expression of lipogenic, cholesterol-synthesising, inflammatory and cell-stress genes than wild-type female or male APOE2ki mice, but a similar response to HP diets. Low Apob expression and unchanged plasma APOB100 concentrations suggest that HP diets increase the plasma concentrations of TAG by slowing their clearance. The decrease in plasma leptin and hepatic fat and glycogen concentrations and the increase in fatty acid-oxidising gene and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 protein expression suggest a HP diet-mediated increase in mitochondrial metabolism. In conclusion, a HP diet reduces hepatic lipid content in dyslipidaemic mice and lowers the activation status of inflammatory cells in the liver.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 
Figure 0

Table 1 Biometric data of APOE2 knock-in mice fed diets differing in protein and fat contents for 3 weeks* (Mean values with their standard errors;n 10–12 mice per group)

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Hepatic lipid concentrations in APOE2 knock-in mice fed diets differing in protein and fat contents for 3 weeks. (a) Hepatic TAG; (b) NEFA; (c) total cholesterol (TC); and (d) phospholipids (PL). Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. The results of the three-way ANOVA (high protein (HP), high fat (HF) and sex) and their interactions of the three-way ANOVA (high protein (HP), high fat (HF) and sex) and interactions (HP × HF, HP × sex, HF × sex and HF × HP × sex) are given in online supplementary Table S6(B). □, Low fat (LF)/low protein (LP); , LF/HP; , HF/LP; ■, HF/HP.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Plasma lipid concentrations in APOE2 knock-in mice fed diets differing in protein and fat contents for 3 weeks. (a) TAG; (b) NEFA; (c) total cholesterol (TC); (d) phospholipids (PL); and (e) β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB). Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. The calculated effects of the three-way ANOVA (high protein (HP), high fat (HF) and sex) and interactions (HP × HF, HP × sex, HF × sex and HF × HP × sex) are given in online supplementary Table S6(C). □, Low fat (LF)/low protein (LP); , LF/HP; , HF/LP; ■, HF/HP.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Results of the fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) analysis of plasma of APOE2 knock-in (APOE2ki) mice fed diets differing in protein and fat contents for 3 weeks. Total cholesterol (TC) content of the FPLC fractions of pooled plasma of (a) male and (b) female mice fed a high-fat (HF) diet in combination with a low-protein (LP; ) or a high-protein (HP; ) diet or a low-fat (LF) diet in combination with a LP () or a HP () diet. (c) TAG content in the indicated pools of FPLC fractions of plasma of male APOE2ki mice. Note that the lowest TC and highest TAG concentrations were found in the plasma of mice fed the HP diets and that the plasma concentrations of HDL were higher in male mice than in female mice. □, LF/LP; , LF/HP; , HF/LP; ■, HF/HP. (d) SDS–PAGE gel with pooled FPLC fractions of male APOE2ki mice. The numbers 1–4 above the lanes indicate the respective dietary groups, with 1 = LF/LP; 2 = LF/HP; 3 = HF/LP; and 4 = HF/HP. (e) Results of a densitometric analysis of the SDS–PAGE gel. The quantities of APOB100, APOB48 and APOE proteins in fractions 7–21 (determined by integrating the optical density values of the APOB100, APOB48 and APOE protein bands) were corrected for total protein content in these lanes and were plotted against the protein content of the respective diets. The R2 values for the association of APOB100, APOB48 and APOE concentrations with the carbohydrate (CHO) content of the diet were 0·99, 0·86 and 0·98, respectively. □, APOB100; △, APOB48; ○, APOE. ND, not determined; AU, arbitrary unit.

