Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-x2lbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T11:34:36.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of exercise on postprandial endothelial function in adolescent boys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2012

Matthew J. Sedgwick
Affiliation:
Institute of Youth Sport, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LeicestershireLE11 3TU, UK
John G. Morris
Affiliation:
Institute of Youth Sport, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LeicestershireLE11 3TU, UK
Mary E. Nevill
Affiliation:
Institute of Youth Sport, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LeicestershireLE11 3TU, UK
Keith Tolfrey
Affiliation:
Institute of Youth Sport, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LeicestershireLE11 3TU, UK
Alan Nevill
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Healthcare Science, University of Wolverhampton, WolverhamptonWV1 1LY, UK
Laura A. Barrett*
Affiliation:
Institute of Youth Sport, School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LeicestershireLE11 3TU, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Dr L. A. Barrett, fax +44 1509 226301, email l.a.barrett@lboro.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ingestion of high-fat meals induces a state of endothelial dysfunction in adults. This dysfunction is attenuated by prior exercise. The response of young people to these nutritional and physiological stressors has not been established. Thus, the purpose of the present study was to investigate if a bout of moderate-intensity exercise influenced endothelial function (as indicated by flow-mediated dilation (FMD)) following the ingestion of a high-fat breakfast and lunch in adolescent boys (aged 12·6–14·3 years). Two, 2 d main trials (control and exercise) were completed by thirteen adolescent boys in a counter-balanced, cross-over design. Participants were inactive on day 1 of the control trial, but completed 60 min of walking at 60 % peak oxygen uptake in the exercise trial. On day 2, endothelial function was assessed via FMD prior to, and following, ingestion of a high-fat breakfast and lunch. There was no difference in fasting FMD between the control and exercise trial (P= 0·449). In the control trial, FMD was reduced by 32 % following consumption of the high-fat breakfast and by 24 % following lunch. In the exercise trial, the corresponding reductions were 6 and 10 %, respectively (main effect trial, P= 0·002). These results demonstrate that moderate-intensity exercise can attenuate the decline in FMD seen following the consumption of high-fat meals in adolescent boys.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012 
Figure 0

Table 1 Physical characteristics of participants (Mean values and standard deviations, n 13)

Figure 1

Table 2 Basal diameter and peak diameter* of the brachial artery during the measurement of flow-mediated dilation in the control and exercise trials (Mean values with their standard errors, n 13)

Figure 2

Fig. 1 (a) Flow-mediated dilation and (b) normalised flow-mediated dilation. B, breakfast; L, lunch. Values are means, with their standard errors represented by vertical bars (n 13). Data were analysed using a mixed-effects general linear model with two fixed factors (trial and time) and one random factor (participant). Least significant differences post hoc analysis was used to identify where significant main effects lay and when a significant time × trial interaction was identified, pre-specified planned comparisons were used, specifically comparisons within trial with respect to the fasting measure and between trials at the same time point. (a) Flow-mediated dilation: main effect trial (P= 0·002); main effect time (P= 0·023); and interaction effect trial × time (P= 0·088). (b) Normalised flow-mediated dilation: main effect trial (P= 0·004); main effect time (P= 0·004); and interaction effect trial × time (P= 0·040). * Difference from 0 h (P< 0·05). † Difference from previous time point (P< 0·05). ‡ Difference from 0 h in the same trial and difference from exercise trial at the same time point (P< 0·05). , Control; , exercise.

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Plasma (a) TAG, (b) glucose and (c) insulin concentrations. B, breakfast; L, lunch. Values are means with their standard errors represented by vertical bars (n 13). Data were analysed using a mixed-effects general linear model with two fixed factors (trial and time) and one random factor (participant). Least significant differences post hoc analysis was used to identify where significant main effects lay; TAG and insulin data were Ln transformed prior to the analysis. (a) TAG: main effect trial (P= 0·009); main effect time (P< 0·001); and interaction effect trial × time (P= 0·276). (b) Glucose: main effect trial (P= 0·877); main effect time (P< 0·001); and interaction effect trial × time (P= 0·361). (c) Insulin: main effect trial (P= 0·078); main effect time (P< 0·001); and interaction effect trial × time (P= 0·558). * Difference from 0 h (P< 0·05) and † Difference from previous time point (P< 0·05). , Control; , exercise.