Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pztms Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T02:35:25.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of infant feeding practices in the explanation for ethnic differences in infant growth: the Amsterdam Born Children and their Development study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2011

Marieke L. A. de Hoog*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department of Epidemiology, Documentation and Health Promotion, Public Health Service, PO Box 2200, 1000 CE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Manon van Eijsden
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, Documentation and Health Promotion, Public Health Service, PO Box 2200, 1000 CE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Karien Stronks
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Reinoud J. B. J. Gemke
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, EMGO Institute, Institute of Cardiovascular Research VU, VU University Medical Centre, PO Box 7057, 1007 MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tanja G. M. Vrijkotte
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author: M. L. A. de Hoog, fax +31 20 697 2316, email m.l.dehoog@amc.uva.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rapid early growth in infants may influence overweight and CVD in later life. Both rapid growth and these disease outcomes disproportionately affect some ethnic minorities. We determined ethnic differences in growth rate (Δ standard deviation scores, ΔSDS) during the first 6 months of life and assessed the explanatory role of infant feeding. Data were derived from a multiethnic cohort for the Amsterdam Born Children and their Development study (The Netherlands). Growth data (weight and length) of 2998 term-born singleton infants with no fetal growth restriction were available for five ethnic populations: Dutch (n 1619), African descent (n 174), Turkish (n 167), Moroccan (n 232) and other non-Dutch (n 806). ΔSDS for weight, length and weight-for-length between 4 weeks and 6 months were defined using internal references. Infant feeding pattern (breast-feeding duration, introduction of formula feeding and complementary feeding) in relation to ethnic differences in growth rate was examined by multivariate linear regression. Results showed that the growth rate was higher in almost all ethnic minorities, with β between 0·07 and 0·41 for ΔSDS weight and between 0·12 and 0·42 for ΔSDS length, compared with ethnic Dutch infants. ΔSDS weight-for-length was similar across groups, except for Moroccan infants (β 0·25, P < 0·05) after correction for confounders. In general, exclusive breast-feeding for 4 months was associated with slower growth for all three growth measures. Feeding factors explained, to a small degree, the higher weight and length gain in African descent infants, but not the higher ΔSDS weight-for-length in the Moroccan population. More research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the high infant growth rate in Turkish and Moroccan infants.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011
Figure 0

Table 1 Characteristics of the study sample according to ethnic group(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 1

Table 2 Association between infant feeding and growth rate in Δ standard deviation scores (ΔSDS) for weight, length and weight-for-length during the first 6 months of life(Number of infants, β coefficients and 95 % confidence intervals)

Figure 2

Fig. 1 Effect of infant feeding pattern in the 4th month on Δ standard deviation scores (ΔSDS) for weight. ΔSDS weight adjusted for parental height, smoking during pregnancy, hypertension, diabetes, parity, living with partner, gestational age, standardised birth weight and ethnicity × feeding pattern. , Exclusive breast-feeding; , breast-feeding with formula and/or complementary feeding; , formula feeding with or without complementary feeding.

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Effect of infant feeding pattern in the 4th month on Δ standard deviation scores (ΔSDS) for length. ΔSDS length adjusted for parental height, smoking during pregnancy, hypertension, diabetes, parity, living with partner, gestational age, standardised birth weight and ethnicity × feeding pattern. , Exclusive breast-feeding; , breast-feeding with formula and/or complementary feeding; , formula feeding with or without complementary feeding.

Figure 4

Fig. 3 Effect of infant feeding pattern in the 4th month on Δ standard deviation scores (ΔSDS) for weight-for-length. ΔSDS weight-for-length adjusted for parental height, smoking during pregnancy, hypertension, diabetes, parity, living with partner, gestational age, standardised birth weight and ethnicity × feeding pattern. , Exclusive breast-feeding; , breast-feeding with formula and/or complementary feeding; , formula feeding with or without complementary feeding.

Figure 5

Table 3 Multivariate analyses for Δ standard deviation scores (ΔSDS) for weight, length and weight-for-length as a function of ethnicity(β Coefficients and 95 % confidence intervals)