Figure 4

Table 2 Hepatic expression of marker genes for lipogenesis, fatty acid oxidation and cholesterol synthesis in APOE2 knock-in mice fed diets differing in protein and fat contents for 3 weeks* (Mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 5

Table 3 Plasma glucose and hormone concentrations in APOE2 knock-in mice fed diets differing in protein and fat contents for 3 weeks* (Mean values with their standard errors; n 10–12)

Figure 6

Fig. 4 Hepatic glycogen content and expression of gluconeogenic markers in APOE2 knock-in mice fed diets differing in protein and fat contents for 3 weeks. (a) Hepatic glycogen content, (b) mRNA expression of the gluconeogenic markers glucose-6-phosphatase (G6pc) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (Pck1), and (c) Western blot of the gluconeogenic markers Pck1. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. Values are expressed relative to the male low-fat (LF)/low-protein (LP) mouse group ( = 1; original data are given in online supplementary Table S5). The calculated effects of the three-way ANOVA (high protein (HP), high fat (HF) and sex) and interactions (HP × HF, HP × sex, HF × sex and HF × HP × sex) are given in online supplementary Table S6(F). □, LF/LP; , LF/HP; , HF/LP; ■, HF/HP.

Figure 7

Fig. 5 Distribution of inflammatory cells in the livers of APOE2 knock-in mice fed diets differing in protein and fat contents for 3 weeks. Infiltration of inflammatory cells was heterogeneous. Examples of clusters of inflammatory cells are shown in this figure, while their quantification is shown in Fig. 6(a). Serial paraffin-embedded sections were stained (except for cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68) and integrin αM (ITGAM), which required frozen sections) to compare with the (a) haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining patterns. (b) Distribution of CD68-positive cells, with overview in the top row and magnification showing ‘foamy’ macrophages in the bottom row. (c) Distribution of ITGAM-positive (‘activated’) macrophages. Neutrophils were identified by the determination of (d) myeloperoxidase (MPO) and (e) lymphocyte antigen 6G (LY6G) expression, respectively. Circles indicate inflammatory foci, which are also visible in the H&E-stained section. (f) Magnification of a cluster ( = green circle in the high fat (HF)/high protein (HP) subpanel of (a), (d) and (e)) stained with H&E, MPO or LY6G, respectively. Note that for (c), (d) and (e), example pictures were selected in such a way to show all the different scoring levels. However, as shown in Fig. 6(a) for ITGAM, online supplementary Fig. S2(A) for ITGAM and online supplementary Fig. S3 for MPO and LY6G, there were no significant differences between the dietary groups with respect to these histopathological scores. LF, Low fat; LP, low protein. (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn)

Figure 8

Table 4 Correlation between integrin αM (ITGAM) and myeloperoxidase (MPO)/lymphocyte antigen 6G (LY6G) scores in the livers of APOE2 knock-in mice fed diets differing in protein and fat contents for 3 weeks*

Figure 9

Fig. 6 Markers of hepatic inflammation in APOE2 knock-in mice fed diets differing in protein and fat contents for 3 weeks. (a) Frequency distribution of integrin αM (ITGAM)-positive cells and cell clusters (scores 0–3). Horizontal lines indicate the medians. ○, Female; ●, male. (b) Quantification of total NF-κB (p65) and phosphorylated p65 (P-p65). (c, d) Hepatic expression of inflammatory markers. (e) Hepatic expression of cell-stress markers. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. Values are expressed relative to the male low-fat (LF)/low-protein (LP) mouse group ( = 1; original data are given in online supplementary Table S5). The calculated effects of the three-way ANOVA (high protein (HP), high fat (HF) and sex) and interactions (HP × HF, HP × sex, HF × sex and HF × HP × sex) are given in online supplementary Table S6(G). Cd68, cluster of differentiation 68; Mcp1, monocyte chemotactic protein-1; Tlr4, Toll-like receptor 4; Fgf21, fibroblast growth factor 21; Asns, asparagine synthetase (glutamine-hydrolysing); Chop, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein; Ppp1r15a, protein phosphatase 1 regulatory subunit 15A. □, LF/LP; , LF/HP; , HF/LP; ■, HF/HP.

Supplementary material: File

Garcia Caraballo Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Garcia Caraballo Supplementary Material(File)
File 18 MB